Experts, Crooks and the American Media

April 24th, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN


The repercussions of a recent New York Times article about how the Pentagon manipulated the American media have begun to be felt in the foreign press.

Serge Truffaut writes for Montreal’s Le Devoir,

“The old adage that “the first casualty of war is truth” is one to which the Pentagon has stuck to with unheard of will, strength, and consistency. Thanks to the Benedictine work a journalist from The New York Times - and there is no better word to describe it- we now know that the U.S. executive has applied itself to building a propaganda machine so powerful, that it highlights the disdain that Bush and company feed on with respect to democracy.”

And who is to blame, according to Truffaut?:

“Every aspect, element and factor of this story depends on a … state of mind! … That of Rumsfeld and Cheney. It has been repeated often enough that these veterans of the Nixon and Ford Administrations have never digested the obligation they were given when Ford was in the White House: to manage the diminishment of Executive power that resulted from Watergate and the Vietnam War. When they returned, their inclination for an Imperial America had combined with a relish for revenge and the recovery of lost mandates of the 1970s. And with the great damage we now know.”

By Serge Truffaut

Translated By Ebtehaj Kalantar

April 22, 2008

Canada - Le Devior - Original Article (French)

The old adage that “the first casualty of war is truth” is one to which the Pentagon has stuck to with unheard of will, strength, and consistency. Thanks to the Benedictine work a journalist from The New York Times - and there is no better word to describe it- we now know that the U.S. executive has applied itself to building a propaganda machine so powerful, that it highlights the disdain that Bush and company feed on with respect to democracy.

[The “Benedictine” New York Times reporter in question is David Barstow. The headline is Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand ].

Well before the tragedy of September 11, Torie Clarke, then boss of public relations at the Pentagon, had decided to set up a group of retirees within the military, capable of properly posing as television analysts. Obviously, she had taken particular care to ensure that these men shared the neoconservative views of the administration.

Quite simply, the group’s purpose was to subvert the work of traditional journalists who occupy the media space with experts in the pay of the Pentagon. The operation was successful beyond expectations and those of Donald Rumsfeld, then Secretary of Defense, and Dick Cheney, the Vice President. Thus these 80 generals and colonels who have regularly paraded on television screens have in fact proven to be the true chroniclers of the war in Iraq. And this, from the moment the White House had decided to overthrow Saddam Hussein. In other words, this slew of men of rank simply relayed and then covered up the lies about weapons of mass destruction.

Even worse, the major networks; CBS to CNN, not to be outdone by FOX, NBC and ABC, have repeatedly resorted to these soldiers without verifying whether they were part of the conflict of interest, as they do with journalists.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the United States.

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 24th, 2008 at 4:42 pm and is filed under CNN, Hypocrisy, The New York Times, Newspapers, Fox News, Wall Street Journal, Journalism, Pentagon, MSNBC, ABC News, Intelligence Community, CBS, Gerald Ford, NBC, Fox, Bush Administration, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Canada, Iraq, Foreign Affairs, Military, TV News, Foreign Politics, Scandals, Donald Rumsfeld, News, Quebec, Neoconservatives, Columnists, Original Reporting. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Understanding American Voters: ‘In God We Trust’ »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.