The Four Day Grind

August 14th, 2008
By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor

Print Print

While it has cropped up many times over the years, another unanticipated bit of fallout from surging energy costs has been a renewed interest in both telecommuting and the four day work week. Chrysler is looking into it again, Howard County, Md. has adopted it, along with Brevard County Community College in Florida, among others. Some of these early adopters are seeing benefits in the form of reduced energy costs at office locations and improved employee productivity and satisfaction. The workers also realize savings in gas and related expenses for work travel, less time spent commuting and more time spent with family.

Other employers are moving toward allowing eployees to work from home. Such telecommuters realize the ultimate savings in gas and flexibility of schedules. Neither of these systems, however, are without isses and concerns. Not all types of industries have work which can be done remotely. (If you’re the person who attaches widget number 217A to Frame Subsection B3, you really can’t do it from home.) Retail outlets, of course, can’t simply close down operations for an extra day per week without suffering losses of revenue. There are also concerns regarding productivity, particularly among younger workers in less responsible positions who may require more supervision.

So what do you think? Is this generally a boon or a bust? Or is it situational? We’ll be talking about that, and a few places which are experimenting with such plans today on Mid Stream Radio at 1 pm eastern, 10 am pacific. Feel free to stop by and share your thoughts.




This entry was posted on Thursday, August 14th, 2008 at 7:17 am and is filed under Blog Talk Radio, Social Commentary, Corporations, Society, Business. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 4 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    I have visited a few industrial plants that experimented with 10 hour days. they said that they lost too much productivitiy. 10 hours of clock time equals 11 hours at the job and with commutes, a 13 hours days. they said that productivity fell off in the last two hours that it did not make up for the energy consumption.

    However, I could stores in the exurbs opening much later in the day during Monday through Thursday to save money.
    • ^
    • v
    I remember when BigOil was price-fixing gas over $5 a gallon here recently and on the news I'd see BigOil talking heads interviewed telling us to "stop complaining" "keep driving like usual" "I'm keeping MY SUV [implied: you're an idiot if you don't].

    I say, any activity that reduces the consumption of gasoline and any oil product is at the VERY TOP of my to-do list. If four-day workweeks cut way back on gas use. Do it.

    If trading in your SUV or keeping it parked just for off-road excursions and carpooling or using a second economy car most times keeps BigOil from profiting.. Do it.

    If switching to geothermal from coal and oil (or even nuclear) power plants cuts hugely into BigOil profits or their shareholding (in coal and nuclear)... Do it.

    Do every single possible thing you can think of to reduce the profits of BigOil. I don't like the fact that they're leading us into WWIII.
    • ^
    • v
    Where I work in Detroit metro we're on a 9-80 schedule; every other Friday we have off, a three-day weekend every other weekend. (If only gasoline were cheap again so I could take advantage of that and enjoy it!) Working nine or ten hours a day is commonplace, anyway.

    "Do every single possible thing you can think of to reduce the profits of Big[ ]Oil."

    Have you bombed any service stations yet or hijacked and destroyed any tankers?
    • ^
    • v
    "stores in the exurbs opening much later in the day "

    That would be ideal, too, in the Upstate NY city I lived in for two years; there are more people on welfare than ever there now. Let them sleep off the party of the previous night before opening the stores.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.