Congress Disapproval Rise To 75 Percent Increases Democrats’ Dilemma

October 29th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief


Congress’ approval rating is heading so far south that the Democrats in charge may soon smell the magnolias.

The latest CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll shows a 75 percent disapproval rating, guardedly good news for the Democratic Party itself and generally lousy news for the Democrats in charge of — and serving in — Congress:

A year ago, a similar poll found the numbers to be 28 percent approval, 63 percent disapproval.

“The big issues of the day just don’t seem to be being addressed,” said Sarah Binder, a political science professor at George Washington University who studies Congress. “The issues that matter most to people — the economy, health care, the environment and the larger war in Iraq — it is so difficult for Congress to move on those issues that I believe the public looks and says, ‘Why aren’t they doing anything?’”

Republicans will argue it’s because the Democrats are more interested in making political statements than actually working for solutions. Democrats will argue that Republicans — with the White House’s veto backing — have a strategy to nix everything they try to do on the war and other matters so they can run against a “do-nothing Congress” in a copycat campaign patterned after the come-from-behind President Harry Truman.

The Democrats’ problem is that they are already distrusted by some Republicans, hated by another segment of Republicans and are also now exasperating their party’s left wing which expected big changes after 2006. But other Democrats point out the Demmies didn’t win enough in 2006 to override a veto or scuttle GOP attempts to short-circuit their legislative moves.

Does this mean voters are ready to sweep aside the Democrats in 2008 and put Republicans back in? Not necessarily but there are clouds gathering on the political horizon:

Approval of congressional Democrats stands at 43 percent, twice that of Congress in general. The flip side, however, is that Democrats who control Congress still face a disapproval rating of 51 percent, a figure that has increased 11 percentage points since March. Video Watch a report on the new job approval numbers »

“The ratings for Congress overall have been mired in the mid- to low 20s for several months, but for most of the year, Americans have had a positive view of the Democrats in Congress,” said CNN polling director Keating Holland. “That’s not true any longer — this poll is the first time we have found majority disapproval for the Democratic leaders’ track record since they took control of Congress.”

Holland also notes that these numbers will make it increasingly harder for the Democrats to prevail on issues.

So what does it mean? It means anything can happen, says CNN senior political analyst Bill Schneider :

“No one is betting that the Democrats will lose their majorities in the House and Senate,” he said, “but when anti-Washington sentiment is as high as it is now, politics is very unpredictable.”

The results in from a Field Poll taken earlier this month aren’t terrific for the Democrats, either:

The California Field Poll has released another part of it’s current poll taken earlier in October and in many ways the results are an echo of what this venerable poll showed in August.

California registered voters disapprove of Congress by a margin of 64% to 22%–statistically about the same as the 66% to 20% disapproval registered in the August 24, 2007 poll by Field, and within the margin of error of the poll numbers in this release of 4.1%.

Field does not ask voters why they are dissatisfied with Congress as an institution. What is interesting is the partisan divide, and the numbers are quite telling throughout the survey, especially as we see the numbers as to how Democrats, Republicans, and “Non-partisan/others” break down as to the performance of Democrats and Republicans in Congress.

Democrats by a margin of 24% to 58% disapprove of Congress, perhaps a bit lower than in August when the numbers were 27% approval and 55% disapproval. Republicans are more harshly critical of Congress by a margin of 20% to 70%–this is actually a statistically significant improvement since August when it was 14% approval and 79% disapproval. The non-partisan others are disapproving by 22% to 63%, which more approving than in August when they were disapproving 65% to 17%.

Several analysts have pointed to disappointment in the war as the main reason for the low grades from the public: many Democrats themselves are giving the Congress thumbs down. They feel frustrated because, in their view, in terms of war policy, the 2006 elections meant little substantive change.

Can the Democrats regroup? Amid these danger signs (even Majority Leader Harry Reid has a dangerously low approval rating now in his own state and politics IS local) there are reports that Democrats are considering ways of heading in a new direction. Whether that is in terms of policy or tactics, is still not totally clear.

But the Democrats still have several advantages: George Bush remains a hugely unpopular president and there are no signs yet that the Republicans running for the GOP 2008 Presidential nomination seek to woo votes from the center rather than running yet another election where the Republican game plan is to motivate its conservative voters to vote by pushing conservative hot-button issues.

Additionally, many GOPers have announced retirements so the Republicans will have more seats to defend — something not easy in any year, let alone a year when the “brand name” has taken an imagery hit.




This entry was posted on Monday, October 29th, 2007 at 7:39 am and is filed under Democrats, Republicans, Approval Ratings, Iraq, War, 2008 Elections, Congress, Polls, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

The Kirchners-The Clintons »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.