Could Hillary Clinton Be In Running Again As Obama Vice President?

June 30th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

Was Senator Hillary Clinton’s performance at the Unity rally with presumptive Democratic nominee Senator Barack Obama so strong that she could be seriously in the running for Obama’s Veep? New York Daily News columnist Michael Goodwin, who had been highly-critical of her, thinks so.

And those who hold this belief could point to news that her husband former President Bill Clinton plans to meet with Obama this week as a sign of major fence-mending that could mean both Clintons could soon be totally on board the bandwagon.

Goodwin writes:

My bet a month ago was that he shouldn’t and wouldn’t make the offer. Now I’m not sure. Clinton’s Friday performance adds to my growing belief the dream ticket is an on-again possibility.

Two things have happened that help her chances of extending the streak of having a Bush or a Clinton on one of the national tickets. It’s been the case every four years since Poppy Bush was Ronald Reagan’s running mate in 1980, and 2008 is trending in that direction.

One problem with that idea. There are some Americans who would like a ticket that does not include a Bush or a Clinton because (supposedly) we don’t have dynastic political governance in this country.

The first change is her behavior, where she has emerged from her vacation without the chip on her shoulder. The second thing that has happened is that Obama’s numerous flip-flops have created more doubts about who he is and what he stands for.

Clinton, who reportedly wants the veep spot, certainly didn’t hold back at their first joint appearance. She was so good she almost had me forgetting how she was arguing to superdelegates not long ago that Obama was unelectable.

She may still believe that, but how she acts is what matters. While part of the reason she’s leaning forward is that she doesn’t want to be blamed if Obama loses, she also realizes that enthusiasm for him serves her interests, too. Her future depends on repairing her relations with black Democrats, and there is no faster way to do that than by giving her best for Obama.

When she does that, as she did Friday, it’s obvious he has to consider putting her on the ticket. She gave a better speech than he did and won the gravitas weigh-in. She would help him reach more women and lower-income whites if she were on the ticket than a mere surrogate.

Goodwin then suggests Obama must have a reason to say no to her. He’s going to have to weight a variety of factors, pluses, minuses and the results of vetting, to reach his and his V.P. selection team’s choice. He can then pick someone else and praise their virtues. Obama is under no obligation to choose Clinton (although some of her supporters don’t see it that way) but Goodwin is correct that she has grown enormously as a candidate in the primaries. In fact, Hillary Clinton has grown more in terms of content, speaking skills and political nimbleness than any other candidate who ran in the primaries of either party.

Chances still are that she won’t be the pick. And, whether she is or isn’t, a question is: what about her reportedly-pouting husband, Bill Clinton? CNN reports that the former President will meet with Obama this week and that he insists he isn’t pouting:

Sen. Barack Obama and former President Bill Clinton are expected to meet in the next few days, according to the chairman of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s unsuccessful presidential bid.

Terry McAuliffe said the former president was angered by media reports suggesting he bore a grudge against Obama after the sometimes bruising primary campaign and did not plan to actively support Obama in the general election.

“He was angry that these ridiculous stories were out here, and these supposed close friends of the president — none of the close friends ever got called,” McAuliffe said, referring to anonymous sources quoted in some stories. “What happens, a lot of time, is people like to pretend they’re close so they can tell the reporters that they’re close, but, you know, they’re just talking.”

McAuliffe said he spoke to Bill Clinton on Sunday morning. The former president recently returned from a trip to Europe.

McAuliffe, however, is Mr. Spin for the Clinton campaign. He insists Bill Clinton hasn’t come out sooner because he didn’t want to take the spotlight off the Unity event. INSERT YOUR LAUGH HERE. There just are too many stories in the media about the former President’s ire and wounded feelings.

Stories that plentiful aren’t created by reporters tricking their editors and sitting at Starbucks sipping Lattes. They come from sources.

The bottom line: it is not in either of the Clintons’ interests now to be dragging their feet and be seen as overtly and covertly hostile to Obama.

But Goodwin is correct: Hillary Clinton is now very much a political figure in her own right and one of the best campaigners of either party. She could bring some things to the ticket — and also create a few polling and other problems as well.

The betting here: Obama won’t select her but she will play a high-profile role in the campaign and will be a major national figure if Obama wins.

FOOTNOTE: Forget all the malarkey about Hillary being too old to run in 2016. It’s one more smug conventional wisdom statement that will fall to the wayside.




This entry was posted on Monday, June 30th, 2008 at 6:51 am and is filed under Democratic Party, Newsweek Blogitics, Unity, Vice President, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Bringing Hillary Clinton to the Obama ticket as VP would be like standing a lion next to a pussy cat, respectively.

    Like I said before. Smart politicians who don't want a failed-run-as-Obama VP on their resume' will say "thanks but no thanks". In Hillary's case, she would land Obama a win but from then on his political life would be a mere shadow of hers. She is too potent, too strong, too experienced. How would it look for Obama's image to be constantly in the shadow of his better?

    Girls know this one: If you're going out to impress the guys, bring along a dowdy, frumpy plain girl to pal around with. Automatically you will be "the pretty one"...lol..

    Obama will pick a plain, boring VP to shine in contrast to. He does depend on the shine to rope 'em in. What else does he have?

    So again, look for a lot of "thanks but no thanks" from people he picks for his doomed-from-September-on campaign. And look for Hillary at the convention, but not standing as his VP running mate.
    • ^
    • v
    "She is too potent, too strong, too experienced."

    Or is knocking back shots a sign she can "play with the big boys"


    I'll let Govtrack give the hard numbers:
    Statistics: Hillary Clinton has sponsored 376 bills since Jan 22, 2001, of which 323 haven't made it out of committee (Extremely Poor) and 10 were successfully enacted (Very Good, relative to peers). Clinton has co-sponsored 1846 bills during the same time period (Average, relative to peers). [On 4/2/08, the numbers were updated to consider companion bills in the other chamber identified as "identical" by the Congressional Research Service when determining if a bill was enacted or made it past the introduction stage.]

    link to page:
    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=3...

    so peer-wise, she's passable, average,not "potent".
    and as for Obama, about the same given his amount of time.

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=4...

    so really it's just pot calling kettle the same ( copper, cast iron, you name it) then isn't it.


    and she did what, as First Lady? Stand by her man? Well she did sponsor a serial skirt-chaser Bill.


    America needs a brand new bag, not more baggage.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.