Dow Drops 680 Points Amid Recession Confirmation

December 1st, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

The Dow Jones industrial average plunged 680 points today as a report confirmed that the United States is in a recession and a key manufacturing index fell to a 26-year low.

CNN reports:

Stocks got hammered Monday, as investors bailed out on confirmation that the U.S. is in a recession and indications that it’s likely to continue for some time.

Treasury prices rallied, lowering the corresponding yields. Oil and gold prices plunged. The dollar tumbled versus the yen and gained against the euro.

The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) lost 680 points, its fourth-biggest single-session decline on a point basis ever, according to early tallies. The decline was 7.7% in percentage terms, the 12th worst percentage one-day decline ever.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 (SPX) index fell 8.9% and the Nasdaq composite (COMP) gave up 9%.

Stocks slid throughout the morning as investors eyed a report showing manufacturing in the United States has slumped. But the selling accelerated in the afternoon after an official declaration of the recession - and dour comments from government officials.

Additionally, the market was primed for a selloff after last week’s run, analysts said. After hitting multi-year lows a little over a week ago, the S&P 500 rallied 19% through last Friday, while the Dow and Nasdaq both gained just under 17%.

“We’re going to continue to see this extreme volatility because there’s no clear end in sight to all the crises,” said Dean Barber, president at Barber Financial Group.

In a report released Monday, the National Bureau of Economic Research confirmed what many have long believed - that the nation is in a recession. According to the NBER, the official body that calls economic cycles, the U.S. has been in a recession since December 2007.

Speaking in the afternoon, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said that the economic weakness will continue for some time, despite the impact of the government’s efforts to get money flowing again.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, speaking at a Fortune 500 forum in the afternoon, said the downturn was significant. He also said that the federal government is looking to expand the financial rescue program.

…The Institute for Supply Management said its November manufacturing index fell to a 26-year low of 36.2 from 38.9 in October. That was worse than what economists were expecting, according to a survey from Briefing.com.

The economy see saw has provoked one of the sillier spectacles in American politics — if that is actually possible in light of the silliness mega-trend in 21st century American political partisan rhetoric.

Partisans on BOTH sides are now attributing upturns to their side and downturns to the other. Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh point to stock market tumbles as signs of an “Obama recession” –even though President-Elect Barack Obama has not been in power for one second yet. And, strangely, they remain silent if the stock market goes up — not attributing any gain to the supposed powers Obama had in making it go down when it went down.

Similarly, some Democratic sympathizers and Obama supporters point to stock market gains as proof that Obama is reassuring the markets, but have no proclamation when the markets go down.

The reality: right now one President is in power and one President-Elect isn’t. The reality: a slew of factors are contributing to the stock market’s rises and falls and they have to do with poor decisions on the part of key actors in various segments of the economy and government. The reality: the economy has worsened while one administration has been in charge for 8 years. The reality: the opposition party got control of Congress two years ago but the party controlling the White House had it most of the other 8 years.

The reality: the see-saw continues…and there is enough bipartisan blame to go around.




This entry was posted on Monday, December 1st, 2008 at 4:43 pm and is filed under Barack Obama, Financial Crisis, George W. Bush, Economy, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    (Recession _admission_, now that the election results are evident and problems with the financial institutions cannot be concealed)
    • ^
    • v
    Yes, they are just admitting what all America has known for months, though Bush is now blaming Wall Street, and not his inability to respond to multiple warnings from economists about the looming foreclosure crisis. The truth is that there was ample warning. but the administration caved in to banking lobbyists who did not want any regulations on issuing risky loans. Just more evidence that market forces alone do not suffice in an atmosphere of avarice and greed. The banks and automakers were well-aware that we couldn't allow them to face the consequences of their disasterous decision-making.

    How sad that consumer rights were circumvented during the last 8 years in favor of corporate interests!
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.