Governor Spitzer Apologizes After New York Times Reveals Link To Prostitution Ring

March 10th, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

t1home.spitzer.presser.ap.jpg

New York Governor Eliot Spitzer, a rising star in the Democratic Party and a major force in his state until he hit some rocky political bumps, has now apologized after a New York Times report linked him to a prostitution ring.

According to the Times, he was caught on a federal wiretap.

His apology has the feeling of one shoe dropping. Because it’s likely the other shoe will drop soon. It’s likely that pressure will build on him to resign — and that could have multi-faceted impacts on New York, the Democratic Party and perhaps even the Presidential race (he is a Hillary Clinton Superdelegate).

The latest from CNN:

Gov. Eliot Spitzer said he “acted in way that violates his obligation to his family,” speaking hours after the New York Times reported he told senior administration officials he had been involved in a prostitution ring.

“I apologize first and most importantly to my family. I apologize to the public, to whom I promised better,” he said.

He did not elaborate on the paper’s claims and did not take any questions after making his statement.

“I am disappointed that I failed to live up to the standard I expected of myself,” he said

The paper’s Web site cited an anonymous administration official and said the New York governor met with his top aides before making his statement.

“To say this is a shock is an understatement,” said CNN senior legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin, who went to law school with Spitzer.

Spitzer served as New York’s attorney general for eight years before being elected governor.

Time magazine named him “Crusader of the Year” during his two terms as New York attorney general.

Tabloids labeled him “Eliot Ness,” after the hero in the crime drama “The Untouchables,” because of his reputation for rooting out corruption, busting white-collar criminals and tackling organized crime.

Here’s the opening of the New York Times investigative piece:

Gov. Eliot Spitzer has been caught on a federal wiretap arranging to meet with a high-priced prostitute at a Washington hotel last month, according to a person briefed on the federal investigation.

The wiretap recording, made during an investigation of a prostitution ring called Emperors Club VIP, captured a man identified as Client 9 on a telephone call confirming plans to have a woman travel from New York to Washington, where he had reserved a room. The person briefed on the case identified Mr. Spitzer as Client 9.

The governor learned that he had been implicated in the prostitution probe when a federal official contacted his staff last Friday, according to the person briefed on the case.

The governor informed his top aides Sunday night and this morning of his involvement. He canceled his public events today and scheduled an announcement for this afternoon after inquiries from the Times.

The governor’s aides appeared shaken, and one of them began to weep as they waited for him to make his statement at his Manhattan office. Mr. Spitzer was seen leaving his Fifth Avenue apartment just before 3 p.m. with his wife of 21 years, Silda, heading to the news conference.

The Swamp:

There is nothing quite like a sex scandal to stop a successful politician in his tracks.

Particularly a politician such as Eliot Spitzer, the governor of New York who made his name as an aggressive prosecutor of corporate fraud and organized crime and now tells his staff that he personally has been involved in a prostitution ring.

Spitzer, a Democrat elected governor of The Empire State in 2006, apparently has spent some time around the Emperors Club VIP…

…. Politicians have survived sex scandals, of course. Former President Clinton, who at first denied his sexual involvement with a White House intern, stands as the most memorable example in recent times. And Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho, arrested in an airport men’s room, has resisted calls for his resignation.

But so much of Spitzer’s persona is invested in his own enforcement of the law – combatting white-collar crime and securities fraud as a state attorney general and organized crime as a prosecutor in New York City – that the admission of involvement in prostitution leaves little room for movement in a political arena unforgiving of hypocrisy.

You can almost predict some of the reaction. This will give talk show hosts a chance to talk about the Democrats and sex scandals (although the Republicans have had some of their own). Bill Clinton’s name will come up (isn’t it getting a little OLD?).

But the bottom line is that the Democratic Party has clearly lost one of its up-and-coming stars.

It’ll be hard to run as a Democrat with a Elliot Ness image because — according to the Times — this Elliot Ness was touchable.

Read lots of blog reaction HERE.

UPDATE: More details about the service.

This entry was posted on Monday, March 10th, 2008 at 11:43 am and is filed under Superdelegates, Eliot Spitzer, New York, Scandals, Democrats, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Obama Points Out Clinton Contradiction In Suggestion Of Obama Vice President »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.