« Some Thoughts On Bailout Bill And Disgusting Partisanship
Tin Foil Hat in Crazytown: Why the Bailout Failed »



The Bailout Bill & Playing The Blame Game

September 29th, 2008
By SHAUN MULLEN, TMV Columnist

Print Print

01aaaForeclosure.jpg

It comes as no surprise that there was a steady drumbeat of partisan politics in the drafting of the $700 billion financial bailout plan that was defeated this afternoon largely because of defiant House Republicans. But both parties turned up the vitriol in the wake of the stunning no-confidence vote in President Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, and global markets dutifully reacted. As one leading economic light wrote, “Yes, Virginia, this is a crash.”

As the following summary of the plan that lost by a 228-205 vote shows, the Democratic leadership more or less prevailed before vote, while Bush and Paulson didn’t do so hot. Oh, and John McCain had zip to do with the outcome, although he was quick to pin the blame on Barack Obama. Pray tell? Will McCain “suspend” his campaign again?

The summary:


* A new congressional panel would have oversight power and the Treasury secretary would report regularly to lawmakers as part of a multi-level oversight apparatus.

* If the Treasury takes a stake in a company, the top five executives would be subject to compensation limits.

* Executives hired after a financial company offloads more than $300 million in assets via auction to the government will not be eligible for “golden parachutes.”

* The Federal Reserve would begin paying interest on bank reserves on October 1, giving it another tool for easing credit strains.

* A study would be undertaken to determine the impact of the mark-to-market accounting standards that critics blame for a downward spiral in the valuation of assets on corporate balance sheets.

* The federal government may stall foreclosure proceedings on home loans purchased under the plan.

* Along with the plan to buy securities outright, the Treasury will develop an alternative insurance program that would underwrite troubled loans and be paid for by participating companies.

* If the government has taken losses five years into the program, the Treasury will draft a plan to tax the companies that took part to recoup taxpayer losses.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi came in for extra helpings of Republican scorn after the vote for speaking the truth about the staggering $700 billion price tag beforehand:

“It is a number that is staggering, but tells us only the costs of the Bush Administration’s failed economic policies — policies built on budgetary recklessness, on an anything goes mentality, with no regulation, no supervision, and no discipline in the system.”

An analysis by Swing State Project showed that among 38 incumbent congressmen in races rated as “toss up” or “lean,” just eight voted for the bailout as opposed to 30 against. The vote among congressfolks who didn’t have as much to worry about was nearly even: 197 for and 198 against.

Meanwhile, there has been a lot of blame gaming over the roots of the financial meltdown, but none as insidious than the canard that minorities are responsible for the whole mess because they bought houses on which they couldn’t keep up the payments.

The bogeymen are those damned libruls and their Community Reinvestment Act, which required banks to lend to low-income borrowers. Among the problems with blaming the CRA is that subprime loans weren’t required and many more subprime loans were written during the irrational exuberance of the housing bubble.

The truth is much less convenient: While people of all colors who had no business buying houses are a factor, mortgage companies and banks saw subprime loans as “free money.”

When the economy started tanking, the bubble burst and borrowers started defaulting at a record pace, many of these lenders didn’t have the legs to ride out the storm despite an “anything goes” deregulatory environment that had been gift wrapped for them by congressional Democrats and Republicans alike.

Oh, and even though it played well at the time in the hustings, letting Lehman Brothers fail doesn’t look like it was such a hot idea anymore.

No matter the eventual fate of the bailout bill, and no one has a clue as to whether it will work when it eventually clears Congress — and it will eventually clear Congress — the Democrats will be blamed for any perceived shortcomings although they had the sense to realize that no bill would pass without bipartisan support and have taken a goodly number of their partisan must-haves off the table while leaving some of the Republicans’ on.



This entry was posted on Monday, September 29th, 2008 at 4:18 pm and is filed under House of Representatives, George W. Bush, Wall Street, Bush Administration, John McCain, Economy. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 6 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    I'm waiting for the trolls...

    3...2...1...
    • ^
    • v
    sorry. I must be early. Shaun, I agree with most of your post. Maybe all of it. I dislike the "blame game" meme, which I have seen both sides use to stifle dissent. It's not a "blame game" to assess accountability and responsibility. It is essential to our ability to learn from past mistakes. The opposite of this "blame game" is to say "mistakes were made" and let's just move on (ignoring any lessons to be learned or corrective action to be taken to prevent future recurrences). Indeed, a big part of the problem is that the GOP dismantled some of the protections enacted after the Great Depression.
    • ^
    • v
    Glass-Steagall was repealed with Democratic encouragement and Robert Rubin's as well as President Bill Clinton's approval in the 1990s. Just in case some have chosen conveniently to forget things that matter.

    It's great that the bill failed. Now both sides can start to really get to work, hopefully free of gimmicks and earmarks or anything else that doesn't matter. Not that that is the best we can hope for. Best of all would be no government interference whatsoever with the now-overdue failures that should be permitted to occur.
    • ^
    • v
    GreenDreams : "It's not a "blame game" to assess accountability and responsibility. It is essential to our ability to learn from past mistakes."

    God I love it when common sense makes an appearance. Amen brother!
    • ^
    • v
    If is laughable that Shaun expects two lame duck politicians President Bush and Sec. Paulson but no leadership from Pelosi, Reid, or especially Senator Obama.

    The Democrats have been in charge of Congress for almost two years. How many hearings were held on the coming credit crunch. How many times have Democrats introduced legislation to change things in the last two years.

    If Shaun was not such a partisan he would rightly be ripping into Speaker Pelosi. She has been as incompetent and lacking as Speaker Hastert was. Here it is at the end of September and the Congress rush through continuing resolutions to make up for hard work on the budget. Speaker Pelosi sent a bill to the floor while not knowing if she had the votes and when supposedly wanting it to be Bipartisan, gave the Republicans the back of her hand instead of asking for help.

    If Speaker Pelosi is the shape of things to come with the Democrats in charge of everything, I wonder how Shaun will find ways to blame Republicans for the total lack of leadership on the part of Democrats.

    Also,I noticed Shaun went out of his way to not stated that 95 Democrats Congressmen had the sense to not vote for a junked up piece of legislation. If Congress wants to do something have hearings, debates, and fact gathering before proposing 750 billion in additional debt.
    • ^
    • v
    IGreenDreams : "Indeed, a big part of the problem is that the GOP dismantled some of the protections enacted after the Great Depression."

    Exactly. So much for learning from history eh? Good grief...
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Some Thoughts On Bailout Bill And Disgusting Partisanship
Tin Foil Hat in Crazytown: Why the Bailout Failed »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.