« Buddy Miles (1947-2008)
The Metaphor of 12 Angry Men »



Hillary thinks she sees a vulnerability

February 29th, 2008
By POLIMOM

Print Print

Barely a day after The Nation’s Jeremy Scahill put out an article about Barack Obama’s position on private military contractors, Hillary Clinton has signed onto a bill banning their use:

“Washington, DC – Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton announced today that she has cosponsored legislation to ban the use of Blackwater and other private mercenary firms in Iraq.

Presumably she thinks she sees an exploitable opening in the Obama position. From The Nation:

“If Barack Obama comes into office next January and our diplomatic security service is in the state it’s in and the situation on the ground in Iraq is in the state it’s in, I think we will be forced to rely on a host of security measures,” said the senior adviser. “I can’t rule out, I won’t rule out, private security contractors.” He added, “I will rule out private security contractors that are not accountable to US law.”

I don’t think I’ve ever talked to a single person who likes the way the US has used private firms, and we’ve had a number of disastrous, controversial incidents involving them. That said — I believe Obama’s stance is correct. These contractors are fully integrated into every aspect of the operations in Iraq, and at this juncture, we cannot simply “ban” them. The most important immediate step we can take is to get them accountable (and evidently Obama already has legislation in motion for this).

Clinton’s move here looks to be both politically expedient and astoundingly naive.

I think she’s misplayed this badly, and I’ve written more about it here.



This entry was posted on Friday, February 29th, 2008 at 5:23 pm and is filed under Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, War. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 4 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Sounds desperate and dumb. Hillary knows better. I don't see that we have the forces to take over for the 100,000 (!) contract personnel in Iraq currently. Now that would be a hell of a surge. I think these contractors will threaten to pull out themselves if there's any attempt to make them accountable. What a stench this whole Iraq adventure has to it.
    • ^
    • v
    Thats not what the bill is. The majority of the "contractors" are not armed positions. The main direction would be the State department who use thousands of security personnel from "contractors" and those contractor should be a better set of guidelines and clear cut laws. Regardless the majority of contractors would stay in Iraq since they are not in the employ of the US but rather private companies and Iraq itself.
    • ^
    • v
    Once again, politics drives our policies from one extreme to another. I'm glad to see that Obama's statement avoids doing so.

    The contracting practices in Iraq are so chaotic that we really need to rethink tje whole mess in order to bring it under control. The State Dept has one set of guidelines, while the Defense Dept has another set. The process of subcontracting brings in contractors from other countries and no one seems to be
    taking responsibility for their actions while in Iraq. It's just all about the money, and nothing about responsibility.

    Obama is right, however, not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. The US governmetn simply can't replace the personnel provided by contractors. His own policy on this needs fleshing out, though. When foreigh nationals are involved, whose laws will prevail: the US, Iraq, who?
    It's the nebulous nature of the responsibility and accountability part of contracting that has led to the mess. That needs to be straightened out.
    • ^
    • v
    I'm not sure that Hillary as badly misplayed here. Obama has been able to exploit her as being tougher from an anti-war point of view. One aspect of limiting the contracting of private military firms in Iraq would be to force the Armed Forces into a reconfiguration of the troops deployed there, and possibly a drawdown of troops.

    I think Hillary and her people will be promoting this as "I'm already taking steps to end the war in Iraq, while Obama is still perpetuating it. Who is more likely to end it after taking office?"
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Buddy Miles (1947-2008)
The Metaphor of 12 Angry Men »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.