Talk Show Host Randi Rhodes Explains Her Injury On Her Show

October 19th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief


Yours truly is on a monster drive from San Diego in Southern California to the Sacramento area in Northern California — and yesterday got to hear the opening of the Randi Rhodes show.

Unless you were on Venus, the news cycle and the blogosphere were peppered earlier this week with a report stemming from comments made by one of Randi Rhodes’ colleagues (Air America talk show hosts) that the progressive talk radio’s popular afternoon host had been mugged while in New York City, possibly by someone with a political axe to grind. This wasn’t the first story involving a talk show host who was injured over the years…but it proved the most dubious in the end.

After the report circulated and blossomed into an ideological blog firestorm — with the tone of some (but NOT all) blog posts related to whether they agreed with Rhodes politically or not — news stories surfaced that there in fact had been no mugging and never was a police report. Rhodes’ lawyer denied there was a mugging too. It remained a strange story.

Yesterday, on her show, Rhodes went through what she said was the chronology, about how she was in NYC and was smoking a cigarette when she believes she was somehow pushed and wound up face down with many of her teeth smashed and her face a mess. According to Rhodes, she had no idea what happened, no concrete details of how she wound up face down on the pavement with bits of her teeth around her and she told her employer that she had been mugged and had broken teeth and would not be in the next day.

Sub host John Elliot then made his (in)famous comments suggesting Rhodes may have been hurt by someone on the right, a charge which was picked up by a blog which was widely linked to online…and by a zillion weblogs. (Elliot later issued an apology for going on the air and stating that assumption). News stories popped up about something happened to Rhodes.

Rhodes seemed most irked yesterday at the fact that a friend called her and told her to turn on TV and the Internet and that she did only to discover it was being said with certainty that she had been brutally mugged in New York City and that right wingers likely did it. She was aghast because no one had interviewed her and she herself had no proof that anyone on the right was involved or that she had indeed been mugged.

She found herself pursued by news and media photographers who camped out near her place and wanted a photo of her and her injuries, she said. And she seemed most angry that no media types ever asked her how she was feeling and wished her well — but only saw her as a kind of media commodity. They only wanted to get a photo of her injuries. One, she said, even asked her doorman if there was a secret list that would allow her to get up into Rhodes’ room.

Rhodes said it was a lesson to her in how the modern media works — stories go out with no confirmation written by reporters who don’t even ask how she is doing and the blogs go wild (but she expressed thanks to blogs who wished her well and seemed concerned over her health). She said she still has no real idea of how really it all happened.

Meanwhile, if you do Google Searches you’ll see there are other versions of what some say happened — all speculative, all using blind sources.

And its interesting to note that these blind sources that offer uncharitable explanations online as to what happened are people who seemingly don’t like Rhodes’ views. Everything is now so politicized in America that she is given the benefit of the doubt by those who agree with her, by some who don’t but there is a segment that will automatically offer theories that could be considered almost slanderous if offered about someone who was a non-public figure. It’s all part of the automatic discredit-those-with-whom-you-disagree style of American politics that has permeated the entire culture.

There are also other rumors and genuine speculation bubbling in the background — but that’s the nature of the infomedia beast.

And for now (unless a news organization or a well-funded supermarket tabloid picks up on it and says otherwise) the operative explanation of what happened is Rhodes: she believes she was somehow bumped or pushed from behind, fell down forcefully right on her face, let her employer know she thought she was mugged but never filed a police report, was aghast at media and blogosphere reaction and the way it mushroomed into a story stated with near certainty about an ideological attack -and she was back on the air after painful and extensive emergency dental surgery.

FOOTNOTE: Yours truly barely can post from this location so my own posts will be limited today and won’t appear until much later.

This entry was posted on Friday, October 19th, 2007 at 6:24 am and is filed under Celebrities, Media, News, MSM, Journalism, Progressives, Republicans, Democrats, Politics, Entertainment, Conservatives, Liberals, Internet News Media, Media Criticism, Blogging. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


The True Face of the Muslim Brotherhood? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.