« ‘Hog tight, horse high and bull strong’
Is Huckabee Clinton or Carter? »



Did A Hi-Tech Laser Beam Kill Benazir Bhutto?

January 2nd, 2008
By SWARAAJ CHAUHAN, International Columnist

Print Print

laser beam

Here are two important stories related to Pakistan. First, allegations have surfaced that sophisticated laser beam technology was used to eliminate Benazir Bhutto. Second, Pakistan’s general election has been postponed until February 18.

Key members of the US Congress were last night preparing to block further aid to Pakistan as the mystery surrounding Benazir Bhutto’s assassination deepened, with claims she was “targeted with the latest laser beam technology”, similar to that used by American forces in Iraq, reports The Australian.

“The moves by the US politicians came as French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner arrived in Islamabad for talks with President Pervez Musharraf over demands for an inquiry into the Bhutto killing similar to that mounted by the UN into the death of Lebanese leader Rafik Hariri in 2004.

“With speculation and innuendo growing over just who killed Bhutto, 12 members of the US Congress were demanding that all aid to Pakistan be frozen until the mystery was cleared up.

“Controversy surrounding the assassination intensified yesterday amid reports that crucial records had been removed from the Rawalpindi General Hospital where Bhutto was taken, and claims she was killed using laser-beam technology.

“The Nation on its front page said the gunfire and bomb blasts at Bhutto’s election rally “were a decoy to hide the real shooters” and claimed laser technology similar to that used by American forces in Iraq had been used. (Use of these weapons is also controversial as they have the potential to cause permanent harm. Lasers designed to cause permanent blindness were internationally banned under a UN agreement in 1995.)

More here…

Pakistan’s wellknown paper The Nation states: “Baitullah Mahsud and Taliban don’t have such (laser beam) technology. After bomb blasts in Karachi on Oct 18, Mahsud sent two messages to Benazir in which he said that they have neither any hostility against her, nor would make any attempt to kill her.

“When Benazir was admitted to Rawalpindi General Hospital, Dr M Musaddiq Khan told a PPP leader that he saw such a case for the first time in his life. These wounds were not of bullets, Dr said and added that she had expired before shifting to the hospital and a part of her brain and blood had spilled over from her head,” the sources unveiled. The sources said that both gunshots and bomb blast were a decoy to hide the real shooters.”

More here… Some food for thought: If the allegations about laser beam technology prove to be true…then the important question: How did this latest sophisticated US technology reach Pakistan?

Meanwhile despite Opposition parties’ demand that the General Elections be held as scheduled on January 8, Pakistan authorities have delayed the election by six weeks - to be held on Feb 18 now. An AP report says: “The opposition alleged that authorities were postponing the polls to help the ruling party, amid expectations that Bhutto’s group could get a sympathy boost at the polls.

“The ruling party could also suffer a backlash. Bhutto had accused elements within the group of plotting to kill her, a charge it vehemently denies.

“It was not immediately clear if Bhutto’s party would pursue threats to take to the streets because of the delayed vote. Earlier, party Sen. Babar Awan warned that the delay may trigger street protests and riots.”

The Reuters story provids analysts views: “Farzana Raja, spokeswoman for Bhutto’s Pakistan People’s Party: ‘Whatever reasons they give are such lame-duck excuses because the electoral papers and lists were burnt in the districts, but they have those lists in the central office.

” ‘We reject their baseless excuses. We’re ready to fight the election. It was all done on the request of Musharraf’s party because they can see defeat in the elections’.

“Nawaz Sharif’s spokesman Nadir Chaudhri: ‘We’ve already said that we want to contest straight away on the 8th, and so does the People’s Party, so it is a disappointment. We feel that the elections should have been held on the 8th. We’re going to decide our future course of action now at a meeting’.

“Tariq Azim Khan, Senior official of pro-Musharraf Pakistan Muslim League: ‘It’s realistic and understandable, a short delay, keeping in mind the ground realities. There may be some (sympathy vote), but it’s wrong to prejudge what the voters will do. Sympathies don’t die down in a few days. It can’t be much of a leader if the sympathy is forgotten in just a few days’.”

At the national level, Pakistan elects a bicameral legislature, the Parliament of Pakistan, which consists of a directly-elected National Assembly of Pakistan and a Senate whose members are chosen by elected provincial legislators. More here…

For my recent stories on Benazir’s death please click here… And here…



This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 am and is filed under Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« ‘Hog tight, horse high and bull strong’
Is Huckabee Clinton or Carter? »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.