« Business Week: Consumer Credit Arbitration — you lose!
Can Yet Another Old White Guy Win? »



News From the Israeli and Palestinian Front: June 8th

June 8th, 2008
By JEB KOOGLER

Print Print

A biweekly feature of news and opinion pieces from the Israeli and Palestinian press.

1.) A day after clinching the Democratic nomination, Senator Barack Obama spoke at the annual AIPAC conference (an organization that the Jerusalem Post, in a recent editorial, oddly characterized as “quintessentially American.”) Perhaps hoping to allay fears of not being sufficiently pro-Israeli, Obama promised strong support for Israel in the coming decade — to the tune of $30 billion dollars. He also spoke tough about Iran and, most surprisingly, declared his endorsement of an undivided Jerusalem.

It is not clear what Obama meant by this last statement, since no viable Palestinian-Israeli peace proposal has ever included full Israeli control over Jerusalem. In response to the comment, the Arab press has reacted furiously, and Hamas has effectively “un-endorsed” Obama. Seeking to address the controversy, a campaign spokesman clarified that Obama merely meant that Jerusalem should not be physically divided by barbed wire. The Senator, the spokesman added, supports whatever outcome for the holy city that is decided upon by the negotiating parties.

2.) Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is making an effort to initiate a “national dialogue” with Hamas. His hope, according to reports, is to reunify the Palestinian leadership. Some analysts have suggested that this move towards reconciliation is, in part, aimed at putting pressure on the Israelis to grant greater concessions in the peace process. “Abbas is telling the Israelis…, ‘You either give me everything I want or I will go to Hamas.’ He’s hoping to put pressure on them by seeking rapprochement with Hamas,” said an unnamed analyst quoted by the Jerusalem Post.

3.) Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz said recently that an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities is “unavoidable,” given the lack of success of the UN-imposed economic sanctions.

“If Iran continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective,” Mofaz told the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper.

4.) The Israeli government has plans to build over 700 new housing units in the East Jerusalem neighborhood of Pisgat Ze’ev. A frustrated Daniel Levy, writing at his blog, argues that nothing good can come of this:

I am convinced that if a two state solution is ever reached, then Pisgat Ze’ev will be part of Israel in its agreed, recognized, and legitimized new borders, and I have been part of Israeli negotiating teams—official and unofficial—that have argued this case. But until that agreement is reached, every housing unit added and marketed beyond the Green Line will continue to undermine that same two state solution and reduce the likelihood of it ever being reached as the belief on both sides in such an option is further eroded. The US government and international community criticized this act of settlement expansion, but it goes on and on.



This entry was posted on Sunday, June 8th, 2008 at 9:36 pm and is filed under Palestine, Israel. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    Israeli/Palestinian politics seem to be in bigger turmoil with every day. Palestinians are divided among themselves and Israelis are divided.
    No sooner had the deputy PM referred to the inevitability of attacking Iran, than others claimed it was just a maneuver to unseat the weakened Olmert.

    Obama blundered by bringing up the toughest nut to crack: Jerusalem, especially in front of AIPAC (and inevitably, the world). As it was clarified by his adviser, a Hassidic Jew, his position seems good. It is not an appropriate role for the US to impose a solution,; it's up to the people of the region to find one.

    AIPAC, like all disproportionaly) funded lobbies presents a problem, because it invites our meddling in Israel's internal political affairs. if we could manage some serious lobby reforms, it might help here, too.

    We've meddled before and lived to regret it, but never seem to stop.
    I still remember the scandal when liberal donations to Irish Catholic causes, involving prominent Americans) ended up in the pockets of the militants of the IRA.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Business Week: Consumer Credit Arbitration — you lose!
Can Yet Another Old White Guy Win? »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.