« About ‘Gay’. And some speculation on why the Religious Right insists we’re ‘homosexual’
Campaign Advice For Barack Obama: Forget About The Center? »



The Obamacans and McCainocrats And The Pitch To Centrists

July 3rd, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief


What do Democratic Senator Barack Obama and Republican Senator John McCain have in common? Both presumptive Presidential nominees are trying to appeal to the center while they try to consolidate support from their parties’ bases.

John Avlon, a top centrist who worked for both former President Bill Clinton and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, takes a look at this race to scoop up centrist voters in a MUST READ piece on The Politico. Some key excerpts:

In the past, we have seen Eisenhower Democrats and Reagan Democrats, even Republicans for Bill Clinton in 1992. This year, two new terms are entering the political lexicon: Obamacans and McCainocrats. They testify to the way old labels are giving way to new evolutions as the political map edges toward realignment.

A new Gallup poll shows that nearly one-in-four U.S. voters is now a “swing voter” — a higher percentage than at any time in the polarizing 2004 election. Barack Obama and John McCain are each appealing to around 10 percent of the other party’s voters, according to a June Fox/Opinion Dynamics poll.

Even so, there are partisans in both parties who are pooh-poohing the idea that swing voters matter and even have name for them: “the mushy middle.”

But both Obama and McCain share one other thing in common: they do not want to lose and know that they cannot win if they ignore swing voters.

Avlon also notes something I’ve written about here.

There are Big Broom voters who want to sweep away parts of the old political establishment order — and they represent potentially potent constituencies for McCain and Obama:

There are two main strains to the Obamacan phenomenon: people who are inspired by Obama’s post-partisanship, and those who want a complete blood transfusion for the GOP brand after the days of President Bush, Karl Rove and Tom DeLay.

And he notes that some key Republicans have already defected from the GOP fold:

This is not a fringe festival — Republicans who now support Obama count among their ranks Ike’s granddaughter Susan Eisenhower; Milton Friedman’s son, David; former Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-R.I.); conservative legal scholar Douglas Kmeic; and Reagan’s assistant secretary of defense, Lawrence J. Korb.

Despite all the defections, McCain is the strongest candidate Republicans could hope for this year. The man is a walking profile in courage, the antidote to everything Tom DeLay stood for.

Avlon is correct - -and it is heresy to write that in some quarters. But McCain is not Tom Delay or the present George Bush. That message, though, is now being blurred with some of McCain’s stances as he moves to the right to keep his base — and with recent news that Karl Rove’s proteges have high posts in his campaign while Rove himself is an “informal” campaign adviser.

Avlon thinks national security could be McCain’s trump card and notes websites of Democrats supporting McCain, then adds:”But to a troubling extent, the grass-roots McCain Democrat websites are more anti-Obama than pro-McCain.”

Even so, Avlon’s argument is that if you cut away all the political screaming and posturing this year IS different with two candidates who ARE different who DO offer a chance to shift America from the mega-polarization political wars:

These flashes of anger distracts from the larger fact that both Obama and McCain defined their candidacies early around ending hyper-partisanship in Washington. That’s at the heart of their ability to appeal across the aisle. This election offers a healthy competition for votes in the center of the political spectrum, a rare opportunity for Americans to choose the candidate they like best, not the candidate they dislike least. The winner will give crossover voters something to vote for — rather than just someone to vote against.

Read it in its entirety.



This entry was posted on Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Bush Administration, Democratic Party, Independents, Republican Party, Change, Newsweek Blogitics, John McCain, Barack Obama, Centrists, 2008 Elections, Independent Voters, Democrats, Republicans, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« About ‘Gay’. And some speculation on why the Religious Right insists we’re ‘homosexual’
Campaign Advice For Barack Obama: Forget About The Center? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.