The Implosion Of Senator John McCain (UPDATED)

July 13th, 2007 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

1_mccain_bush_hug.jpg

No, the picture above isn’t evidence of the latest GOP scandal.

One day, this campaign 2004 photo will be considered the photo that helped sink a candidacy. Not since singer Sammy Davis, Jr. hugged a seemingly embarrassed President Richard Nixon has a photo be run and re-run so much by so many, usually with derisive motives in mind. It wouldn’t have had impact if McCain’s once stellar image hadn’t taken a nosedive among many voters for varying reasons.

And now, with news that he’s laying off staff and his campaign funds are lagging, the political obituaries are starting to appear for the McCain campaign.

How did it happen?
How did John McCain EVER fall so sharply off the tightrope that had made him a national favorite until the past few months?

Prose Not Hos has a MUST READ analysis of the McCain campaign.

Its opening:

After burning through all but 2 million of 22 million dollars raised and the culmination of a failed campaign with the public guillotining of the longtime senior campaign managers and fifty staffers, the political obituary has been written for the once-heralded media darling. In the past week, the media has attempted to retrace the dance steps it took in 2000 with the upstart Senator branded as the brazenly honest maverick. From Salon to the Washington Post, the question posed is what caused the derailment of the famed Straight Talk Express and the once certain McCain presidential bid?

Its last paragraph:

For many, the past eight years have been a disheartening display of McCain’s willingness to sacrifice his credentials in order to please the Republican elite. The edge that McCain once brought – a willingness to take on corporate corruption, lobbyist influence, and the charlatans of the Evangelical movement — has been dulled by a complacency in being a Bush sycophant, willing to suck down the fumes from a disastrous war, an exceedingly unpopular immigration policy, and economically hobbling tax cuts while Bush speeds away from Pennsylvania Avenue. In essence, the media darling turned into another Bush crony, willing to stoop to new and unnecessary lows in a vain attempt to jockey to be the next Commander in Chief. The McCain implosion is one of his own doing, the consequence of doing business in Washington and misreading the Bush orthodoxy as the key to the White House.

Now read all the sections in the middle.

UPDATE: Thomas Edsall, writing in The Huffington Post, reports that strategists in both parties say McCain’s only choice now is to turn his back on Bush and become the anti-establishment candidate:
According to private conversations with political operatives from both parties, John McCain has no choice but to adopt a high risk strategy to revive his presidential bid, a double Hail Mary: Throw one stink bomb at the White House and another at Republican National Committee headquarters.

There is no guarantee the strategy would work - in fact the odds are long against it.

McCain tried to become the establishment candidate and failed. Fred Thompson is now seeking to fill that vacuum, although the value of that position appears to have dropped sharply. “The collapse of the McCain campaign is simply a metaphor for the disintegration of the entire Republican Party establishment,” conservative public relations strategist Craig Shirley noted.

Rudy Giuliani has become the post-9/11 national security candidate. Mitt Romney, in turn, appears to have locked up Iowa, where a victory will turn him into a competitor elsewhere.

The only place left for McCain is to be the anti-Bush Republican. This was his turf in 2000, and it is far more fertile ground today.
There’s more in the article. But if McCain followed this advice, he’d be like a person who committed political suicide committing suicide again. And it’s likely to happen.

McCain’s problem is not only his positions.

Opposition to him on the war and other policies are also coupled with the fact that he was trusted or reviled in 2000 due to what many felt were his strong beliefs that didn’t quite fit into one party. People who liked him considered him not just another party (Republican or Democratic) hack. People who hated him, considered him a loose cannon who could not be relied on to achieve party goals.

In 2007, he faces a problem that many on both sides don’t think he is a “straight talker” at all but someone who scuttles or hedges on past positions — but not with the skill of a Mitt Romney (who has had more political positions in 2006 than Al Gore had wardrobes in 2000). He is now widely distrusted.

If he pursued this sudden political makeover strategy, McCain could certainly say the words but he’d be further distrusted by GOPers, would never win over many of the independents and even Democrats who once liked him but have now written him totally off as just another Republican pandering to his party’s base, and be repeatedly asked by the press about the timing of this sharp transformation.

He’d be as likely to get the Republican nomination as Michael Moore.

This entry was posted on Friday, July 13th, 2007 at 12:44 am and is filed under John McCain, Republicans, 2008 Elections, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Through the Looking Glass With GWB »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.