« Obama, Clinton join McCain vs. earmarks
Lt. Governor Could Replace Spitzer in NY »



Hillary Clinton Now Downplays Talk Of Clinton-Obama Democratic Ticket

March 10th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

Should we call it “the trial balloon that quickly popped?” New York Senator Hillary Clinton, whose bigwig supporters — including her husband Bill — have touted a Clinton-Obama Democratic ticket’s glories is now expressing surprise that the talk (which started from her side) has taken on “a life of its own.”

It was given life by the Clinton side, Obama repeatedly and today bluntly turned it down and pointed out the contradictions between talking about him for No. 2 when Clinton has called him unprepared to answer a red phone and not yet “over the threshold” (like her and GOP future nominee Sen. John McCain.) So now you get this exchange between Clinton and ABC News’ Jake Trapper:

Her answer was quite strange, considering it’s been her camp fueling this buzz.

TAPPER: “Senator, how do you reconcile your suggestion that maybe Senator Obama would be appropriate to be on a Clinton-Obama ticket while at the same time you are suggesting that he isn’t prepared to be commander-in-chief?”

CLINTON: “Well this thing has really been given a life of its own. You know, a lot of Democrats like us both and have been very hopeful that they wouldn’t have to make a choice, but obviously Democrats have to make a choice and I’m looking forward to getting the nomination. And it’s premature to talk about whoever might be on whose ticket, but I believe that I am ready to serve on day one.”

It sounds as if the trial balloon deflated once analysts began wondering how Obama could ever be offered second spot, given the way he is being described by Clinton as essentially an empty suit who makes good speeches.

Also: Obama’s comments addressed this issue and he noted that he’s the one ahead in pledged delegates. In other words: it was opening a can of worms for the Clintons and their campaign — so they are now moving on.

But memories of the trial balloon — which some contend was floated to give the impression that Clinton is front-runner — will persist.

And it’s virtually certain there will be a move to get some kind of unity ticket — but it’s likely it’ll fail, given increasing bitterness between each campaign and their followers.



This entry was posted on Monday, March 10th, 2008 at 5:29 pm and is filed under Barack Obama, Newsweek Blogitics, Hillary Clinton, Democrats, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Joe,

    The reason Hillary is now downplaying the possibility of a joint ticket is likely because Obama has made multiple statements to the media that he isn't game.

    Side issue: pledged delegates matter, but there is no rule that super-delegates HAVE to vote as the nation's majority of pledged delegates did. Never has been. IN fact, the Obama campaigns present arguments are rather novel.

    Many super-delegetes are elected officials in their state. Why would any of them whose states voted for Hillary ignore their constituents and vote with the majorities of OTHER states? That's not what representation is about.

    This race has become so emotionally charged that lines are getting blurred and facts are being forgotten.
    • ^
    • v
    "There is no rule that super-delegates HAVE to vote as the nation's majority of pledged delegates did. "

    It's March 11. We're all very aware of that fact now. I'll remind you that there are thousands of legal, stupid moves in chess.

    However, what are the repercussions for the party if they overturn the vote expressing the will of the electorate. He's leading in delegates, the popular vote, and the polls. What will be the rationale? "We've decided we know better than you. Thank for 'voting' I'll see you in November when it really counts!" Shoot, there's no rule saying I can't live on a diet of cheese-whiz and krispy kremes, but that doesn't make that an intelligent or forward looking move for my future health.

    "Never has been. IN fact, the Obama campaigns present arguments are rather novel."

    I can't think of an example in modern politics where the superdelegates countermanded the voters.

    "Many super-delegetes are elected officials in their state. Why would any of them whose states voted for Hillary ignore their constituents and vote with the majorities of OTHER states? That's not what representation is about."

    Wait, so are you arguing that the superdelegates can vote however they want unless their constituents voted for Hillary? Oy vey.

    "This race has become so emotionally charged that lines are getting blurred and facts are being forgotten."

    We've all heard those talking points above, and haven't forgotten them. I'm not, nor is Obama or Clinton, arguing that the rules should change. But as a voter, I have every right to make sure my elected officials are very aware of what I want. That is the essential relationship and a voter and their elected officials. I don't just vote and then sit quietly in a corner.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Obama, Clinton join McCain vs. earmarks
Lt. Governor Could Replace Spitzer in NY »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.