Guest Book Review: The Rape of Nanking by Iris Chang

November 19th, 2007 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

This is another Guest Book Review by fiction writer Jessica Schneider who also writes for the highly visited site Cosmoetica, is Book Editor for Monsters and Critics and is the only contributor to her own blog.

Book review: The Rape of Nanking by Iris Chang

by Jessica Schneider

The Rape of Nanking is a well-written account of what happened in Nanking in 1937 when the Japanese invaded and slaughtered 300,000 Chinese. Known for being “The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II,” this book goes into the detail not only of the Rape itself and what it entailed but also addresses the ways the Japanese tried to deny it ever happened and likewise cover it up.

Iris Chang published her book in 1997 and I only came to learn of her suicide in 2004. Many speculate her sudden suicide was due to not only her personal depression but also because of the impact that this grisly subject matter must have had on her.

For many years The Rape of Nanking was never spoken about—largely because many of the surviving Chinese were humiliated by the whole experience, as well as the efforts put upon by the Japanese government, as well as educational systems, to cover it up. I recommend this book highly, but keep in mind this is not for the ‘weak heart.’ Within the book you will find photos of Chinese people being tortured, decapitated, a woman with a sharp object protruding from her vagina, all the while noticing the smiles upon those Japanese faces committing the crimes.

The word ‘Rape’ is used effectively here, for not only were these horrid acts a rape of these people’s basic human rights, but also because women were the ones who suffered the most. The book addresses the many rapes that took place by the Japanese soldiers to that of civilian women—where more often than not the women were not only raped, but were disemboweled, had their vaginas torn apart by knives, their breasts cut off, or were tied up and sometimes forced to endure sex with as many as 40 soldiers a night.

In one of the photos it is highly disturbing to see a young woman tied up with her legs spread apart and wallowing in exhaustion. It is possible that the woman in the photo might not even be alive.

Many of these Japanese solders were so used to killing that the mere act of slaughter became boring to them, and so that is why they made up ‘games’ for how to kill people. I won’t list them all here, but I had to put the book down a moment and gather myself because it was so hard to imagine. The book also gets you wondering which is crueler—to shoot 50 people in the head quickly, or to take half that number and mutilate them for weeks on end?

Ironically, one of the heroes of Nanking is John Rabe, who was also a Nazi. Rabe served as the Chairman for the International Committee and helped to organize the Nanking Safety Zone, as well as having kept lengthy diaries to serve as evidence for future years. Chang calls Rabe the “Oskar Schindler of China.” She also speaks about the handful of other Westerners, like Rabe, who stayed behind to help the Chinese people, and how their acts of heroism have gone largely ignored in history, just as the Rape of Nanking itself.

It was also interesting to learn the ways in which the Japanese tried to cover it up.

For years afterwards many of the Chinese resorted to smoking opium and heroin for no other reason than just to escape the misery of their lives. Likewise, crime levels began to rise and so many of the Japanese deniers began claiming that Nanking had been in need for Japanese occupation due to the high crimes—for some government to give them order. She also addresses the ways in which the Japanese history books have been edited and rewritten, where the Rape of Nanking is presented not as a systematic slaughter to kill the Chinese people, but as the mere result of war.

I found many similarities between those who deny the Rape of Nanking with those who deny the Holocaust and the Armenian Genocide, as well as ways in which government works to hide the evidence. Deniers quibble with the numbers murdered (saying it is much less), claiming the murders were not systematic but as a result of war, and also claiming the victims had ‘rebelled’ as a means to justify the invasion and murder. Chang details these denial tactics at great length.

She also calls the act of forgetting this atrocity “The Second Rape.” How has this event has gone largely ignored by culture? This fact is what prompted Chang to write this book.

It is easy to compare these acts done by the Japanese soldiers to those done by the Nazis, but largely the difference resides in the fact that the Nazis filmed much of their crimes and thereby left large amounts of footage behind.

The Japanese worked very hard at covering it up, (just as the Turkish government did with the Armenian Genocide) as well as many of the survivors who refused to speak about it—out of fear and shame—many of them women having survived the rapes. Chang notes that because chastity was so valued, the attitude among some of the Chinese was that those women who’d survived the rapes shouldn’t bother trying to live normal lives but should instead just commit suicide.

This book is a great source of information about the Nanking atrocity, as well providing an analysis of the militarism that went into the minds of the Japanese soldiers, prompting them to have such a callous disrespect towards the life and mind of the individual.

After reading this book, one will be able to note the patterns that have become all too familiar in our history: the wanton disregard for human life, those who die, and those who live on—many who never even get an apology. Read this book.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 19th, 2007 at 12:35 am and is filed under Japan, Guest Contributor, China, Books. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

7 responses about “Guest Book Review: The Rape of Nanking by Iris Chang”

  1. Robert Bell said:

    A very sad footnote is that Chang herself did not survive(source) - she committed suicide in November of 2004 after a period of profound depression and exhaustion.

  2. domajot said:

    Just reading the book can bring on profound depression. Researching it and writing it must have been toruure of its own kind for the author. That the attention the book earned was so sparse must have added to the dismay, as it did to mine.

    It is revoltingly true, that mankind insists on acknowledging, only the popularized outrages against humanity and ignores all else. It is also revolting to see how successful the coveri-ups and denials can be.

    Particulary disgusting is the tactic of smearing the characters of the vicitms, as if that had anything to do with the crime. Even promiscuours women deserve to be protected against rape, and a people should not be required to be saints in order to denounce their attackers. That whole line of reasoning is, or should be dismissed as, irrelevant..

    A very disturbing book, and one that deserves more attention, much more.

  3. DLS said:

    When I lived in Phoenix I took a motorcycle ride out to LA where I had lived several years before, and rode north to the Santa Ynez Valley and beyond, my favorite day trip when I had lived in LA. On the way north I stopped at a Borders bookstore at or near Thousand Oaks, where Chang was giving a public presentation about her book to a large, appreciative audience. (Many of these people were older PBS-watching-type liberals, who would ask her questions about how “this! OUTRAGE!” could be allowed to happen, etc. I almost burst out laughing.)

  4. Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estés said:

    Dear Jessica Schneider, thank you for writing about Iris’s work. She was a friend in the book world.

    She was working on another book about the march
    from Bataan at the time of her death, and carried in
    so many unrelieved ways, the sorrow of the Ages. She was a ’sensitive,’ –a strong soul in a delicate carapace.

    Iris left a little son, two years old at the time. Many of us are still sad to have lost so much by losing her.

    dr.e

  5. Jessica Schneider said:

    I did read that about her, in regards to her ideas on the book and her son being left behind. And I know about that book that one of her friends wrote about her as well–”Finding Iris Chang” although it got mixed reviews, from what I’ve seen. Reviewers seem to think the author focuses too much on herself and not enough on Chang, or something like that.

  6. DLS said:

    The Japanese worked very hard at covering it up

    At the Strand bookstore in New York I saw a book (which I didn’t bother to buy; for all I know it is still on the shelf there) by a Japanese author denying any massacre occurred, that it was just an ordinary battle with some civilian casualties, that was all.

  7. Jessica Schneider said:

    DLS:

    I’m not at all surprised to hear that.

Campaign 2008: The Media Pushes the Stone Up the Hill One More Time »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.