Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Apr 6, 2006 in At TMV | 3 comments

House Passes Measure That’ll Hurt Mostly Democrats

So much for meaningful reform that tries to seriusly fix the system in general. Instead we get yet another demonstration about why one-party rule has proven to be a disaster in terms of authentic problem solving and biparitsan solutions:

The House approved campaign finance legislation last night that would benefit Republicans by placing strict caps on contributions to nonprofit committees that spent heavily in the last election while removing limits on political parties’ spending coordinated with candidates.

The bill passed 218 to 209 in a virtual party-line vote.

So there you have it. How much more of a demonstration of naked voting for political interest do Americans need to conclude: divided government is much better for the country (no matter which party controls the White House). More from the Washington Post:

Lifting party spending limits would aid Republican candidates because the GOP has consistently raised far more money than the Democratic Party. Similarly, barring “527” committees from accepting large unregulated contributions known as “soft money” would disadvantage Democrats, whose candidates enjoyed a disproportionate share of the $424 million spent by nonprofit committees in 2003-2004.

The 527 committees, named for a section of the tax law, are tax-exempt organizations that use voter mobilization and issue-based ads to influence federal elections. They grew in importance after the 2002 McCain-Feingold campaign finance law barred federal candidates and national parties from accepting unlimited donations from individuals, unions and corporations.

In 2003-2004, for example, international financier George Soros broke all contribution records by giving a total of $27 million to pro-Democratic groups such as America Coming Together and the Media Fund.

On the other hand, the GOPers do have one point: Soros’ whopping donations skirted the McCain-Feingold act. But what passed in the House is such a lopsiddely partisa exercise in raw power politics that it’s undermines their initial objections and seems to be saying: “We have the votes. See? We can do whatever we want.” And, indeed, the Post says it’s unlikely to pass in the Senate:

Although the measure’s prospects for approval in the Senate are considered slim, House Republicans wanted a vote on what they could describe as “reform” legislation. At the same time, GOP leaders sought to embarrass Democrats by making them vote in apparent support of the use of soft money in federal campaigns.

In other words it was:

— to get something on record for the elections campaign.
— so they could point to something during the campaign saying they are “reformers.”

They are to reformers what Iran’s President is to a rabbi.

UPDATE: Captain Ed disagrees that thinks it’s a step in the right direction and lays out his case (read in full but here’s a small part of it):

I disagree with Joe on this issue. The eruption of 527s did not reform the system at all. Even Joe acknowledges that this offshoot of the BCRA allowed millions of dollars to pour into campaigns from single benefactors such as George Soros. It laughably treated this money as somehow more pure than that going to political parties, even though its use was at least as partisan as any given directly to Democrats. Even worse, it put that money in the hands of people who have no accountability in the political process and allowed the parties and candidates to wash their hands of the messages it produced.

It’s this kind of mischief that occurs when people try to create artificial categories for cash and attempt to impose limits on its collection and usage…

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2006 The Moderate Voice
  • Pyst

    Ah yes republicans ensuring their big money corporate donors are good as gold. Somehow the slime that oozes from them doesn’t surprise me a bit. All big money donations should be done away with, and nothing but small indivisual donations allowed, but republicans would get hammered in donations if that happened, since they aren’t as popular as they think they are.

  • Jim

    Partisan politics, gotta love em. Guess we’ll see if any republicans have a spine and call it what it is. I doubt it though.

  • Mike P.

    Single-party control has proved disastrous, certainly with the players on stage now, and even (though I believe to a lesser degree) during similar times when the Dems were on top. At the macro level, the single biggest reason to vote for principled Democrats in ’06, IMHO.

    Leave it to Cap’n Ed to screech “Soros” while forgetting about T. Boone Pickens (funding of the Swift Boaters) etc., etc. on the Right. No surprise there though.

    PING:
    TITLE: A Step In The Right Direction
    BLOG NAME: Captain’s Quarters
    The House passed a bill slamming the lid on 527 advocacy groups of the kind that proliferated in the last presidential election and removed the limits for national parties to coordinate funds with specific candidates. The measure passed on a…

    PING:
    TITLE: House Votes to Cap 527s
    BLOG NAME: Outside The Beltway | OTB
    WaPo fronts a story entitled, “Campaign Finance Measure Approved” with the ominous subtitle “House Bill Would Cap ‘527′ Donations, Used Largely by Democrats.”
    The House approved campaign finance legislation last nigh…

    PING:
    TITLE: 527s 86’d
    BLOG NAME: UNCoRRELATED
    The House-approved campaign finance bill that effectively caps contributions to 527 committees , is getting slammed by Democrats as “one-sided” Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said the measure is designed to tilt campaign finance in favor of the GOP and will not change the public image of this session as “the Congress that Jack and Tom built.” He was referring to former powerful GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who pleaded guilty in January to fraud,…

    PING:
    TITLE: The unexamined meme is not worth propagating.
    BLOG NAME: Divided We Stand United We Fall
    Other Voices in support of Divided Government. -Joe Gandelman’s post “House Passes Measure That’ll Hurt Mostly Democrats” at The Moderate Voice:
    “So much for meaningful reform that tries to seriusly fix the system in general. Instead we get yet another demonstration about why one-party rule has proven to be a disaster in terms of authentic problem solving and biparitsan solutions…”

    PING:
    TITLE: Design and Hosting
    BLOG NAME: Design and Hosting
    Read more about Design and Hosting

    PING:
    TITLE: Day memorial
    BLOG NAME: Day memorial
    Read more about Day memorial

    PING:
    TITLE: Alfuzosin
    BLOG NAME: Alfuzosin
    Read more about Alfuzosin

    PING:
    TITLE: http://tinyurl.co.uk/rsb5
    BLOG NAME:
    Read more about

    PING:
    TITLE: http://tinyurl.co.uk/rsb5
    BLOG NAME:
    Read more about

    PING:
    TITLE: http://tinyurl.co.uk/lo62
    BLOG NAME:
    Read more about

    PING:
    TITLE: http://tinyurl.co.uk/5ah9
    BLOG NAME:
    Read more about

    PING:
    TITLE: Macie
    BLOG NAME: Macie
    Read more about Macie

    PING:
    TITLE: Kiara
    BLOG NAME: Kiara
    Read more about Kiara

    PING:
    TITLE: Raegan
    BLOG NAME: Raegan
    Read more about Raegan

    PING:
    TITLE: effexor
    BLOG NAME: effexor
    Read more about effexor

    PING:
    TITLE: paxil
    BLOG NAME: paxil
    Read more about paxil

    PING:
    TITLE: paxil
    BLOG NAME: paxil
    Read more about paxil

    PING:
    TITLE: paxil
    BLOG NAME: paxil
    Read more about paxil

    PING:
    TITLE: effexor
    BLOG NAME: effexor
    Read more about effexor

    PING:
    TITLE: accutane
    BLOG NAME: accutane
    Read more about accutane

    PING:
    TITLE: skin-condition
    BLOG NAME: skin-condition
    Read more about skin-condition

    PING:
    TITLE: inflammatory-disease
    BLOG NAME: inflammatory-disease
    Read more about inflammatory-disease

    PING:
    TITLE: balding
    BLOG NAME: balding
    Read more about balding

    PING:
    TITLE: hickey
    BLOG NAME: hickey
    Read more about hickey

    PING:
    TITLE: whiteheads
    BLOG NAME: whiteheads
    Read more about whiteheads

    PING:
    TITLE: inflammatory-disease
    BLOG NAME: inflammatory-disease
    Read more about inflammatory-disease

    PING:
    TITLE: inflammatory-disease
    BLOG NAME: inflammatory-disease
    Read more about inflammatory-disease

    PING:
    TITLE: balding
    BLOG NAME: balding
    Read more about balding

    PING:
    TITLE: lexapro
    BLOG NAME: lexapro
    Read more about lexapro

    PING:
    TITLE: tenuate
    BLOG NAME: tenuate
    Read more about tenuate

    PING:
    TITLE: tenuate
    BLOG NAME: tenuate
    Read more about tenuate

    PING:
    TITLE: Kia
    BLOG NAME: Kia
    Read more about Kia

    PING:
    TITLE: Fisker
    BLOG NAME: Fisker
    Read more about Fisker

    PING:
    TITLE: Fiat
    BLOG NAME: Fiat
    Read more about Fiat

    PING:
    TITLE: Holden
    BLOG NAME: Holden
    Read more about Holden

    PING:
    TITLE: Yamaha
    BLOG NAME: Yamaha
    Read more about Yamaha

    PING:
    TITLE: Used cars
    BLOG NAME: Used cars
    Read more about Used cars

    PING:
    TITLE: Aston martin
    BLOG NAME: Aston martin
    Read more about Aston martin

    PING:
    TITLE: Infiniti
    BLOG NAME: Infiniti
    Read more about Infiniti

Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com