Biden

August 19th, 2008
By ROBERT STEIN

Print Print

If Barack Obama was not already inclined toward him as a running mate, John McCain and Vladimir Putin in the past week should have helped make up his mind to choose Joe Biden.

His trip to Georgia as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee underscored his credentials to complement Obama’s idealism with the experience and know-how to navigate through a world of treacherous policy decisions.

“We must help Georgia rebuild what has been destroyed,” Obama said today in a speech at the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention. “That is why I’m proud to join my friend, Senator Joe Biden, in calling for an additional $1 billion in reconstruction assistance for the people of Georgia.”

In the bitter campaign ahead, Republicans would have a harder time persuading voters of their candidate’s superiority on national security against a ticket anchored by Biden’s five-year record of attempting to resolve the political knots in Iraq rather than pushing on with McCain’s mindless flag-waving about victory that is still costing American lives and billions of dollars.

The surest way now for Obama to answer attacks on his good judgment and doubts about his political maturity is to announce his choice of Joe Biden and get on with ending the Bush-McCain era in November.

Cross-posted from my blog.




This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 19th, 2008 at 1:56 pm and is filed under Foreign Policy, Democratic Party, Georgia (Country of FSU), Newsweek Blogitics, Diplomacy, Vice President, Joe Biden, Vladimir Putin, War, 2008 Elections, Iraq, Russia, John McCain, Barack Obama, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    The surest way now for Obama to answer attacks on his good judgment and doubts about his political maturity is to announce his choice of Joe Biden and get on with ending the Bush-McCain era in November.

    Picking Biden does the exact opposite. Obama and Biden picked opposite sides on Iraq. So if he picks Biden, Obama needs him to admit he made a grave mistake on the invasion. Otherwise Obama will be tacitly turning his back on what has so far been a much smarter vision for our foreign policy.
    • ^
    • v
    Biden turned him down.

    Like I said, democrats "in the know" know a sinking ship when they see one. Who wants to jump on board when it's a certain career-wrecker?

    Answer: nobody.

    Obama may have to grab an intern on the way into the Convention and wave them around as his VP choice. He's got to be getting a little nervous by now..
    • ^
    • v
    Biden turned nobody down. Everybody's going crazy over his "I'm not the guy" comment, which he later said meant nothing.

    Biden's Iraq vote is not too problematic because he's been such a critic of Bush for so long.

    He's a great attack dog. He has tons of foreign policy experience (and a son soon to be deployed to Iraq). And he has appeal to blue collar voters (despite his credit card vote).

    The downside is that he talks too much and he had that plagiarism issue 20 years ago.

    Overall, I think he's a great pick.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.