« Lo Siento Mucho
Raped by Halliburton »



Would GOP Huckabee Nomination Be Democrats’ Dream Come True?

December 11th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

There is an apparent impressive “surge” going on — on the political front: the continued surge of Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, which is now reflected in two polls.

So the Democrats are now faced with a new twist in this campaign as (once again) the talking heads and for-certain experts have to reformulate their all-knowing pronouncements on what was going to happen. Huckabee is a new face. A fresh face. So shouldn’t the Demmies now be afraid?

The answer is apparently — for right now — NO:

While presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee is surging in new polls of GOP candidates, a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released Tuesday shows he would lose to all three leading Democratic candidates by double digits in hypothetical contests.

In head-to-head matchups — the first to include Huckabee — the former Arkansas governor loses to Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York by 10 percentage points (54 percent to 44 percent), to Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois by 15 points (55 percent to 40 percent) and to former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina by 25 points (60 percent to 35 percent).

The poll comes on the heels of a CNN/Opinion Research poll released Monday that showed Huckabee doubled his support nationally among likely Republican voters in the last month and is in a statistical dead heat with former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani. View complete poll results

But Huckabee’s double-digit deficits with the leading Democrats likely suggest that the Arkansas Republican still lacks widespread name recognition nationally, according to Keating Holland, CNN’s polling director.

“Americans tend not to support candidates they’re not familiar with, and it’s possible Huckabee’s numbers are low in these hypothetical matchups because he is still not very well known nationally,” Holland said.

So the question becomes: as Americans get to know more about Huckabee, will the possibility that he might get the nomination be good or bad news for the Democrats?

It’d be good news if his low numbers stayed low or Americans didn’t like what the learned as they “sampled” him. It’d be bad news for the Democrats if the real story of 2008 becomes how Huckabee emerged Reagan-like, as someone who the experts “knew” didn’t have a chance but whose personality came across the boob tube in a way that he connected with Americans who might not even totally agree with him.

But note that part of Huckabee’s persona will be defined by the Democrats who will seek to “define him.”

According to Matt Drudge (who we do not usually quote on this site due to some accuracy issues in some of his past posts — but this fits in with the poll numbers), the Democrats are in no rush. Drudge quotes Democratic sources as saying a party directive essentially orders Democrats to leave Huckabee alone.

The reason: he is perceived as the “Republican’s George McGovern” — someone whose past statements can be used against him to define him as too extreme to be President.

NOTE: In the past we’ve said here that Drudge’s sources are almost all Republicans so he couldn’t be trusted on his exclusive reports that quoted unnamed Democrats. But that has changed recently with several stories noting that Drudge is now believed to have a working news relationship with some operatives in Senator Hillary Clinton’s camp. That could be the sourcing on this item.

The Drudge item ends with a quote from an unnamed Republican saying Clinton should be afraid — that Huckabee could be her worst nightmare.

And, indeed, if by the summer it’s clear that Americans in 2008 truly CRAVE a fresh face in the White House — no one connected to the past bitter political battles, or who has been on the scene forever and is trying to cultivate an existing image or erase another — who would most benefit among the leading candidates? Democratic Senator Barack Obama and Republican Mike Huckabee.

If voters want a change and the choice is Clinton and Huckabee, the war will be on by each camp to define the other and may the best mudslinger win. But the thirst for a change could be so big that the Democrats could find themselves with a bigger battle on their hands than they thought.

The supreme irony: both Clinton and Huckabee are candidates who are popular with their respective parties’ base but may have a tougher and more difficult sell in the general election.



This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 11th, 2007 at 11:31 am and is filed under Hillary Clinton, Mike Huckabee, Republicans, Democrats, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Lo Siento Mucho
Raped by Halliburton »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.