'Common Good' as Emerging Democrat Theme

‘Common Good’ as Emerging Democrat Theme

November 23rd, 2007
By PAUL SILVER

In “Democrats Rework the Rhetoric”, John D. MCKinnon writes in the Wall Street Journal about how a “Notion of the ‘Common Good’ Replaces Old-Style Bromides”

…many Democrats are embracing it as a new framework for expressing their vision of broader opportunity and equality. ie, leveling the economic playing field and backing strong unions and universal health care, shared duties and responsibilities, not only among classes but between the two parties…it as an effective way to talk about economic fairness — and reduce the Republicans’ big advantage in the linguistic arms race. eg “death tax” and “ownership society” that buttress Republicans’ probusiness, free-market views. This “has caught on, particularly among Catholic voters, and seems to be an appealing answer to Republican rhetoric.”

“The central question should not be, ‘Are you better off than you were four years ago?’ It should be, ‘How can we — all of us, especially the weak and vulnerable — be better off in the years ahead?’”

“…the common-good theme appealed to religious types, but wasn’t biblical-sounding, and so would be less likely to put off secular voters. Strategists also thought it sounded broad enough to appeal to moderates as well as liberals. A poll in 2006 by the liberal Center for American Progress showed 68% of Americans strongly agreeing that the “government should be committed to the common good and put the public’s interest above the privileges of the few.”

This is appealing to my sense of fairness and balance and I imagine resonates with the values of many in the GOP. The role I see for the GOP is to champion the most efficient and effective methods for achieving these aims; such as taxes and subsidies that are more wisely distributed among the citizens.

It seems to me that when a society lets its citizens suffer more than it is reasonable to justify there is an invitation for resentment to rise dangerously high; such as we see in Pakistan, or any right wing totalitarian state. Perhaps the path to harmony and stability is government that facilitate not only opportunity and freedom of expression, but a social safety net as well.

This entry was posted on Friday, November 23rd, 2007 at 3:15 pm and is filed under Democrats, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

blog comments powered by Disqus

« The News From Basra

Will 2008’s Choice Be Between “Fear And Loathing?” »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.