Update on the Prez Sex Scandal Rumor

November 1st, 2007 by SHAUN MULLEN, TMV Columnist

01ascandal.jpg

Like water trying to find its own level, or something, rumors that the Los Angeles Times is sitting on a sex scandal story about a certain presidential candidate that could blow the campaign wide open are percolating through the blogosphere.

As noted here yesterday, PajamasMedia blogger Ron Rosenbaum did a pretty good job of airing out the outlines of the “story,” as well doing some hankie wringing over the various dilemmas, ethical questions and other aspects of outing a politician – let alone a potential future president – over what some folks would argue is their own private business.

Let me say at this point that if the LAT rumor is true, I do not know who the subject of the story is, although I have my suspicions. But I also know that there has been a whispering campaign about the alleged extramarital behavior of a certain presidential candidate for some time and it’s not John Edwards. So there.

As the rumor bubbles hither and yon, it also is a pretty good bet that:

* The inevitable denial from a well-placed LAT source that such a story exists and a “this guy wouldn’t lie to me” endorsement from the blogger who obtained the denial will do nothing to stanch the rumor.

* The subject almost certainly is not a Republican because most of the bubbling is occurring on the conservative side of the blog pond, which is to say that pushing the “story” fits the agendas of said bloggers, although not necessarily Rosenbaum.

* The subject is a frontrunner and not an also-ran, which may explain the LAT’s hesitation, if there is even something to hesitate about. Then again . . .

* The rumor may be recycled and not new, which may explain the LAT’s hesitation, if there is even something to hesitate about. Then again . . .

* The alleged scandal is not so overt as to be obvious and may, in fact, be more a matter of appearance than reality.

*
Mentioning the rumor in even the most well-meaning context enhances its credibility. Example: Ed Morrissey, an influential conservative blogger, who says in a post titled “Keep Sitting on It” that he is foursquare against the LAT running the piece.

*
Bill “Slick Willie” Clinton’s turpitudes again will be aired out ad infinitum as some sort of benchmark. Which means that discussions of whether Vince Foster suicided or was offed cannot be far behind.

In the short term, the viability of the rumor — which is to say its lifespan — may well be determined not by how many bloggers like myself blather about it but when or whether the mainstream media picks it up.

Stay tuned, rumormongers. Stay tuned.

* * * * *

The photo is from a stage production of School For Scandal, a comedy of manners written by R.B. Sheridan and first performed in London in 1777.

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 1st, 2007 at 6:16 am and is filed under Scandals, Media, 2008 Elections. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Voice of Indian Muslims… »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.