« The Carville Flap: Another Illustration of ‘the Clinton Rules’ in Action
Around The Campaign 2008 Sphere March 30, 2008 »



Novak: 2008 Is Hillary Clinton’s Last Chance For Democratic Presidential Nomination

March 29th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

Conservative columnist Robert Novak has an item that suggests Senator Hillary Clinton could have problems if the emerging conventional wisdom is correct and she goes for the Democratic nomination in 2012 should Senator Barack Obama be the nominee and lose:

Al Gore, despite the lowest political pro file, is talked about among prominent Democrats as their leading candidate for 2012 if they fail this year.

The Democratic consensus is that there will be no second chance for Sen. Hillary Clinton. She is blamed for wounding Sen. Barack Obama so severely that he might fail in November.

Gore has kept out of the 2008 Democratic presidential contest, in contrast to his embarrassing 2004 endorsement of front-runner Howard Dean just before Dean flamed out. Since then, Gore’s prestige in Democratic ranks has soared while winning the Nobel Peace Prize and Hollywood’s Academy Award. He will be 64 in 2012.

That makes a great deal of sense. I haven’t been able to quite figure out how it stands to reason that if Obama gets the nomination, and a lot of the material and charges used by the Clinton campaign are used to defeat Obama, AND if Clinton voters stay home in enough numbers for Obama to lose, Clinton is automatically in line to get the nomination in 2012. If she gets it, the process will likely be as unpretty as what we’re seeing in the primaries.

There IS a precedent on the GOP side: Ronald Reagan’s challenge of President Gerald Ford is considered by some to have contributed to Ford’s defeat 1976 and Reagan came back four years later to capture the nomination. But Reagan was a “movement” candidate. Clinton is more a “machine” candidate.

Additionally, a large chunk of the emerging current press coverage with its conventional wisdom focuses on (a) a belief that Clinton can’t win and should drop out (Obama has noted she has a right to stay in the race and Clinton now insists she will fight all the way to the convention) and (b) many reports that the Clinton campaign has a specific strategy to raise Obama’s negatives so he is unelectable by convention time.

Couple that with persistent comments from the Clintons praising GOP likely nominee Senator John McCain — Bill Clinton has now made yet another one – and it’s clear the Reagan-Ford battle was an entirely different animal.

When Reagan challenged Ford, there was no huge clamor for him to drop out on the grounds that his case was perceived as useless and it was never reported that his campaign strategy was to raise Ford’s negatives so Ford was un-reelectable,

In other words: as Novak notes, it is highly likely that this is indeed Hillary Clinton’s last real chance. She could still win in 2012 but she will face a party peppered with a lot of new enemies in it that she did not have at the start of Campaign 2008 — when it began in earnest in 2007.

Enter Al Gore?



This entry was posted on Saturday, March 29th, 2008 at 11:21 pm and is filed under Democratic Party, Al Gore, Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Negative Campaigning, Bill Clinton, Elections, Democrats, 2008 Elections, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John McCain, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    many reports that the Clinton campaign has a specific strategy to raise Obama’s negatives so he is unelectable by convention time.

    it has been done to Hillary since the remote thought that she might somehow influence politics entered everyones mind.

    Already the Obama camp is starting the smear about McCain and his war record. Making fun in an ugly way about almost everything he says and does.

    WHY?WHY? Is Obama suddenly immune to all this. Why do we cry havoc and let slip the dogs of unjustice when his negatives are talked about, put forward and discussed.

    Why? Because the progressive/antiwar who are Barak Obamas biggest supporters learned over the course of the last 5 years how to destroy anything that stands in their way. Republicans who once stood up to them have been beaten down with the truth.

    The horrid fear is that we will learn the truth about a candidate with no record that just popped up from the inner city of Chicago and whose benefactors are Oprah Winfrey.....and tony something or other..Jeremiah Wright. Whose chruch is apparently racist but we are not allowed to talk about that. Whose house was perhaps funded with ill gotten gains, but were not allowed to talk about that. Who has voted lock step with Democrats but promises us to include Republicans but were not allowed to talk about that.

    Any single negative about this man is turned into we are racist bigots filled with scum.

    Why is it such a travesty to not be able to dig into Obama's life? We are being asked to accept him on faith.

    I question everything about this man. Because we cannot scrutinize him. Because nothing sticks to him because from day one he came out and preached until we all thought it the truth that no matter what you hear about me.

    Its all lies.

    No matter what they say.

    They are trying to Bamboozle you.

    No matter how bleak things appear about me.

    They are all racists trying to hoodwink you.

    And we believed. I truly wonder who is the racist and who is the victim of racism in this primary? I wonder. I will be beaten down for daring to ask a question that is in the back of everyones mind.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« The Carville Flap: Another Illustration of ‘the Clinton Rules’ in Action
Around The Campaign 2008 Sphere March 30, 2008 »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.