« The Conservative Reformation: ‘Stops’
From Germany’s Der Tagesspiegel: ‘For Obama, There’s a Better Place than the Brandenburg Gate!’ »



Bob Barr Conference Call Today

July 17th, 2008
By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor

Print Print

Several of us got the chance to talk to Bob Barr today on a conference call. I found the candidate to be highly engaging and ready to reach out to bloggers and the new media in any way that he can. Below are a few of the topics covered and the answers given.

Q. What does it mean to you to run as a 3rd party candidate?

Barr hopes to accomplish three things. He feels that the political climate is sour, people are sour on government and their choices in candidates and that the two party system is not serving them well. He recognizes that he’s a long shot, but still believes he can win in a three way race. Second, he would like to “open the electorates eyes” to the fact that they do not need to be “bound to the artificial constraints of a two party system“. And last, he would like the opportunity to discuss the issues in a more fundamentally constitutional way with the voters.

Q. How would you make substantive cuts in the size of the government?

Barr would lead by example, ordering an immediate 10% cut in the Executive office for personnel and spending. Further, he would ask Congress, (both parties) to start cutting costs or “they will be next“. Any bill that increases the national debt will be vetoed. No increases in appropriations for any office will be tolerated. He would immediately put a freeze on all federal spending. He would also eliminate the Dept. of Education, reduce the size and scope of the Dept. of Energy, and establish a commission similar to the Grace Commission under Ronald Reagan. This group would examine every department and agency to determine their constitutionally based identity and function and prioritize eliminating those that don’t meet muster.

Q. How do you get to 270 votes?

Barr plans to focus on a number of states and regions which are most likely to attract independent, libertarian voters. Mountain West states will be a key, along with areas of the Southeast, such as his home state of Georgia, etc.

Q. How would you deal with the situation between Israel and Iran?

Israel is and will remain a very strong ally, but we don’t need expanded hostilities in that region. Barr mentions his close ties with the CIA and states that Iran is not close to posing an immediate threat to anyone in the form of ICBMs or nukes. It’s a concern, and needs to be a factor in our national security policies, but we shouldn’t be looking toward any sort of hostilities.

That was most of it for today. We will try to get some more information from the Barr campaign as we go forward.

UPDATE: Ed Morrissey and James Joyner were also on the call and you can check out their impressions.



This entry was posted on Thursday, July 17th, 2008 at 11:54 am and is filed under Bob Barr, Newsweek Blogitics, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    People are sour on this particular government, for several vastly different reasons.
    1) The government does too much
    2) The governmetn does too much of the wrong things
    3) The govenment doesn't do enough
    4) The government doesn't do enough of the right things

    Barr's people who are sour on the government aren't necessarily Barr's people.
    • ^
    • v
    I would have appreciated a firmer committment on Mr.Barr's part to total military and political disengagement in the mideast. Israel has shown that it can defend itself without American assistance, but it's status as an American "ally" enormously complicates relations with other countries in the area, including the Palestinians.

    Bringing our land, sea and air forces home, and ceasing our diplomatic and financial meddling in the area, even in the elusive goal of "peace" would allow the people and governments there to sort things out and reach agreement if such agreement is possible. In all events, Mr. Barr, as the Libertarian candidate, should have emphasised the advantages of military and political non-intervention for Americans, and in ceasing subsidies and foreign aid to the various combatants in that troubled region of the world.

    PEACE AND FREEDOM!
    David K. Meller
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« The Conservative Reformation: ‘Stops’
From Germany’s Der Tagesspiegel: ‘For Obama, There’s a Better Place than the Brandenburg Gate!’ »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.