Image-Damaged Bill Clinton Will Be Used Sparingly By Obama Presidential Campaign

June 6th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

clinton.jpg

A report in the New York Daily News suggests that former President Bill Clinton, whose red-faced outbursts and angry comments peppered with inaccuracies and controversy-sparking assertions are believed to have hurt his wife’s Presidential campaign, may have exploded himself out of a large campaign role in presumptive Democratic Presidential nominee Senator Barack Obama’s battle for the White House.

According to the report, Clinton may be used sparingly by the Obama campaign because he’s now considered too much of a loose cannon and doesn’t have the same image he had as when the campaign season started:

The Obama camp is preparing to embrace Hillary Clinton enthusiastically - but they’re reaching for the 10-foot pole to keep her rabid husband at bay.

Bill Clinton’s erratic and increasingly sulfuric behavior on the campaign trail has perplexed senior Barack Obama campaign officials trying to figure out how to deploy him in the fall campaign.

While the former President’s political skills are extraordinary, some senior Democratic and Obama officials - and Hillary Clinton aides - believe he is now simply too toxic to be a high-profile surrogate.

“Before all the controversy there were plenty of things he could have done, but he’s definitely a liability now,” a Democratic operative with close ties to Obama Nation told the Daily News.

“She will campaign her heart out and be a huge asset for Obama,” the source predicted. “But he needs to just stay out of it.”

The report says that — in the ironies or ironies — Bill Clinton could wind up playing the same role for the Democrats that President George Bush now plays for the Republicans: he can be useful at fund raising events but will not be given a blank check to go out on the stump and campaign for his party’s candidates as he wishes.

A senior Obama adviser, however, said Bill Clinton and Obama were likely to appear together in rural areas, where blue-collar white voters favored Hillary overwhelmingly.

“He could have been a great attack dog on [John] McCain,” the source lamented. “He was rehabilitated, a total rock star, leader of the Democratic Party and an elder statesman. All of that is gone. There’s a lot of consensus on that in the party.”

It’s clear that this report is a kind of send-a-message-to-Bill since, as it notes, the Obama campaign is now in quintessential reach-out-and-acknowledge-your-formal-rivals mode. When asked by reporters about Bill Clinton, Obama notes that he’s a major talent.

But it’s clear that the Obama campaign has concluded that a little bit of a potentially red-faced Bill Clinton goes a long, long way — and that some supporters of Hillary Clinton think her husband has even scuttled her chances of being on the ticket as Obama’s running mate.

Some Hillary partisans believe the former President’s outbursts not only certified his reputation as a gifted loose cannon - they doomed his wife’s chances of becoming Obama’s running mate.

“He poisoned it for her,” a senior Hillary campaign adviser told The News.

As noted here on TMV before, part of Bill Clinton’s problem is imagery.

He remains idolized by many Democratic partisans, but his political stock with many Democrats has gone down due to his behavior in the primaries. He remains anathema to many Republicans. But while most ex-Presidents see their image grow once they leave office as they become symbolic of the office of the Presidency, Bill Clinton morphed into becoming one more strident, spinning member of a political machine — someone more like a screaming guest on Sean Hannity’s show than an ex President.

Some analysts and experts are still trying to explain Bill Clinton’s behavior. Some think it was his highly emotional reaction to his wife seeking the big prize. Others think it was frustration since he and his wife were a bit out of sync with 21st century politics and changes in both the general electorate and the Democratic party. Still others argue that Bill Clinton was negatively impacted by his open heart surgery.

Regardless of the true explanation, in Campaign 2008 Obama campaign will want to use the “good part” of the “good Bill Clinton” in Obama’s campaign — and keep the other one locked up tightly in Al Gore’s famous “lock box.”




This entry was posted on Friday, June 6th, 2008 at 5:35 am and is filed under Bill Clinton, Elections, Democratic Party, Newsweek Blogitics, Negative Campaigning, John McCain, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, Democrats, Republicans, Hillary Clinton, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.