Laugh Factory Owner Says Jackson Should Pay Fine For N Word

July 18th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

_15619316_8072_42DA_8BEE_5C494D308F7D_.gif

Poor Jesse Jackson. It’s tough enough being caught with your verbal pants down in an unscripted moment using bad language about Democratic presumptive nominee Sen. Barack Obama, and then apologizing for it. And it’s even more of a downer when it later leaks out that, in an un-aired part of the off-the-air tape, you used the hated “N word” that you campaigned against anyone ever using again.

So you apologized once more as you watch more strands of your once-considerable national clout disintegrate during Campaign 2008. But now the owner of the popular Laugh Factory comedy club is refreshing everyone’s memory a bit more — and thinks that more than a verbal apology is in order:

When Michael Richards stunned a nightclub audience two years ago by shouting the N-word at a black patron, Laugh Factory owner Jamie Masada was quick to join the Rev. Jesse Jackson in calling for a ban on the word’s use.

Now that Jackson has let the word slip out, Masada says he wants the civil rights leader to do what comics do every time they say the word on a Laugh Factory stage — pay a fine.

“Unfortunately, Jesse Jackson has broken his own principles,” Masada told The Associated Press on Thursday. “Jesse embraced the notion of fining talent for using such a word and he should be held to his own standards.”

What? Holding someone to their own rhetorical standards?

If this standard was imposed on everyone, it could obliterate many talk show discussions, limit Obama’s and Republican presumptive nominee Sen. John McCain’s rhetoric, eliminate Democratic and Republican political party spin-masters on TV, curtail many partisans’ blog posts and shorten debates in the upcoming political campaign to a just few minutes. What a terrible idea.

Jackson’s latest attempt to defuse the deconstruction of the self-destruction of his decades-in-the-making image came after it was revealed by a website that the un-aired portion of the Fox News tape showed Jackson using the word N-word that Jackson so passionately and publicly had campaigned against being used.

The Laugh Factory owner said he fines comedians $50 each time they use the word in their act so he wants Jackson to cough up the same amount, which he says would be given to the Museum of Tolerance in LA. He told the AP that he banned the use of the word shortly after the Richards’ fiasco and that some comics do use the word, but quickly pay the fines.

Meanwhile, this debate isn’t over by a long shot:

–The issue has become: is it OK if blacks use it? The Chicago Sun TimesDeborah Douglas has a long must-read. Part of it:

I guess the Rev. Jesse Jackson and I have this in common. In a so-now-we-know moment this week, his full controversial off-mike comments on Fox News were leaked: “He’s talking down to black people . . . telling n - - - - - - how to behave,” said Jackson in the same tones he used in whispering about castrating Barack Obama.

Now hypocrite-watchers are pointing fingers at Jackson because this is the same guy who implored African Americans to avoid using the word. He called it a “hate” word. I can’t argue with them, so I won’t. The question is: Can I, should I, overcome my addiction to the n-word?

America has a complex relationship with that word. Dead presidents like Abraham Lincoln and Lyndon Johnson peppered their language with it daily to reinforce white hegemony, according to Jabari Asim’s The N Word: Who Can Say It, Who Shouldn’t and Why. It has been used as a sort of rhetorical glue to uphold institutional racism. Like most weapons, the word has been turned against its original users, and is now used by some African Americans as a term of endearment, chastisement, or like Jackson, an assumption of groupthink.

Conflicted, I’ve gone off the n-word in long stretches (along with meat, potato chips and candy bars) only to come back to it. I signed up for that a-word-a-day e-mail to boost my vocabulary. But sometimes I don’t want to use nice language. Sometimes it’s not enough to say, “I have a visceral antipathy to my boss’ viewpoint on X.” Given that I have a small voice, I don’t want folks misunderstanding that I really mean, “That’s damn crazy.”

Like many taboo words, the n-word is used as a cultural signifier.


Read the entire column.

–Jackson’s use of the word sparked a heated and (yet another) brimming-on-tears discussion on The View. Access Hollywood:

In a scene reminiscent of Rosie O’Donnell’s days on “The View,” hosts Elisabeth Hasselbeck and Whoopi Goldberg got into a heated exchange over the use of the “N” word on Thursday morning.

…“We live in a world where pop culture uses that term and we’re trying to get to a place where we feel like we’re in the same place,” Elisabeth said. “How are we supposed to then…move forward if we keep using terms that bring back such pain?”

“I can tell you how, here’s how we do it, you listen and say ‘Okay, this is how we’re using this word and this is why we do it,’ and you have to say, ‘I understand that, but let’s find a new way to move forward,’” Whoopi fired back.

“We don’t live in different worlds,” Elisabeth insisted, “We live in the same world.”

However, Whoopi fiercely disagreed with her co-host, saying, “We do live in different worlds, it’s just that way. It is Elisabeth.”

When Elisabeth became visibly upset, tearing up, Barbara Walters jumped in the middle of the disagreement.

“Take a breath, let someone else talk,” “The View” creator snapped.

–And Fox News then ran a video of The View talking about the video:

We’ll post the next video talking about the Fox News video talking about The View talking about the Jackson video as soon as it surfaces…

Black Voices writes this after posting the View video:
(which makes it the video about the video):

Anyone who thinks the move toward racial equality and harmony in this country rests on who uses or does not use the ‘n-word’ does not even begin to comprehend the kind of gut wrenching self examination and barrier blasting work it will take to build a color neutral society in America.

News Blaze looks at the use of the “n-word” by prominent people over the years and some consequences, and at the Jackson flap and who is defending him and concludes:

Which leads to the Big Question: Just how offensive is the “N” word?

The answer: It all depends on your race and political affiliation!


And the debate will go on.

Cartoon by Mike Lester, The Rome News-Tribune




This entry was posted on Friday, July 18th, 2008 at 7:04 am and is filed under Barack Obama, TV Shows, Black/African-American, Newsweek Blogitics, Democrats, Minorities, Television, Politics, 2008 Elections, Race, Entertainment. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Come on N's ... don't be ridiculous .. have you ever listened .. or TRIED to listen to black RAP music ... it' N-this and N-that . So JJ used it ... he's a N ... he can use it whenever he wants to. It's only when a non-N's use it is there is a problem. Believe me as a non-N ... there are greater tradegies in life.

    How about you stop pumping out all the N-kids and complaining about your ancestors that were slaves to get what you want ... Try doing your homework in school to better yourselves ... try staying together N-man and N-woman and being responsible for all your N-kids ... THOSE are your problems ... not being called an N. Most SMART educated successful N's don't care ...

    Most of you N's seem to be so F-ing hypocritical about all this. Grow up N's ... its only a word. I've been called worse ...
    8^(
    • ^
    • v
    To be more calm about this:

    It's a double standard. The word (which was long discouraged before 1965 and looked down on by most in this country as despicable and saying the same about its user) is the ultimate double-standard PC weapon and instance of hypocrisy that is one of the common defects in modern liberalism _and its legacy_. Nobody else dare use that word (it's an incitement to violence, truly, in most conditions) but it's okay for the objects of that word to use the word themselves with impunity.

    I just despise the typical left-PC hypocrisy when observing it; I'm not going to demand equal use any time soon or be a pioneering activist for such a cause.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.