Burma Dharma: What is the Sound of 20,000 Monks Marching?

September 26th, 2007 by DR. CLARISSA PINKOLA ESTÉS, TMV Columnist

burmamonks_wideweb__470×3420.jpg

Can you imagine 20,000 Rabbi’s taking to the streets of Manhattan to protest the treatment of the poor? How about 20,000 Bishops and Cardinals marching in the streets of say, Venice, holding hands? Could you imagine 20,000 Imams marching in Baghdad protesting the deaths of innocents? It would be awe-striking. Such a searing statement.

But we don’t need to imagine holy men marching in Burma. This week, 20,000 monks gathered at the Shwe-dagon Pagoda, one of the holiest religious sites in Burma, and a historical rallying point for protests, both political and compassionate. From there, the 20,000 monks took to the streets… to protest the junta government’s cavalier cruelty to the poor… which includes huge fuel price hikes, as well as widespread imprisoning of persons who speak out against the government.

The Burmese monks, thin creatures most of them, many elderly, in maroon robes, one arm bare… walking with purpose, no doubt in some kind of anti-vajra hell meditation…. and following them, many young men in long black wraps, holding hands; their faces deadly serious and poignantly soft-eyed at the same time.

And that is just what the post-British occupation Burmese government wants to eradicate: peaceful determined people with clear minds and compassionate hearts… the most dangerous kind of people on earth… to a dictator; to a corrupt government, to anything or anyone inhumane.

Burma’s governance is more and more influenced by China, as China has pegged Burma to be a supplier of oil and other natural resources for the Chinese people. One wonders if the recent fuel price hike in Burma is tied to China somehow.

It is also being said by sources in Burma, none of whom want to be quoted by name, that thus far the Buddhist monks and those who’ve joined their protest are not being slapped down, arrested and murdered as they were in a similar rising up in 1988… mainly because China does not want civil unrest. It wants to continue to build its roads in Burma to bring out its oil and timber.

However, Burma wants no ‘awe-striking or searing’ revelations about its long term and ongoing injustices toward its own people. Though the Buddhists are pleading for the United Nations to become involved immediately, the Burmese government is reportedly closing down websites and internet access as quickly as it can… sparked by cell-phone films Burmese have taken of violence toward the marchers … showing up on YouTube… thereby ‘letting the world know.’

Like Comandante Marcos from Chiapas who broke the gatekeepers of Mexico, bypassing the Mexican media and governmental agencies by going to the internet to tell about the political quashing of natives in that area, and thereby garnering huge waves of support for their travail… the Burmese are also reaching past their government’s usual mouthpieces via ‘new media’ to speak their truths… For instance, this article came about via an internet communiqué alerting me to the situation in Burma… sent from a missionary with a laptop in Rangon.

However, as of this evening the signs in parts of Burma are ominous as tanks and armed soldiers have taken up positions on the streets. The military is beginning to arrest civilians, has called a curfew and also rescinded ‘right of assembly’ limiting meetings to no more than five persons.

Though some accuse the monks of being pawns of extremist groups, and some others accuse the monks of being hypocritical because some of their leaders sometimes ceremonially ’sit in golden chairs’ (each temple often has chairs given by the populace that are anywhere from simple to fancy) it is unlikely that such accusation hold much sway. More sturdy is that this could be China’s chance, despite multiple motives, to show how humane they can be by staying the Burmese government’s violent reactions to the protesters. It could be a chance for the United States to stand up for a people who dearly seem to want a rock-solid democracy instead of a mock democracy…as their government keeps averring they have a stepped plan for a democracy… some day. It would be a chance for the Burmese government to take down its armored bunker mentality and become a governing body instead of an exploitative one.

Meanwhile, 20,000 Buddhist monks with no armor other than their profound belief in compassionate action toward all beings, march in Burma tonight, their faces so deadly serious and their eyes so soft, all at the same time.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 26th, 2007 at 1:25 am and is filed under Oil, Freedom of the Press, Internet, Human Rights, Burma, Bush Administration, Psychology, Civil Liberties, Religion, Endangered Species, Energy, Internet News Media, Social Commentary, Freedom of Speech, China. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

UAW & GM Reportedly Reach Tentative Settlement »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.