‘Wrinkle in Time’ Author Dies »
By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:
(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.
(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.
(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.
(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.
(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.
(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:
(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.
(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.
(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.
(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.
(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.
(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.
(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.
Disclaimer:
--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.
--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.
--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.
--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.
Read and Post at your own risk.
September 8th, 2007 at 4:57 am
Please, this is an excuse for not catching him. And that interview by Thompson was terrible.
September 8th, 2007 at 4:58 am
Who is Fred Thompson? His message is a train wreck.
• He pulls contract with America out of one pocket, and he says ignore tort reform.
• He unravels an ancient screed of federalism, and he says forget about no child left behind.
• He squares up his Reagan mask, and McCain-Feingold wants to hoard the microphone from the money and voice of neophytes.
• He tap-dances to the tune of outsider, and the big, bold lights of the Federal City Council shine on him.
Now that he has the room thoroughly confused. He says no tax-cut pledges. Well, read my lips…no Fred Thompson.
September 8th, 2007 at 5:31 am
No Mike it’s not just an excuse to get him. If that’s how you think, it’s merely a signal that you’ve got no idea what you’re talking about.
September 8th, 2007 at 6:48 am
I think Fred would have been right two years ago, when Al Qaeda (the real one) and the Taliban were largely marginalized elements in the caves between Waziristan and Afghanistan. At that point Osama was little more than a symbol of global jihad. Al Qaeda was simply brand name, adopted by various local jidadi outfits from Indonesia to Sudan to Chechnya to, of course, Mesopotamia. Osama and Zawhiri had little more than rudimentary contact with these “franchisees;” if anything, it was to restrain their excess.
But I think that’s changed now, if all the Intelligence estimates out there are to be believed. The real Al Qaeda is much stronger as a central force now than it was two years ago. It has large safe havens in Waziristan, and it’s made terrifying progress in securing a foothold in southern Afghanistan. It seems only a matter of time before the Taliban retakes Qandahar in full. As such, Al Qaeda, Osama and Zawhiri have returned as a fully operational organization.
Osama Bin Laden is still a symbol, and perhaps his visage carries more power even today than his organizational capability. But while we fiddled away our army and our financial resources in the quicksand of Iraq, Al Qaeda replenished itself for the next campaign.
September 8th, 2007 at 9:11 am
I also have to agree with Fred on this.
September 8th, 2007 at 10:45 am
First, I tend to agree with Elrod. Secondly, one should never ever underestimate the value of a symbol in this kind of conflict.
September 8th, 2007 at 11:35 am
[…] Michael van der Galien states well: To provide some context to what Thompson said: “Bin Laden and people like him are […]
September 8th, 2007 at 3:13 pm
“No Mike it’s not just an excuse to get him. If that’s how you think, it’s merely a signal that you’ve got no idea what you’re talking about.”
Michael -Was your response to Mike rational discourse? You did not rebut his point, you just, in effect, called him a know nothing idiot. Remember, Bush promised to get Bin Laden “dead or alive”. He made a big deal of this and yet has not put much in the way of resources into catching or killing him.
Bin Laden is not irrelevent - here more than a symbol. His latest videotape will be motivating to tens of thousands of followers. Please note that the current German terror plot involved training in Pakistan and the Germans were taking orders from Pakistan. We’ll probably never know if Bin Laden was behind this particular plot but it sure has all the earmarks of AlQaeda.
I think it’s legitimate conjecture that we are not going after Bin Laden because we have too many resources tied up elsewhere and we know that Pakistan politics and the military challenges will make finding Bin Laden difficult. Bin Laden and ALQaeda are the primary threats to the world - not all the other bogeymen we have created.
Hezballah, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, the Sunni and Shia of Iraq and Iran have absolutely no interest in taking over the world or even causing trouble outside their neighborhoods.
September 8th, 2007 at 6:56 pm
The $20 is on the nightstand, because an the act of trying to fluff over the comment he made is tantamount to an editorial BJ LOL.
Bin Laden wether or not he’s the brains behind al Qaeda is the figurehead, and if anyone knows diddly squat about anything knows that head has to come off the beast to harm it. But leaving it there works alot better for the military contractors, and a decades to come war on terrorism the hawks salivate over huh?
Fredrick of Hollywood is a joke, and should stick to his one note character acting on a soundstage rather than the political forum, because when he speaks without the script he stinks big time.
September 8th, 2007 at 8:29 pm
Even, if, for the sake of argument, he were just a symbol, he would be a most powerful one. Just think of how much the cross or the American flag motivates people to action. A symbol can be a more powerful force than someone who actually functions as a leader.
I think the real reason we haven’t gotten bin Laden, is we fear the reaction throughout the Muslim world, where he is seen as a savior, and we are seen as evil incarnate. He has won over many followers just for standing up to the United States and fighting back against our policies.
By downplaying his importance, politicians like Fred Thompson try to downgrade expectations that bin Laden will be captured and eventually brought to justice. He simply knows what Clinton and Bush knew- that they couldn’t afford the repercussions of successfully hunting him down.
September 8th, 2007 at 10:08 pm
Bin Laden as a symbol would be just as powerful dead than alive, maybe more so. Never underestimate the power of a martyr.
After his latest video, some Muslims have crticized him for trimming his beard, so his star power may be fading. Some think, he has already been replaced in power by the #2 man in AQ, al Zawahari. That’s probably the man we should be concentrating on.
September 21st, 2007 at 3:09 pm
[…] to Michael van der Galien, a Dutchman who “loves” America and posts on Joe Gandelman’s “The Moderate Voice” HERE. Sadly, Michael used to post HERE, on The Democratic Daily, but his “moderate” […]
September 23rd, 2007 at 4:13 pm
[…] Malkin’s “props†to Michael van der Galien, a Dutchman who “loves†America and posts on Joe Gandelman’s “The Moderate Voice†HERE. Sadly, Michael used to post HERE, on The Democratic Daily, but his “moderate†credentials have […]