Bush Makes Surprise Visit To Iraq To “See For Himself” Situation

September 3rd, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

It’s holiday time and you truly could have predicted this one:

President Bush made a surprise visit to Iraq Monday, shortly before a White House deadline to report to Congress on the U.S. troop increase there.

After exiting the aircraft, a line of military officials, including top war commander Gen. David Petraeus, welcomed Bush with smiles, salutes and handshakes in the 115- degree heat.

Bush plans to eat dinner with U.S. troops and to meet with top military commanders, the U.S. ambassador, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and provincial tribal leaders. …

Bush has hailed Anbar as a success, citing the U.S. military’s alliance with tribal leaders in fighting al Qaeda in Iraq.

The White House denied the trip was a publicity visit ahead of a report about U.S. troop increases in Iraq to be delivered by Petraeus next week in Washington.

It’s just that the timing is coincidental. The TIME story has a phrase that raises an eyebrow:

Aides billed the six-hour stop as a fact-finding mission for the President, saying Bush wanted to see for himself what was happening in Iraq, since it will be his responsibility to make the final call about troop levels. “This gives the president an opportunity first hand to hear from people directly involved and make his own assessments at the same time,” said National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley on board Air Force One Sunday night.

The TIME story also suggests the trip happening on the day it’s happening on is not happenstance:

The surprise trip was planned over a six week period by a small group at the White House, convened by chief of staff Josh Bolten and including Hadley, vice president Dick Cheney and a handful of other top aides. Hadley said that when the President was approached about the idea of a trip to Anbar province he leapt at it.

Unless Mr. Bush spent more than a day there, it’s unlikely he would be able to “see for himself’ what is going on. The White House routinely gets tons of detailed reports from the field. To genuinely “see for himself” what the situation is in military, political and security terms, he’d have to stay a bit longer.

This is one of these events that many Presidents do in wartime — visi the troops. It’s a gesture of good-will and for many Presidents is a good, solid photo-op. It could help the administration because the fact it was a “surprise” visit immediately heightens its ranking as a dramatic must-do story for news editors (who always are looking ways to use stories during a slow holiday period).

But in the end, it’s unlikely the visit will change many minds among the America public, or Bush’s — no matter what is said during his trip or upon his return.

He’ll have a limited amount of time to talk to a limited number of people. Will those with dissenting views about how things are going in Iraq — representatives of various Iraqi groups that don’t agree with the government — meet with him as well? He’ll largely get the official view, connect with some Iraqi bigwigs and perhaps read some Iraq government officials the riot act.

Meanwhile, over the years Americans have seen enough news stories about surprise Presidential visits to troops, or just visits to troops, so it’s unlikely to change many minds.

Those opposed to the war will dismiss it as a publicity stunt. Those who support it will say it’s a plus for Bush and will bolster policy or underscore how well the surge is going. And those in the part of the American public that polls show are souring on the war but balk at calls for an immediate or timetable pullout yet want to wind things down soon and distrust the administration’s rhetoric or photo ops are unlikely to change their evolving views by Bush coming back after a day or so and calling the surge a growing success. Other info could change minds one way or another.

The visit will boost troop morale. Otherwise, the story will provide an “AHA! See how it’s working” for those who already support the administration but are unlikely to change the growing cumulative public perception of the war, it’s long-term wiseness, its early management and how it is being conducted.




This entry was posted on Monday, September 3rd, 2007 at 9:31 am and is filed under Gen. Petraeus, Bush Administration, Surge, Iraq, Military, War, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.