Around The Sphere Blogging Roundup October 29, 2007

October 29th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

joe_globe.jpg

Our link-fest offering readers links to blog posts from websites of many different viewpoints. Linked posts do NOT necessarily reflect the opinion of TMV or its writers.

INVESTIGATIVE ORIGINAL BLOG REPORTING ON JAMES DOBSON comes via TMV co-blogger Shaun Mullen on his own excellent site, Kiko’s House. This post is a MUST READ because a) of the content b) it is the epitome of how weblogs can allow an individual to do actual serious reporting and not have to give it to an editor (or publisher). It’s the kind of report you’d see in a magazine.

The piece’s title is “Why Is Gay Hating James Dobson Still Licensed As a Therapist in Colorado?” Here are three brief excerpts. The provocative lead:

The Reverend James Dobson, full to overflowing with the ego-tripping insouciance of a man of the cloth who is doing God’s bidding, is used to getting his way. And being downright un-Christian when it comes to gays.

And a sample of some of the info:

Despite being totally out of step with his own profession regarding homosexuality, Dobson remains a licensed marriage and family therapist in Colorado.

Two former members of that state’s Board of Marriage and Family Therapists, speaking anonymously, said that Dobson’s dual role is improper and demeans the profession, but the board’s hands are tied because of a waiver in state law.

“He can’t have it both ways,” said one of the former board members of Dobson’s dual role as a gay-bashing preacher who claims he can cure homosexuality and a licensed therapist. “Is he dealing with someone as a therapist or as a minister? There has to be a distinction.”

[Further down]…The former board members said that the board has received several grievances against Dobson over the years.

Read it in its entirety. It is sure to spark debate due to its content And it’s also an example of how blogging can use original reporting to make blog posts more than extended op-ed pieces.

EVANGELICALS AND THE 2008: So what’s going on? CLICK HERE.

FORMER PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER ISN’T BIG B.O
. in the sense of “box office,” that is. A new documentary about the former President has proven as popular with moviegoers as his presidency was with voters. Here are the details.

THE CONTROVERSIAL DAVID HOROWITZ WAS HECKLED OFF THE STAGE AT EMORY UNIVERSITY but the college’s Muslim community opposed interfering with him and defended his right to free speech.

It’s Salon’s Glenn Greenwald Against General Petraeus’ Spokesman in a very fiery email exchange with a lot of weblogs jumping in. Here’s the intro:

I received this morning an unsolicited email from Col. Steven A. Boylan, the Public Affairs Officer and personal spokesman for Gen. David G. Petraeus (see UPDATE III below). The subject line of the email — which I am publishing in full, unedited form here — is “The growing link between the U.S. military and right-wing media and blogs,” which is the title of the post I wrote earlier this week regarding the politicization of the Army in Iraq, as evidenced by its constant coordination with, and leaking to, the likes of Matt Drudge, The Weekly Standard, and the most extremist right-wing blogs — in the TNR/Beauchamp case and also more generally.

I had a prior e-mail exchange with Col. Boylan several months ago when I requested an interview with Gen. Petraeus after he had granted an exclusive interview to far-right partisan Hugh Hewitt (author of the 2006 prescient tract: Painting the Map Red: The Fight to Create a Permanent Republican Majority). In terms of whether the U.S. Army under Petraeus and Boylan is, in fact, becoming a political actor, I’ll let multiple passages from Boylan’s email to me this morning speak for itself:

Read the whole post and make up your own mind on this issue.

The issue of posting what were meant as private emails is a prickly one. It’s considered a no-no in most cases, even though some blogs run notes about anything emailed being subject to being published. About two years ago, TMV was under fire from a blog and I wrote a very angry response and included some emails from a blogger. A top blogger happened to see it a minute after it went on the site and he immediately called me and asked: “Do you REALLY want to do that? That does not sound like you.” He explained that posting emails — especially when you’re angry — is not wise. I realized it was wrong ethically and I was in fact using my site to personally vent anger rather than presenting readers with info or commentary.

In this case, Greenwald argues that running the emails is OK since since he is dealing with a news source (or an associate of one) and due to some other issues (outlined in his post). If the email wasn’t stipulated as private, coming from a news source, the case could be made as he makes that it is publishable. Greenwald also raises several other bigger issues such as whether officialdom selectively leaks and cooperates with Internet sites that it feels will just take its stuff and run it without facing challenging questioning — or just leak to people on its political side (which is can of worms since the military is not supposed to be partisan). YOU DECIDE…

AND TO HELP YOU HERE ARE A FEW OTHER MUST-READ PERSPECTIVES here, here, here, here and here and of course the always-comprehensive memeorandum has a ton.

SOME PEOPLE ARE LEAVING THEIR POLITICAL PARTY...the Libertarian Party.

HAS THE GOP RACE BOILED DOWN NOW TO McCAIN OR GIULIANI? Some think so.

THESE DAYS IF CALIFORNIANS DON’T LOSE THEIR HOMES IN FIRES THEY CAN LOSE THEM IN FORECLOSURES as the state is becoming “Foreclosure City.”

POPULAR ELECTION OF JUDGES:
Is it a good idea or is there a better way?




This entry was posted on Monday, October 29th, 2007 at 12:10 am and is filed under Around The Sphere, Blogging. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.