Yesterday, I attempted to explain how using a too-simple model in a complex conflict could lead to disaster.
In that post, I used some examples from history, and in doing so, I have been misinterpreted as making moral-equivalency arguments. I have written a clarification contending that in the current war, however you name it, a War on Terror or a Great Struggle Against Violent Extremism, we must remove the “moral” implications in order to win.