Ron Paul Set To Use Radio And TV Ads In Presidential Campaign Bigtime

October 28th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

If some “mainstream” Republicans in debates and on conservative websites have felt that Rep. Ron Paul is an unwelcome thorn in their side with his views that on many issues don’t skew towards the present GOP establishment, they will be displeased by the following news:

Ron Paul’s campaign is gearing up to be a notable and persistent presence on radio and TV in early primary states by boosting broadcast ads and its fund raising drive. Translate that into: if the ads boost his numbers, it’ll be harder to dismiss him as a voice, harder for him to be as marginalized by editors assigning busy reporters to a daily assignment must-do-list, and it could increase his appeal among young supporters:

Hoping to defy more expectations, Rep. Ron Paul is ratcheting up his maverick Republican presidential campaign by launching TV and radio commercials in early primary states and setting an ambitious $12 million fundraising goal.

For a candidate often relegated by pundits to second- or third-tier status, Paul’s ability to make a big entry into advertising wars is unusual.

This doesn’t necessarily mean he will be skyrocketed into first place, but even if he becomes a solidly strong second-tier candidate in an early primary state he could benefit because the media would then see it as a major story…and he’d get more ink and airtime.

With just over two months until the first primaries, experts question whether the libertarian-leaning congressman from Lake Jackson can expand his intense following to make a credible showing in these early contests.

Officials with Paul’s campaign acknowledge they have an uphill battle, but say they plan to broaden his support with an advertising campaign that includes $1.1 million in television spots that begin airing Monday in New Hampshire.

The Chronicle report quotes campaign spokesman Jesse Benton as saying the campaign wants to give voters a more complete picture of Ron Paul, who has mainly been quoted in the mainstream media for his anti-war statements.

The television spots feature people in New Hampshire talking about Paul’s stands, including bringing troops home from Iraq. The ad also includes biographical material, emphasizing that obstetrician Paul is the only doctor in the race, said Benton.

He might DOWNPLAY that one: it could remind Republican voters of another former doctor who did not endear himself to Republicans…former Majority Leader Senator Bill Frist.

This month the Paul campaign began running about $430,000 worth of radio spots in New Hampshire and early primary states of South Carolina, Iowa and Nevada. Those radio ads stress his domestic stands such as opposition to tax increases and amnesty for illegal immigrants.

To help pay for the stepped-up efforts — of course the campaign hopes to reach beyond past donors who included a self-identified clown and a wizard — the campaign has also set a target of raising $12 million for the last three months of this year.

That comment in this newspaper story is a bit silly. So a clown donated to Paul’s campaign? There are plenty of clowns in politics in both parties. And some of them hold public office. MORE:

That would be more than double the $5.2 million campaign took in during the third quarter of 2007, and about as much as better-known GOP presidential contender Fred Thompson raised last quarter.

The story notes that Paul has run a frugal campaign so far, spending only $2.8 million in the first nine months of the political battle which does not quite match front-runner Rudy Giuliani ($30 million)

The New York Times notes that Paul’s big media push is already underway:

If media muscle is any measure of a candidate, Representative Ron Paul of Texas is getting ready to flex his.

In the last two weeks, Mr. Paul — a Republican presidential candidate — has spent nearly a half-million dollars on radio advertisements in four early primary states, the first major media investment of his campaign. On Tuesday night, he will take a seat opposite Jay Leno.

That is significant: sitting down next to Jay Leno won’t make a campaign but it will continue to solidify his status as someone whose views deserve to be heard. Aside from Leno’s audience, the clip will be shown on news shows and likely circulate like wildfire via you tube.

The Times also notes that those who simply brush Paul aside as irrelevant could be making a huge mistake because he could a) pick up steam b) have an impact on the race:

Dante J. Scala, an associate professor of political science at the University of New Hampshire, said that if the advertisement campaign was effective, it could convince more independents, libertarians and even moderate Republicans to vote for Mr. Paul. According to a recent Marist College poll, about 15 percent of likely Republican voters in the state were undecided.

A poll released Thursday by the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at St. Anselm College in Manchester, put Mr. Paul in fourth place in New Hampshire with 7 percent of the vote, behind Senator John McCain of Arizona (15 percent), Mr. Giuliani (22 percent) and Mitt Romney (32 percent), the former governor of Massachusetts.

“It’s striking to me that he’s at 7 percent without running a single TV ad in New Hampshire,” Mr. Scala said. “If he starts to attract significant support among independents, then he could start to hurt Giuliani or McCain.”

Mr. Paul’s Republican rivals may already be taking notice of his newfound purchasing power. During the Oct. 21 Republican debate in Florida, the other candidates treated him more gently than in previous debates, like the one in May when Mr. Giuliani admonished him for suggesting that the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, were spurred by American policies in the Middle East.

There could be other impacts as well.

Traditionally, if a non-winning presidential primary candidate has views that prove to be popular it begins to impact the race since some other candidates may “steal his thunder” and try to incorporate some of his ideas to attract his voters. A winning candidate who gets the nomination may also move heaven and earth to get that person into the party’s tent for the general election and perhaps acknowledge some of his ideas.

There is always the fear that a supposed “maverick” candidate who is perceived by the establishment of not belonging to the good ‘ol boy network of perceived values and assumptions will pack up and lead a third party movement. Paul has indicated he has no plans to do that…but if the GOP doesn’t address his concerns, his highly-motivated followers are likely to go somewhere else on Election Day. They’re unlikely to stay home. So where would they go?

SOME RELATED READING:

EDITORIAL: No Mystery As To Why Young Americans Love Ron Paul
7
Ron Paul Takes It to the Next Level
Ron Paul: Tear down missiles, Mr. Whatsyaname
Taking Ron Paul Seriously In New Hampshire
Ron Paul: Tough Road in Iowa?
Ron Paul polling 7.4% in New Hampshire, hits Romney on Iran
What a sane Ron Paul supporter sounds like
WHO THE HECK IS RON PAUL?
Medved Takes On Israel’s Foes
Michael Medved Smears Ron Paul
Ron Paul Third Party Scenario
Ron Paul: Forget The Third Party Thing
The Republicans’ Ron Paul Problem
The Ron Paul Factor: What Does The Future Hold For The $5 Million Man?
Ron Paul Odds Slashed Dramatically: 15 to 1 from 200 to 1
Ron Paul: Not The Howard Dean Of ‘08




This entry was posted on Sunday, October 28th, 2007 at 8:14 am and is filed under Ron Paul, Republicans, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.