Western Media Teaches China a ‘Lesson’

April 29th, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN

[Het Parool, The Netherlands]

One must hand it to the Beijing authorities. It takes tremendous gall for a regime that outlaws press freedom or open criticism of any kind, to liken the failure of Western reporters to parrot the Communist Party line to a lapse of journalistic ethics.

According to Shen Xinggeng, senior Desk Editor at the strictly state-controlled People’s Daily:

“If news reporters don’t respect basic facts, how can they talk so glibly about ‘objectivity and fairness’? During news coverage, Western media regularly underscores objectivity and fairness; whereas in China there is said to be only propaganda or preaching. … It seems that in the West, ‘press freedom’ means the ‘freedom to spread rumors,’ the ‘freedom to tell lies,’ the ‘freedom to make distortions,’ the freedom to ‘vilify’ and the freedom to ’spread slander.’”

Ironically, Mr. Shen ends by saying that thanks to the West’s perceived lack of journalistic ethics, ‘even average people, let alone students of journalism’ received a lesson in true journalistic objectivity.

By Shen Xinggeng

April 29, 2008

People’s Republic of China - People’s Daily - Original Article (English)

Western media have been “lecturing” us of late. On March 14, an act of serial criminality involving assaults, the destruction of property, looting and arson took place in Lhasa, with Western media paying extraordinary attention. These media outlets are, among others, Agence France Presse, RTL and NTL of Germany, the British Broadcasting Corporation of Britain, and the Washington Post and CNN of the United States.

The mass of readers and viewers, nevertheless, can hardly fathom these lengthy reports: How can obvious homicide and arson committed by a few law-breakers be cited as “peaceful protest,” and how can the frenzied assault on law-enforcement personnel who failed to hit back when attacked be called the suppression of Tibetans by the Chinese government?

Even worse, CNN host Jack Cafferty maliciously attacked Chinese products as “junk,” and the Chinese people as, “basically the same bunch of goons and thugs they’ve been for the last 50 years.” He simply curses and swears, “like a shrew letting loose a stream of abuse in the street.” [Editor’s Note: A shrew is defined as an ill-tempered woman.]

Therefore, ordinary people in China can no longer stand what Western media have been doing. Hence, Chinese have been quietly collecting and sifting through huge amounts of ironclad proof, and have replied with a forceful rebuttal that has exposed the false reports of the Western media. Meanwhile, nationals of the Chinese origin and Chinese expatriates and students have held mammoth but peaceful and virtuous protests and demonstrations in the United States, Britain, Germany and France to protests the distorted reporting of Western media.

The rebuttal by Chinese Netizens and the protests of Chinese expats (and students) around the world have been unprecedented, both in terms of scale and effect - and they far-exceeded the expectations of those cocky, arrogant media people in the West. That said, I would very much like to raise two questions for people to dwell upon

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing foreign press coverage of the unfolding story regarding China and the West.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 29th, 2008 at 5:26 pm and is filed under Freedom of the Press, News, TV News, Political Philosophy, Human Rights, Journalism, CNN, Newspapers, Media, Cartoon Commentary, Europe, China, Education, Foreign Affairs, Political Cartoons, Freedom of Speech, Media Criticism, Blogging. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Jon Stewart’s take on the Rev. Wright »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.