Random Pre-Debate Thoughts That Might Be On Topic…

October 7th, 2008
By T-STEEL, Site Administrator

Print Print

Since Governor Sarah Palin has blasted on the scene, I’ve been wondering how she would have done if she were running in the Republican primary. She would have stuck out like a sore big toe among that super-dull crowd of McCain, Thompson, Giuliani, Romney, and others (well Mike Huckabee was not that dull). Can you imagine the “Sarahcuda” on the debate stage hurling zingers at those good ol’ boys? And could she really have won the Republican Party nomination?

And speaking of debates, why have all these rules? Why not throw McCain, Obama, Palin, and Biden in the debate ring together unfiltered? Just let them sling diamonds and mud at each other and see who’s left standing. Why do we get all stodgy in these debates when we’re a country of constant entertainment and excitement?

Just some things to think about before the big bad debate between Senator John “Palin Said Knock You Out” McCain and Senator Barack “Cool As The Other Side Of The Pillow” Obama.




This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 7th, 2008 at 2:36 pm and is filed under Debates, Democratic Party, Humor, Republican Party, Newsweek Blogitics, North America, USA, Democrats, 2008 Elections, Republicans, Barack Obama, John McCain, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Viewing 6 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    "John 'Palin Said Knock You Out' McCain".

    Hah! Could you imagine McCain being introduced at a rally with LL Cool J blaring on the loudspeakers? Priceless...
    • ^
    • v
    I have absolutely no idea how Palin would have done in the primaries. She definitely would have stuck out. But could she have participated successfully in the huge numbers of primaries the Republicans held being attacked by all the other candidates if she had gotten a polling lead? No idea.
    • ^
    • v
    Palins' Un-American Activities

    Imagine if the Obamas had hooked up with a violently anti-American group in league with the government of IRAN!. By David Talbot

    Oct. 7, 2008 | "My government is my worst enemy. I'm going to fight them with any means at hand." This was former revolutionary terrorist Bill Ayers back in his old Weather Underground days, right? Imagine what Sarah Palin is going to do with this incendiary quote as she tears into Barack Obama this week. ONLY ONE PROBLEM. The quote is from Joe Vogler, the raging anti-American who founded the Alaska Independence Party. Inconveniently for Palin, that's the very same secessionist party that her husband, Todd, belonged to for seven years and that she sent a shout-out to as Alaska governor earlier this year. ("Keep up the good work," Palin told AIP members. "And God bless you.")

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/07...

    McCain Camp cannot talk about the economy because their Economics is for the Rich, the well-off and the well connected!
    • ^
    • v
    T-Steel, interesting question... how Aplin would have done in teh GOP primaries.

    I think she would have failed. We saw how the seasoned pros went at each otehr, including McCain and Romney. Palin would not have been able to withstand that mudslinging (with the scandals in her closet). She would have been raked over the coals for her support of the earmarks (and that bridge), her husband's connection to the AIP, her increase of government spending as governor of Alaska and finally her raising taxes on oil companies. The other candidates would have said that she raised taxes on oil companies to give money to the citizens, who do not pay state income tax anyway, and that raising taxes on oil companies only forces those oil companies to pass the costs to the rest of the US. They may also have skewered her on the pipeline to Canada and helping Canada create jobs (not the lower 48). Oh, and I guess they really would have laid into her over IRaq since the GOP is big on foreign policy and a year ago everyone was talking about the success (or not) of the surge... a topic she doesn't appear to have given much thought to until recently.

    It actually would have been very illuminating to see how her fellowo GOP opponents would have treated her in the primaries.

    I'll tell you one thing.. if she had gotten in the race before Fred Thompson, he never would have ran because she would have been the fresh face everyone was expecting from Fred. If Sarah and Fred had gotten in at the saem time he would have dropped out after a week...
    • ^
    • v
    LL would definitely not let that go without some "cheddar" comin' his way- which I doubt would considering McCain has not yet offered any to artists for stealing their music like a Napster...
    • ^
    • v
    The first debate would have been a flirt-fest. But by round two she'd be out like Elisabeth Hasselbeck on Survivor.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.