« Clinton: “This is not a coronation.” New Yorkers suppress gag reflex.
McCain Letterman Barb Exchanges Shows McCain’s Ease On TV »



Around The Campaign 2008 Sphere April 6, 2008

April 6th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

iuyt.gif

The conventional wisdom still has Senator Barack Obama ahead of Senator Hillary Clinton. Why do so many people hate Clinton? And is there a little-advertised way Democratic candidates can make it more likely that they win elections? Here’s our latest linkfest taking you to blogs of varying viewpoints, with a few comments of our own. Links do not necessarily reflect the opinion of TMV or its writers.

A New Poll Spells Bad News For The Republicans and Poliblog has the details.

A Way A Democratic Party Candidate Is More Likely To Win Election is (no joke) appearing on The Colbert Report.

Speaking Of Comedy Shows, Clinton Appeared On Leno and Dean Esmay has the video and wonders why some people virtually hate Hillary Clinton.

Bill Maher Has Some Advice for Democrats who want to Hillary Clinton to drop her bid.

It’s Obama Versus Clinton in North Dakota and Hillary Clinton is now arguing that pledged delegates can change their votes. The problem: for many many years Democrats, Republicans, liberals, centrists and conservatives all assumed that when they voted for delegates in a primary the delegates voted for the candidates they were pledged to vote for — not for a candidate they voted against. If balloting went way beyond the first ballot, you could see some shifts. If pledged delegates simply shifted allegiances because an opposing candidate made a verbal pitch to them, they would be in hot water politically and any candidate that got the nomination that way would face election obstacles. If he or she was elected, the candidate would take office as a highly polarizing figure who would have no reservoir of good will to fall back on when inevitable crises occurred. The biggest beneficiary of pledged delegates switching would be John McCain.

But Obama Has Problems Too: From the standpoint of Hillary Clinton supporters, the refusal to seat Michigan and Florida could cost Obama in November if he gets the nomination. See Taylor Marsh for that perspective.


Criticism Of Hillary Clinton’s Economic Plan From A Blogger – former Clinton administration Secretary of Labor Robert Reich. Yes, he has a blog (WANNA EXCHANGE LINKS?)

Clinton Had Another Verbal Inaccuracy Problem and although Hot Air’s lively Allahpundit among others blasts her for it, it seems as if this one has been as damaging as the I-ducked-sniper fire Bosnia fiasco. But these kinds of things will take a toll on the Clinton campaign as time goes on. It means that reporters and editors will now closely check and cross-check her every assertion. If this is due to sloppy campaign management (and this one sounds like it was poor staff-work) then Clinton needs to transfer or bring in some new staffers.


The “Moron Arguments” Of The Blogosphere (which come to full fruition during presidential campaigns) are dissected HERE.

Is GOP Presumptive Nominee John McCain Attacking Barack Obama For Being Too Self-Centered? Ann Althouse looks at the issue.

Steve Clemons Visits Room 871 of the Mayflower Hotel — A Room With INCREDIBLE Political Hubris in this MUST-READ POST of the day. Read it all for the total context but here is one quote that is interesting. Looking at the room and its hubris (which he explains) Clemons writes:

It reflects how I feel about Hillary Clinton’s Bosnia sniper story — or Barack Obama’s claims that he will stop climate change, end American dependence on foreign oil. Room 871 reminds me of John McCain’s walk through an Iraqi marketplace in a flak jacket and several squads of protective sniper and police forces. It reminds me of the Clinton’s $109 million take in eight years — and Hillary’s feigned surprise yesterday that her husband really could make money when he left public service. The room reminds of Obama getting a stage and sound crew to produce a tape — with echo effects and all — re-creating his October 2002 opposition to the Iraq War.

I think Barack Obama is going to win the Democratic primary in the end, but none of these folks deserves an easy win. I think it’s going to be a close race between McCain and the Dem nominee that is punctuated by bubbles of overstatement, hyperbole, just going too far with gravity-defying platitudes and rhetoric, and then busts when reality punctures the silliness.

Republicans Have A Huge Obstacle In 2008: the sagging economy (which conservative talker Sean Hannity last week said was merely undergoing an adjustment). Read Daniel DeRito’s take on it — and how GWB has now stumbled himself into a situation similar to his father’s.

For Those Who Think Obama Has Gotten A Pass From Maureen Dowd Tom Watson says think again. He says she has her “gaydar” on “stun.”

Anti War Conservatives Who Vote For Obama Will Be Disappointed predicts Professor Steven Bainbridge.

The Clintons Tax Returns: Donald Sensing (one of the best conservative bloggers) applauds the Clintons for what he sees.

Another Take On The Tax Returns: Red State.com notes that the Clinton’s charity begins at home.

A Blogger Covers A Hillary Clinton Rally In Oregon and gives full plus and minus details HERE.

Bob Barr May Run As A Libertarian but will he have an impact? Quite possibly…yes.

If You Look At The McCain And Obama Bumper Stickers you can see a big difference.



This entry was posted on Sunday, April 6th, 2008 at 9:28 am and is filed under Journalism, Republican Party, Approval Ratings, Internet, Democratic Party, Voting, Newsweek Blogitics, Superdelegates, North Carolina, Brokered Convention, Conventions, Primaries, News, Elections, Polls, Around The Sphere, Economy, 2008 Elections, Politics, Internet News Media, Democrats, Media, John McCain, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Republicans, Blogging. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Hillary's unlikablity comes from her arrogance and that self absorbtion. She is about herself. She also is not trustworthy and very much the corporate and establishment candidate. In many ways she is typical of the boring and cold candidates that the democrats have been banking on for 30 years. Mondale, Dukakis and the like. Candidates who are wooden and wonky and no personality. But, the establishment's pick.
    Just another clone of the losers we keep nominating and then lose in the general.
    As for winning.
    Democrats have to learn to proud of being democrats again. Not try to be republican lite. They need to find their voice and backbone. They cave in and then whine about it. They are embarrassing.
    Once the DLC got ahold of the party we became weak and silly and denied our roots.
    We also stuck with this losing 10 state strategy. Win as many traditional blue states and try to get some big north east states.
    Howard Dean and Barack Obama are going for the 50 state strategy and bringing new states into play and making the party competitive again. And growing the party in the long run.
    In Montana some cried after an Obama appearance because they mattered again and a major candidate came and brought his message personally to them. That is powerful.
    There are alot of moderate republicans willing to cross but, you have to let them know you want their vote and welcome them.
    it is so wonderful to see democratic conventional wisdom turned on it's head this year.
    • ^
    • v
    I am an Obama voter whio will vote Hillary IF SHE IS THE NOMINEE BY FAIR MEANS. I cant help but being struck and that is to put it mildly by the MI/FL disaster, firstly ho did it happen and whi in heaven sake no one tried to prevent it, then how come candidates who supposedly plegded ahead their acceptanec that those votes would be discounted now because they mightt matter , renegade their acceptance. by all means, did anyone warn them ahead it might come to this. How HRC can look in the face of voters and say---3well obame did not willingly put his name on the ballot, so he gets burned". HEY LADY, that was exactly what was supposed to happen- michigan and florida do not count. where do you live in another dimension ????
    so yes I am sad for those 2 states voters and really something should be done not to discount them altgether but rather to limit them and well yes they deserve to be punished- sorry they knew the rules.
    when you drive over the limit and yopu get busted , do you say to the trooper- sorry sir but I want the law to be rewritten...
    • ^
    • v
    You should have mentioned Albert Wynn resigned from his seat in the U.S. House. With primaries coming nine months before the general election, Maryland is stuck having to conduct a speical election to find a short term replacement for a Congressman who did not want to be a lame duck. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/ar...

    As the U.S. becomes a one party state, states should begin to move the primaries to June or later to keep from having too many lame ducks after the primaries.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Clinton: “This is not a coronation.” New Yorkers suppress gag reflex.
McCain Letterman Barb Exchanges Shows McCain’s Ease On TV »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.