Giuliani’s “New” Theme To Shore Up Support: 911

December 30th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

150px_Laurel.jpg

Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani largely-skipped Iowa and was out of the media loop, got some bad publicity and has seen his poll numbers sag. So his strategists decided to roll out a NEW theme: 911.

Haven’t we heard that song before?

But the Mayor & Co. (partially influenced by the turbulence and uncertainty in nuke-power Pakistan) are returning to pushing The Basic Brand:

Mr. Giuliani’s retooled stump speech compares the Sept. 11 generation to the generation that won World War II. He is running a new television advertisement that shows firefighters atop the smoldering ruins of the World Trade Center site. And this week, Mr. Giuliani, who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination, seized on the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and the suicide bombing in Pakistan to warn audiences that it “reminds us of the kind of world that we live in.”

“For me this is a particularly personal experience,” Mr. Giuliani said in Florida as he discussed the assassination of Ms. Bhutto on Thursday, “because I lived through Sept. 11, 2001, and then I lived through the attacks in London a few years later.”

Mr. Giuliani’s decision to return to the issues of Sept. 11 and terrorism before the Iowa caucuses on Jan. 3 comes after months in which his campaign sometimes seemed to struggle to try to find a way to talk about the attacks without seeming exploitative, while broadening his message to fight the impression that he is a single-issue candidate.


Exploitive exshmoitive…This is politics. You do whatever works..

If Hillary can run around with Bill and double-team other candidates, then Rudy can try to use verbal visualization to get voters to remember how truly courageous he looked during the immediate aftermath period when President George Bush was either uninspiring or totally missing in action as he flew around the country.

Sensitive to criticisms like one Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., Democrat of Delaware, leveled — that for Mr. Giuliani a sentence was “a noun and a verb and 9/11” — the campaign worked to show other dimensions. Over the summer and fall he made policy proposals, talked about his record as mayor of New York City, and reached further into his biography to highlight his career in the Justice Department in the 1970s and 1980s. For months, he was more likely to talk about supply-siders than suicide bombers.

Now, though, as Mr. Giuliani’s standing in the polls has slipped and he risks being sidelined by his decision not to compete fully in the Iowa caucuses, his campaign is returning to his signature issue. The shift began this month when he retooled his stump speech in Florida, with more references to Sept. 11 than usual. A campaign video shown on the Internet and at rallies includes an image of two terrorists in head scarves with guns. And he is running a minute-long advertisement focusing on Sept. 11.

“It is part of my life,” Mr. Giuliani said this week about the advertisement. “It is part of my life that helps to define me. It isn’t the only part of my life. But it would seem to me that maybe the critics want you to, like, remove a part of your life in which people have every right to draw judgments about how you would handle a crisis, how you would handle a difficult situation, how you would handle terrorism.”

But, as the New York Times notes, it’s possible Mr. Giuliani’s moment has passed.

Some polls suggest that Mr. Giuliani may not have a decisive advantage on the issue of terrorism. In a New York Times/CBS News poll in September, Mr. Giuliani’s supporters were asked if they thought he would do a better job fighting terrorism compared with the other candidates running for the Republican nomination. A quarter of them said they thought Mr. Giuliani would do a better job than his opponents, but the large majority — 61 percent — said they would expect Mr. Giuliani to be about the same as the other candidates when it came to fighting terrorism.

But the Giuliani campaign is clearly hoping that news coverage of the chaos in Pakistan will refocus attention on the threat of terrorism, which it thinks is a strong issue for Mr. Giuliani but which has receded in recent polls of voters’ top concerns.

Perhaps.

But Giuliani’s big problem is going to be that he has referred to 911 so often that the “slogan” has lost its force with many voters and has become a topic of derision not just with Biden but with many commentators (in both parties) and late-night comedians (just wait until they get back on the air in January…). He is danger of being the Johnny-One-Note Candidate.

The Pakistan crisis — which is likely to grow on several fronts in coming months — could make voters prefer candidates with greater foreign affairs experience, or those who talk a tough game on terrorism.

Even so, Giuliani’s big push to brand himself Mr. Toughie on terrorism has lost some of its OOMMPH due to its being used way too often — and the fact that he’s now being followed by critics who allege his pre-911 performance is being challenged by a group of firefighters’ relatives who say his decisions contributed to some firefighters’ deaths.

Stories about critics of his pre-911 performance will likely blossom as time goes on, because these critics most assuredly will eventually run TV ads…which will then spark TV stories and print stories that will give the paid advertising some free advertising.

The biggest problem for Giuliani is that GOP voters have looked at him and are still shopping. Although he’d be formidable in an election, he has to get through the primaries first.

His 911 leadership and image of courage opened the door for a sale — and now he has to close it.

Any salesperson knows: to make a sale you have to overcome all objections.

Using the same theme that has been used for more than a year most likely won’t do it — even if unforeseen events make the country look around for a strong leader.




This entry was posted on Sunday, December 30th, 2007 at 6:45 pm and is filed under Pakistan, Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Iowa, Terrorism, 9/11, 2008 Elections, Polls, Republicans, Rudy Giuliani, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.