Poll: In Tight Clinton Obama Campaign Bill Clinton Hurting Hillary

March 13th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

A new poll brings good news for Republican presumptive Presidential nominee Senator John McCain, troubling news for the Democratic Party, slightly good news for Democratic Senator Barack Obama — and a sign that the best thing Hillary Clinton could do for her campaign now would to lock her husband Bill Clinton away in a room:

There’s a new poll out today from the Wall Street Journal/NBC News that shows support for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama has remained tight nationally, with Obama edging ahead within the margin of error. There’s good news in the poll for Republicans — voters seem to like John McCain more than they like the Republican Party in general, suggesting a tighter race than the Democrats are hoping for.

Why? Some previous polls have shown that even if some Democrats and independents don’t agree with McCain, he appeals to them. Part of it his that he still apparently has some credibility in the bank as a “maverick,” a phrase many progressives think is inaccurate since McCain is promising continuity on many policies now followed by the Bush administration. Part is his life story. And the other part is that he comes across well on the tube.

But a more interesting nugget is buried deep in the poll. It seems that the more voters see of Bill Clinton, the less they like him. The poll shows a significant shift in his approval rating from a year ago. In March 2007, some 48% of those surveyed had a positive view of the former president, and 35% had a negative view. Now his negatives outpace his positives, 45% to 42%.

That means that in this highly-polarized political environment, the former President has started to turn off Obama supporters and independents (Republicans have been turned off by him for years).

Over the same time span, Hillary Clinton’s positive numbers rose from 39% to 45% while her negatives remained static, sliding up from 43% to 44%,

That’s progress on the positives.

As for Obama, the more voters saw of him — or, at least the more they learned about him — the more they liked him. In March 2007 his positive numbers were 37% and his negatives were 17%. But some 26% said they were “neutral” about him and 20% said they didn’t know — nearly half of those surveyed. Now, Obama’s positive-negative numbers are 51% to 28% with only 18% neutral and 3% undecided.

So he is coming across as highly likable to most voters — and, if past elections are any indication, the likability factor matters. In general elections. In a Democratic Presidential nomination, what matters is getting the delegates (apparently, no matter how you get them).




This entry was posted on Thursday, March 13th, 2008 at 9:38 am and is filed under Bill Clinton, Elections, Approval Ratings, Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, John McCain, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, Polls, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 4 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.