« Why I’ve Decided to Support Rudy
“I Veto, Therefore I Am” »



Behind Today’s Endorsements

November 7th, 2007
By PETE ABEL, Managing Editor

Print Print

Shaun Mullen beat me to the punch on the Robertson-Rudy endorsment, but there is another endorsement of some note in the GOP race: Brownback for McCain. Politico has the details on both.

And what are we to make of all this noise?

The Brownback-McCain pairing is logical and (though not yet official) may already be helping McCain who (discounting margins-of-error for the moment) seems to be edging into second place in national polls. According to RCP’s averaging of the polls — as of 9:15 a.m. CDT — the Senator from Arizona was a thumbnail’s width ahead of Thompson, 16.5 vs. 16.2 percent.

In contrast, the Robertson-Rudy pairing may be the most illogical development of this everlasting campaign. In fact, I had to read it several times to make sure I wasn’t confused, dreaming, or inadvertently smoking crack — which, it turns out, I’m not, proving yet again that real life is more bizarre than the movies ever could be.

But more than that, I think Robertson’s newfound love for Rudy suggests: (1) the prior walk-out threats of the Religious Right were overplayed; and (2) the RR may be breathing its last gasps of power.

When a prominent, founding member of the RR “stoops” to endorse a clear pro-choice, pro-gay candidate, it would seem to suggest they’ve now fully sacrificed principles for politics; that they’re now more interested in beating Hillary than advancing their agenda. Granted, the RR has always been highly political, but they’ve generally (love ‘em or not) been true to their narrow-minded, two-plank platform. However, if Robertson’s endorsement does, as I suspect, signal that they’ve now sacrificied their platform simply to beat the D’s, then frankly they have litttle-to-nothing left to stand on and maybe (hopefully, finally) we can wave them “buh-bye.”

On the other hand, Robertson is only one voice in the RR, and his prominence has flagged of late, so perhaps we shouldn’t count the entire movement out for the count just yet. Accordingly, I’ll hold off on buying the keg, party balloons, and kazoos … for at least a little while longer.

Update: Steve Benen — whose politics I generally don’t share but whose intelligence I respect — has a much different take on the Robertson-Rudy development.



This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 7th, 2007 at 8:59 am and is filed under 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Why I’ve Decided to Support Rudy
“I Veto, Therefore I Am” »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.