Gallup Daily: Obama Clinton Race Stalemated Tie (Obama Ahead By 1)

April 28th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

How close is the race between Senator Barack Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton among Democrats in the increasingly divided Democratic party? It remains a virtual tie…a stalemate…where one slip by one candidate could change the high-stakes dynamics of a race being closely watched by convention superdelegates.

Just look at the latest Gallup Daily tracking poll:

Gallup Poll Daily tracking conducted April 25-27 shows Democrats closely divided in their nomination preferences, with 47% favoring Barack Obama and 46% backing Hillary Clinton.
The race has been stable at a virtual dead heat in each of the last four Gallup Poll Daily tracking reports. This follows Clinton’s victory in the April 22 Pennsylvania Democratic primary — an event which has helped Clinton challenge what had been a growing sense of inevitability around Obama winning the nomination. (To view the complete trend since Jan. 3, 2008, click here.)

Also, the two have been roughly tied in each individual day of polling included in today’s three-day rolling average. Barring any political firestorms along the lines of the recent Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Kosovo controversies, the race could very well remain closely contested through at least the May 6 Indiana and North Carolina primaries.

There is also no change in national registered voter preferences for the fall, with Clinton beating John McCain by three percentage points, 47% to 44%, and Obama running even with McCain, each at 45%.

But there are other polls that provide other glimpses into the evolving preferences of the Democratic and general electorate:

1. A new Rasmussen Reports poll indicates the number of Democrats that want Clinton out of the race is increasing:

Thirty-four percent (34%) of Democrats nationwide now believe that Hillary Clinton should drop out of the race for the White House. That’s up from 32% earlier in April and 22% in late March.

As for Barack Obama, just 22% of Democrats say he should drop out. That’s down from 26% earlier in April and unchanged from 22% in March. Just 1% want both candidates to drop out and 45% aren’t ready for either to leave.

Nationally, Obama holds a modest but steady lead over Clinton in the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll.

By a 62% to 25% mark, Obama supporters say that Clinton should leave the race. But, just 4% of those who support Senator Clinton agree. Clinton supporters are evenly divided as to whether Obama should drop out.

Overall, 58% of all voters now believe Obama will be the nominee. That’s down slightly from 62% earlier in the month. Among Democrats 59% expect Obama to win (down from 63%). Rasmussen Markets currently suggests that Obama has an 79.6% chance of winning the nomination.

2. A new Associated Press-Ipsos poll shows Clinton would have an easier time deafeating presumptive Republican nominee Senator John McCain:

Hillary Rodham Clinton now leads John McCain by 9 points in a head-to-head presidential matchup, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll that bolsters her argument that she is more electable than Democratic rival Barack Obama.

Obama and Republican McCain are running about even.

The survey released Monday gives the New York senator and former first lady a fresh talking point as she works to raise much-needed campaign cash and persuade pivotal undecided superdelegates to side with her in the drawn-out Democratic primary fight.

Helped by independents, young people and seniors, Clinton gained ground this month in a hypothetical match with Sen. McCain, the GOP nominee-in-waiting. She now leads McCain, 50 percent to 41 percent, while Obama remains virtually tied with McCain, 46 percent to 44 percent.

Both Democrats were roughly even with McCain in the previous poll about three weeks ago.

Since then, Clinton won the Pennsylvania primary, raising questions anew about whether Obama can attract broad swaths of voters needed to triumph in such big states come the fall when the Democratic nominee will go up against McCain. At the same time, Obama was thrown on the defensive by his comment that residents of small-town America were bitter. The Illinois senator also continued to deal with the controversial remarks of his longtime Chicago pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

And two pollsters (D&R) agree: these numbers bode well for Clinton:

“I don’t think there’s any question that over the last three weeks her stature has improved,” said Harrison Hickman, a Democratic pollster unaligned in the primary. He attributed Clinton’s gains to people moving from the “infatuation stage” of choosing the candidate they like the most to a “decision-making stage” where they determine who would make the best president.

Added Steve Lombardo, a GOP pollster: “This just reinforces the sentiment that a lot of Republican strategists are having right now — that Clinton might actually be the more formidable fall candidate for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is that Obama can’t seem to get his footing back.”

Note again that polls are see-saws that seemingly fluctuate with the conventional wisdom and with whatever candidate comes out better in a given news cycle. But the bottom line is: they show a serious erosion for Obama and a rebound for Clinton.




This entry was posted on Monday, April 28th, 2008 at 1:50 pm and is filed under Elections, John McCain, Approval Ratings, Independents, Primaries, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, 2008 Elections, Polls, Independent Voters, Republicans, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    The interpretations from the pollsters is hysterical. Clinton won the same voters she's been winning for a while and Obama's winning the same voters and somehow this comes out to momentum for Clinton this week, as well as an inability for Obama to win in the fall. When Obama wins NC just as it's been predicted for weeks, will it then be Obama's amazing comeback and momentum and proof that Clinton can't win in the fall? And then proof of Clinton's abilities in Kentucky.... and Obama's in Oregon and....

    In many ways the continuing even divide is bad news for Clinton. At this point, because Clinton lost 12 states in a row, she can't stay even. She needs to regularly poll at 60-65% over Obama if she wishes to win the pledged delegates. Since that's not happening and she's still running, she's either running either on prayer that we discover Obama's secret history as a spy for North Korea or that the superdelegates will overturn the pledged delegates. I guess not much new in my comment.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.