« ‘With Palin, U.S. Right Revisits Dan Quayle and ‘Murphy Brown’: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
Who is Sarah Palin? »



Sarah Palin will change the way government does business

September 6th, 2008
By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor

Print Print

And let’s face it, she has some experience in this area. In fact, Sarah Palin has apparently made some major changes in the way Sarah Palin does business, and has done so in only six months. Buried at the very end of this Washington Post article on Palin’s somewhat-dubious history as a champion in fighting the “old boys network” regarding pork-barrel spending comes this little-noted statistic.

In February, Palin’s office sent Sen. [Ted] Stevens a 70-page memo outlining almost $200 million worth of new funding requests for Alaska.

For the benefit of those who may have been living under a rock for the last year, Stevens is the Republican “King of Pork” currently cooling his heels while awaiting trial on charges involving the receipt of “unreported gifts.”

The linked article is a good read for anyone interested in Palin’s history as a government reformer. Her copious comments about the time she spent as mayor of the small town of Wasilla don’t generally include some of the serious changes she made in her home town’s government and how they do business. Some examples:

Pre-Palin: Palin was elected mayor of Wasilla in 1996 on a campaign theme of “a time for change.” According to a review of congressional spending by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group in Washington, Wasilla did not receive any federal earmarks in the first few years of Palin’s tenure.

Post-Palin: Sarah Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town of 6,700 residents while she was its mayor

Pre-Palin: The town of Wasilla had no long-term debt.

Post-Palin: Wasilla was approximately $22M in debt and was saddled with a sports center of dubious fiscal merit built on land to which the town did not hold clear title as construction was beginning, while still not having a waste treatment facility.

On the day that Governor Palin was announced as John McCain’s choice as running mate, she proudly told the world, “As governor, I’ve stood up to the old politics-as-usual, to the special interests, to the lobbyists, the big oil companies, and the good-ol’-boy network.” However, Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, wryly noted:

“She certainly wasn’t shy about putting the old-boy network to use to bring home millions of dollars. She’s a little more savvy to the ways of Washington than she’s let on.”

Palin recently made the wise decision to throw Stevens and the Bridge to Nowhere under the bus when it was clearly becoming a political liability. (Previously she had told the target island’s residents that she was running a “build the bridge” campaign.) Is this the track record of someone who has a long history of fighting pork and wasteful spending? Six months ago she was sending a War-and-Peace-sized request to Ted Stevens with her hand out for several hog-sized portions at the government feed bag. Did she undergo some major revelation in the last 180 days causing her to see the light? Or might she actually be “just another Alaska politician” who is conveniently re-packaging herself again to be as salable as possible on the McCain ticket?

I had originally criticized the wisdom of Big Mac selecting Palin based on her limited experience. But now, if McCain was looking for someone to help him “change the way government works,” I guess he went with the experienced candidate after all.



This entry was posted on Saturday, September 6th, 2008 at 8:29 am and is filed under Change, Sarah Palin, Newsweek Blogitics, John McCain, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 6 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« ‘With Palin, U.S. Right Revisits Dan Quayle and ‘Murphy Brown’: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
Who is Sarah Palin? »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.