« On “Mavericks,” “Change,” and Centrists
Kicking Oil Addiction: Europe Looks At Sahara Sun »



McCain’s Desperation and the Return of the Politics of Rove

July 22nd, 2008
By ELROD

Print Print

These must be desperate times in the McCain camp because the old maverick politics have given way to the full Rove. Here’s what John McCain had to say today:

This is a clear choice that the American people have. I had the courage and the judgment to say I would rather lose a political campaign than lose a war. It seems to me that Obama would rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.

Joe Klein says he hasn’t seen a candidate get this bad in nine Presidential campaigns. In fact, Klein calls this “scurrilous” charge McCain’s meltdown that “smacks of desperation.”

Why is it so bad, even in this era of hyper-partisanship? There are five reasons why this new line is not only wrong for McCain but self-defeating.

1. John McCain was supposed to be above this sort of stuff. He basically accused Obama of selling out his country for political gain. McCain, to his credit, denounced the quasi-racist rants of Cincinnati radio man Bill Cunningham and the leader of my state (Tennessee) GOP Bill Hobbs and his “Muslim garb” release. McCain seemed to be above this sort of thing. Apparently he is not.

2. Who will be most put off by this? Independents. One thing I’ve learned from participating on this blog with Joe Gandelman is that Independents do not like all the mud-slinging, fear mongering, and accusations of treason. In 2004 Bush could get away with that because he ran a base election and not a play for the middle. McCain, on the other hand, NEEDS to do well among Independents in order to win. These tactics will only turn Independents off and McCain looks, well, unpresidential.

3. Why is this unpresidential? As Joe Klein reminds us, the President is not supposed to say these things. Ever. Surrogates can throw this stuff around all they want. As Klein says, “There is a reason why politicians who want to be President don’t say these sort of things: It isn’t presidential. A President exists in the straitjacket of literality. His words mean something. So John McCain has to literally believe that Barack Obama would “rather lose a war in order to win a political campaign.” I can’t imagine that he does. He popped off, out of frustration.” It makes McCain look small and petty and no better than Sean Hannity or any other right-wing hack. Again, McCain cannot afford that.

4. Another reason McCain can’t afford it is that it appears like McCain has lost control of himself. One of the charges against him was his hot temper. It’s hard to think of a more intemperate remark than to accuse your political opponent of wanting to lose a war rather than lose an election. Again, no matter how much the right wing actually believes this, the candidate can NOT say this.

5. A final reason why this charge is so destructive is that it will only rally Democrats who might have been lukewarm to Obama. One thing Democrats remember all too well is the charge that Kerry was weak on terrorism and that his election would actually make us lose the war on terror. Democrats are VERY sensitive to charges of lack of patriotism. Almost all Democrats opposed the surge. In fact, most Independents opposed it too. How would all those voters like to be told that they would rather lose a war than an election? Like Obama, they opposed the surge for good reasons - mostly that Iraq was a strategic blunder and that we need to spend our resources elsewhere. This is a stark reminder to Democrats that McCain’s politics, in the end, are no more “elevated” than Bush’s.

If John McCain is trying to alienate Independents and galvanize Democrats then he is doing a fine job of it with this new tactic. If he is trying to win an election, he might want to take a breather, let Obama have his day overseas, and go after him next week. Because right now, not only is Barack Obama clearing a major hurdle on the way to the White House, he is making John McCain look petulant and out of control.



This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008 at 11:57 pm and is filed under As Yet Unassigned. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 6 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« On “Mavericks,” “Change,” and Centrists
Kicking Oil Addiction: Europe Looks At Sahara Sun »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.