Around The Campaign 2008 Sphere

June 8th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

iuyt.gif

Hillary Clinton is being praised for The Speech which is leaving Obama supporters relieved, Clinton supporters ecstatic over its delivery and positive feedback, and Republicans suspicious or disappointed because she strongly called for unity. It’s just one of the topics buzzing Around The Campaign 2008 Sphere on blogs. Here’s a cross section of campaign-related blog links:

A PLEA FOR PARTY UNITY FROM A PRO-CLINTON BLOGGER who is not making a demand that Barack Obama place Hillary Clinton on the ticket. And he made the call for unity before her speech yesterday, which led to some pro-Clinton supporters now saying unity will be ok with them since Hillary urges them to come together. Yet another thoughtful post from Tom Watson.

SPEAKING OF BEFORE CLINTON’S SATURDAY SPEECH, A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE DUMPING ON CLINTON AFTER HER TUESDAY SPEECH but Gary Farber had made a plea even then for Clean Slate Day and here’s why.

A LOT OF PRO-HILLARY BLOGGERS SAY THEY WILL SUPPORT OBAMA
now that Clinton has urged them to. One is The Democratic Daily’s Pamela Levy, but she can’t be dismissed as someone who takes her marching orders from Clinton. Levy was a strong supporter of John Kerry’s and has remained one of the Internet’s most thoughtful pro-Clinton bloggers (which is why her blog is always a joy to read).

YOU COULD PREDICT THAT SOME FOLKS ON HILLARY CLINTON’S STAFF WILL INSIST THEY DIDN’T CONTRIBUTE TO HER DEFEAT
by turning the “inevitable” candidate into the “evitable” candidate — but believe it or not Mark Penn is now saying just that.

SO NOW OBAMA IS OFF AND RUNNING? Red State.com says in an appearance in Virginia Obama was off and limping…

BUT OBAMA IS DOING SOMETHING DIFFERENTLY: He’s mapping a nationwide push to go after GOP strongholds.

WHAT SHOULD EVERY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE SAY? What Libertarian Bob Barr said..

IS OBAMA THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY’S
“trophy wife?” A MUST READ at Pajamas Media.

My personal response to this piece: Just as I would reject any appeal for this independent voter’s vote on the grounds that Obama is an African-American and is therefore entitled to my vote (or the Democratic party’s nomination) on the basis of race, suggestions still being made that Clinton was entitled to the nomination don’t fly. Rather, in the short term and future, Clinton supporters should point to the content of her speech yesterday, her impressive performance in debates, excellent record as a Senator who responds to constituents, firm grasp of issues, political nimbleness — and the fact that the United States is way behind other countries who’ve had woman as chief executives. No one is ENTITLED to the nomination or higher office because of his/her race or gender or religion (take THAT Joe Lieberman) and appeals for votes or sympathy fall flat on some (like me).

HOW OBAMA WON AND HILLARY LOST is examined by former Bush associate Mathew Dowd. Here’s his opening:

A year ago, Hillary Clinton was 30-points ahead over any rival in the Democratic primary. She had outraised everyone at that point by more than a two to one margin. She had the backing of the majority of the Democratic establishment. She had the backing of a popular former president who happened to be her husband. And she lost.

So what happened?

Like any story, the reasons and causes aren’t easily reduced to a one paragraph explanation and there were multiple causes for why Clinton lost. I will reflect on just on a few from my perspective.

This is a race that Clinton could have won and should have won, and came very close. And her gender ultimately didn’t have much to do with the loss.

The following is my attempt at explaining what happened:

Read the post to find out his reasons. I agree with all of his reasons, particularly the ones about change and a changed electorate. But especially with #5: When books are written about Hillary’s campaign, it will be noted by serious analysts that she would have fared far better if she had bought a case of duct tape and used it on Bill. Go back and trace the Hillary Clinton campaign. She was JUST emerging from his shadow into a skilled national politician in her own right in debates and on the stump when Bill stopped being the largely-silent spouse and jumped into the fray. And, yesterday, she emerged squarely OUT of his shadow, found her OWN voice in her speech in terms of content, delivery and eloquence…and even her critics cheered.

THE SO CALLED MICHELLE OBAMA “WHITEY” TAPE/DVD has generated satires on the Internet and warnings from the blog that seems to want it pushed into American political discourse — after all, that IS the issue Americans care about as they can barely fill their gas tanks, file for unemployment insurance, and write letters to their sons and daughters in Iraq — that it is real and will come out by October. Anything is possible in American politics, where discrediting and demonizing is now a fine art. But the always individualistic Hart Williams thinks “Obama’s attackers have created a new kind of fallacy: not ‘Guilt by Association’ but ‘Guilt by Free Association.” Read his post (Warning: It contains some adult language.)

SPEAKING OF THE POLITICAL GET A LIFE DEPARTMENT
, when Barack Obama and his wife Michelle gave a fist bump most people with lives shrugged. But some saw something perhaps sinister. Read Political scientist Steven Taylor’s look at this “issue.” P.S. Even if a talking (empty) head on a news network uses it to hype an upcoming segment, it illustrates how American politics and some journalism is increasingly mired in the petty and in the use of “high concept” negative imagery.

SOME AFRICAN-AMERICAN RESPONSES TO BARACK OBAMA’S ACHIEVEMENT comes via Shay at Booker Rising who got detailed responses from her relatives. A MUST READ. Booker Rising has long been one of TMV’s favorite blogs. It MIScharacterizes itself as a “news site for black moderates and black conservatives” because it is so tastefully and thoughtfully done and has so much diverse content that it is a daily required reading news site for political junkies anywhere…

IF YOU’RE SOMEONE WHO CAN UNDERSTAND BOB DYLAN, FYI he has endorsed Barack Obama (and some still find it hard to understand what he said when he said that…).

FORMER GOVERNOR MIKE HUCKABEE HAS SOMETIMES PUT HIS FOOT IN HIS MOUTH but he helped get some lodged food out of a candidate’s windpipe. Quite classy — except for the lame comment made after by another GOPer.

AND SINCE YOU READ THESE BLOG POSTS
then consider how blogging has changed…


UPDATE:
YET ANOTHER SUGGESTION OF ENTITLEMENT
: The newest one is that if Obama doesn’t pick Hillary Clinton for Vice President Obama will be dividing the party. Question: if the person who gets the Vice Presidential slot is the one who got the next largest number of votes, then why bother with Veep selections? Or hasn’t it been that the Presidential nominee balances political needs and then makes a decision. There is no entitlement to the V.P. slot.




This entry was posted on Sunday, June 8th, 2008 at 8:20 am and is filed under Internet, Independents, Democratic Party, Mike Huckabee, Get A Life Club, Journalism, Republican Party, Blog Roundup, Demonization, Negative Campaigning, Newsweek Blogitics, John McCain, Media, Internet News Media, Around The Sphere, 2008 Elections, Politics, Independent Voters, Democrats, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Republicans, John Kerry, Blogging. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.