One Good Thing

October 23rd, 2007
By PETE ABEL, Managing Editor

Print Print

2_61_clinton_mccain.jpg

During Bill Clinton’s Presidency, Rush Limbaugh was a guest on David Letterman’s late-night show. Letterman asked Limbaugh if he could say just one nice thing, one good thing, about the President. Limbaugh couldn’t, or more accurately, wouldn’t — and that was pretty much the end of any interest I had in Limbaugh.

Last month, Letterman presented Clinton with a similar opportunity. Asked what he thought of Sen. McCain, Clinton not only did what any decent person would do, (and what Limbaugh and his ilk have refused to do), the former President went above-and-beyond …

“I like him very much. I admire him. Look he lived — first of all, he served our country with valor and consistency for a long time. He comes from a family of military service. His father had a distinguished career, his grandfather, and he survived five and a half years of hell in that North Vietnamese prison camp … He and Hillary are much closer than I am because they’ve traveled the world with recalcitrant Republican senators trying to convince them that global warming was real … I like him. I admire him. I think he’s a — I don’t agree with him about Iraq, but I think he’s independent and does what he thinks is right and that’s about all you can ask from anybody.”

Sunday evening, presented with an opportunity to attack Hillary, several of the debating GOP candidates jumped at the chance. McCain was far more circumspect.

Striking a gracious note, McCain event went so far as to say, “I know and respect Sen. Clinton,” using her professional title when Giuliani and Romney called her only by her widely-used first name.

While his refusal to tell the Republican activists in attendance what they wanted to hear kept some in the audience sitting on their hands, McCain’s next statement brought them to their feet.

Finding a way to marry a soft Clinton jab with his fiscal conservative credentials and Vietnam war record, McCain pointed out that the New Yorker had sought to include an earmark for a Woodstock museum …

Next, of course, McCain made a remark about Woodstock that earned him the belly-laugh of the night, but in doing so he did not question nor attack the character of Sen. Clinton. Much as the latter’s husband noted how he disagreed with McCain on Iraq, McCain made it clear he disagreed with the Senator from New York on a certain porkish-earmark. However, in both cases, both men couched their disagreement in terms of clear respect.

Regular readers already know I’m fond of both Bill and John. But I raise this two-part example not to gratuitously promote either man. Rather, I raise it to help kick-off an exercise, one that will attempt to learn from and build on their collective example. Specifically, starting today, I’m on the prowl for Progressives/Democrats who will say “one good thing” about their counterparts across the aisle, and Conservatives/Republicans who will do the same. These examples of “one good thing” need not come from Washington. To the contrary, they can come from anywhere — including (and in particular) from you.

Like me, other readers of and writers for this site frequently bemoan the nastiness of political discourse in these United States, not the least of which we see in the blogosphere’s mad-dash mudslinging. Here’s a chance to do something about it, to do something more than “bemoan,” to directly contribute to a more civilized refrain.

Net: If you lean progressive and catch a conservative in the act of doing “one good thing,” or if you lean conservative and spot a similar act by a progressive … drop me a line. I’ll then source the information, compile it with other found or submitted evidence, and share the results. And who knows? Maybe, just maybe, others (outside this space) will follow suit.




This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007 at 11:44 am and is filed under Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.