How America Chooses its Leaders: What Brazilians Need to Know

July 3rd, 2008
By WILLIAM KERN


As anyone who regularly visits the Moderate Voice or WORLDMEETS.US knows by now, the world’s attention is riveted on the U.S. election campaign. And in every nation, different lessons - some of them cautionary - are being drawn.

Writing for Brazil’s Estadao, Lourdes Sola explains why American election campaigns - particularly this one - create so much emotion in the ‘other three corners of the world’ and how the way Americans choose their leaders proves the resiliency and health of U.S. democracy. Sola then outlines the lessons that people in other nations, particularly Brazilians, should glean from the U.S. presidential race.

Examining how the candidates, Obama and McCain, were selected, Sola writes:

“American democracy shows the enormous capacity of institutions to absorb and filter change in society without resulting challenges to the law. The dispute in the Democratic Party between ‘a woman’ and ‘a Black,’ leads to an institutional question: Why and by what mechanisms were Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama chosen as the most competitive electoral candidates? The same question can be posed about the nomination of John McCain since it also reflects a shift in the value system of the Republican Party on immigration, the environment and secularism. Taken together, this is a “change in season” in the sphere of politics and reflects a profound transformation in that society’s system of values and criteria for political legitimacy.”

Outlining a lesson for other nations in all of this given our fast-changing world, Sola writes:

“Societies today are exposed to global processes of political interaction and a dissemination of values over which nations and party leaders have little control. Apart from changes in the axis of global power and the role of the major emerging countries, it is the force and vitality of American democratic institutions - and not its economy - that the election campaign brings to the fore of the international debate. Confronting the successive “shocks of reality” to which U.S. society has been subject - from the losses associated with the war in Iraq to the subprime crisis - the process of regenerating American social life has begun in the political realm rather than through any particular policies. This will now play out in the contest between Obama vs. McCain.”

By Lourdes Sola*

Translated By Brandi Miller

July 2, 2008

Brazil - Estadao - Original Article (Portuguese)

The electoral campaign in the United States raises a question that warrants several answers, all of them valid. Why do American elections stir up so much emotion with people here and in the other three corners of the world?

Two unprecedented changes draw the attention of the observer. First of all, the interest is global, entails strong emotion and is generally viewed positively. Therefore, the many forms of anti-Americanism that the Iraq War has exacerbated have been turned inside out. On the other hand, similarities among the various forms of “anti-Americanism” in different regions and nations show the unprecedented nature of the campaign. Reactions vary not only depending on the ideology and interests of those doing the talking, but also from where they are from. If one examines reactions to the campaign systematically rather than from a single angle, one is better able to understand the prevailing reaction [to the U.S. election], “on this inconsequential side of the world,” as [Argentine writer] Jorge Luis Borges would put it . In this regard, two questions arise. What does this electoral cycle reveal about the quality of American representative democracy? And what reflections does it inspire about the quality of our own?

American democracy shows the enormous capacity of institutions to absorb and filter change in society without resulting challenges to the law. The dispute in the Democratic Party between “a woman” and “a Black,” leads to an institutional question: Why and by what mechanisms were Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama chosen as the most competitive electoral candidates? The same question can be posed about the nomination of John McCain since it also reflects a shift in the value system of the Republican Party on immigration, the environment and secularism. Taken together, this is a “change in season” in the sphere of politics and reflects a profound transformation in that society’s system of values and criteria for political legitimacy. The international impact of this will be significant because the United States is still a dominant player and because we live in the information age.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the U.S. election.




This entry was posted on Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 at 2:57 pm and is filed under You Tube, Foreign Policy, Black/African-American, Bush Administration, Political Philosophy, Anti-Americanism, Democracy, Cartoons, Newspapers, Republican Party, Surrogates, Leadership, Iraq War, Primaries, Newsweek Blogitics, Voting, Pro-Democracy Movements, Foreign Politics, Elections, Economy, Political Cartoons, War, Congress, 2008 Elections, History, Money/Finance, Politics, Iraq, Latin America (Central/South), Barack Obama, John McCain, Social Commentary, Cartoon Commentary, Hillary Clinton, Minorities, Democrats, Business. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

Obama starts to “un-nuance” Iraq (Updated) »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.