« Why we overreact
Obama Drama and the McCain Drain »



Nearly 50 Edwards Backers Endorse Obama

April 23rd, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

Former Senator John Edwards hasn’t endorsed a candidate yet and rumors (just that at this point) continue to swirl that his wife Elizabeth Edwards could be on the verge of endorsing Senator Hillary Clinton. But now some 50 Edwards backers have come out for Senator Barack Obama:

No, John Edwards has not yet endorsed a candidate.

But nearly 50 of his most prominent backers lined up behind Senator Barack Obama today, in a gesture designed to give Mr. Obama a heavy boost of support less than two weeks before the North Carolina primary on May 6.

The group includes Ed Turlington, Mr. Edwards’s former national general campaign chairman; three North Carolina members of Congress; and 46 local activists, philanthropists and business leaders, among others. (Not surprisingly, given Mr. Edwards’s background, the list holds the names of 20 lawyers.)

Mr. Turlington, speaking from his law office in Raleigh, said that he had not expected to endorse a candidate after Mr. Edwards dropped out of the race on Jan. 30.

“I thought I was going to be on the sidelines,” Mr. Turlington said, adding that he made the decision about 10 days ago, after speaking to Mr. Obama. “I think his candidacy is doing a lot of important things that are similar to themes that John Edwards ran on.”

Is this a sign that some Democrats want to see this over? But will it be over? Or is this destined no matter what happens to fought all the way to the convention?



This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008 at 1:42 pm and is filed under Democratic Party, Primaries, North Carolina, John Edwards, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 4 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    The 50 Edwards folks may have some local clout but none on a national level -- in my humble opinion.

    The national clout is with Elizabeth Edwards. If, and I underscore if, Elizabeth Edwards endorses Hillary Clinton it will force female fence sitters to go with Hillary. Elizabeth Edwards is held in the highest esteem Nationally by a broad range of women and her endorsement -- and especially if she campaigns for Clinton -- will push many over to the Clinton camp.

    I was an Edwards supporter, a fence sitter, fully supported Obama and now lean towards him the longer this campaign goes on. If Elizabeth Edwards supports Hillary or Obama it will be a major endorsement and bring in lots of women's votes.
    • ^
    • v
    "The 50 Edwards folks may have some local clout but none on a national level -- in my humble opinion."

    It's just a cheering point for the more naive, idealistic Obama kids. Obama is the leader, still, but it's a much closer race than the conceited claim, and Clinton has not yet reached the point where she has to see her campaign in the same light as Albert Speer saw prospects for his nation and its war in, oh, early 1945. Not yet.
    • ^
    • v
    I agree with the post that said this move is designed to give Obama a boost before NC. Sure I could care less (as I sit here in California) if Mr. Turlington whoever of Raleigh, NC endorses Obama. But the support of a lot of NC business leaders and attorneys will influence the NC vote. And it's these votes that count on May 6 when NC votes, and not what the national polls say.

    While the endorsement by these leaders may influence the outcome in NC, DLS is right that a lot of naive Obama supporters will use this as a reason to cheer . On the one hand it is a cheering point, but most importantly we need to keep this in perspective.

    Reaching the nomination is like climbing a ladder and this endorsement definitely helps Obama up a rung. But Obama still has to make the effort to reach the top.
    • ^
    • v
    It is sad John Edwards won't come out and endorse Obama when it matters most, prior to the North Carolina primary. It would be ashame if the "good ol boy" mentality of the time of his childhood of always keeping women and Blacks in their place is the 'thing' his ego just can't get over. He wouldn't be the first white male politician from the north or south to feel this way. His endorsement at best would have been a positive and obvious approval of the candidate he showed in debate after debate he had the most in common with. To hear his wife is considering endorsing Clinton is not only a bad indication of who John Edwards might endorse but it just doesn't make any sense.

    Sour Grapes is the real issue here in my opinion as I'm sure it still smarts that he could not beat Obama in any state before he dropped out of the race and only faired better once against Clinton, if I'm not mistaken, in Iowa. Clinton and her team planned poorly in the beginning and underestimated Obama. Edwards and his people did an even worse job overall and paid the price. If he doesn't endorse now with a majority of his original supporters, it will be just another indicator of his lack of judgement, planning and forsight. After North Carolina any importance held by Edwards of his endorsement will only be relavant to whom he gives his super delegate vote to.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Why we overreact
Obama Drama and the McCain Drain »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.