« A Bush Do-Over Wish? Or Just Part of Legacy Building?
Bailout Bungling Likely To Continue »



Obama and Mecca

December 4th, 2008
By TONY CAMPBELL, TMV Columnist

Print Print

I wrote the post below several months ago (July) and now it seems that it may be relevant again because of a piece today in The New York Times. If Obama really wants to give a major foreign policy speech in the first 100 days, the best location to do so in my opinion is Mecca.

It is not the political divide that is the source of anxiety between the west and the Middle East, it is the cultural and theological differences of western secularized Christianity and Islam. Obama has the ability to reach across that divide and bring us closer together in understanding each other.

Below is an excerpt the July 21st, 2008 post with my December 2008 comments in bold:

My issue with Obama’s trip is the visit to Berlin. First, the advance team made a monumental mistake of trying to drop their candidate into a situation that reminded Americans of two of the greatest presidents of the 20th century, John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan. Of course, the difference is that they were the President and their speeches were directed at the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Who exactly is Obama trying to address with a speech in Berlin? The scrutiny he will receive over this speech will make or break this foreign trip; nothing else will matter, so he better nail it. (OK, he nailed it pretty good…moving on)

My suggestion to Obama: forget Berlin, go to Mecca. If you really want to be seen in a Kennedy / Reagan light in the diplomatic arena, you should use your popularity and your unique heritage to address the Christian and Muslim worlds. A thoughtful speech that focuses on our similarities, rather than our differences, is clearly needed between both communities of faith. Kennedy and Reagan in their speeches addressed the major foreign policy concerns of our country. Obama has the opportunity to do something similar if he takes up this challenge. However, the issue is much trickier and more dangerous than either Kennedy or Reagan had to face. Instead of disarming conventional and nuclear weapons, Obama has to disarm fear and prejudice on both sides, Christian and Muslim.

This is where the “Audacity of Hope” meets the reality of fear…let’s see if hope can transform the world once again. (Now, that would be a speech worth watching…)



This entry was posted on Thursday, December 4th, 2008 at 2:56 pm and is filed under Mideast, Foreign Policy, The New York Times, At TMV, Columnists, Islam, Saudi Arabia, Barack Obama. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 4 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Under Saudi law, non-Muslims are forbidden from entering Mecca, and according to Wikipedia that Saudi law is based on a passage from the Qur'an. Even if Saudi officials waived the law for special circumstances, speaking from Mecca would re-stoke the "Obama is a secret Muslim!" issues and/or anger Muslim groups that see it as a violation of scripture.
    • ^
    • v
    You beat me to it Tube.
    • ^
    • v
    "A thoughtful speech that focuses on our similarities, rather than our differences, is clearly needed between both communities of faith."

    Tony it is my humble opinion that these two "communities of faith" are at odds in many fundamental, elemental ways, and any attempt at recognizing similarities begins within a secular framework. Leave religious reconciliation efforts between faiths to the faith leaders--our "similarities" are admittedly more important, but (I don't think) begin in the areas of superstition and dogma. And besides, world history hasn't been too promising considering successful reconciliation of religious differences. If Ghandi couldn't do it, I doubt Barack Obama could.

    And let's move on from United Nations resolutions that protect the "faithful" from criticisms, and disregard those messages from the Pope and others in our Religious Right sphere regarding the inappropriateness of skepticism and criticism of a "faith community" or an individual's "faithful beliefs." If it's in the public square, if it is used as incentive to harm or divide or to generate policy, meet it head-on with a purely secular challenge. Make no mistake about this: there is a radical religious element intent on a worldwide caliphate, that won't be influenced by the seductive talk of an American politician. And in our own neck of the woods, there's plenty of activity under the wider radar working to further Christianize this nation.

    And I agree with Tube and Davebo--can you imagine Fox News on Barack HUSSEIN Obama's talk from Mecca? Sarah Palin would have a field day there, maybe her most articulate future interview.
    • ^
    • v
    "It is not the political divide that is the source of anxiety between the west and the Middle East, it is the cultural and theological differences of western secularized Christianity and Islam."

    Hehe, some sweet irony to that statement and your idea as the muslims go berserk over the idea of letting an infidel into their holy city. And considering how hard he worked to convince less informed Americans how not muslim he is, it would be a shame to undo all that work.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« A Bush Do-Over Wish? Or Just Part of Legacy Building?
Bailout Bungling Likely To Continue »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.