From Florida to SuperTuesday: Riding Straight, All Tack Flanging, Hell Bent For Leather Into the Homestretch

January 30th, 2008
By DR. CLARISSA PINKOLA ESTÉS, Assistant Editor, TMV Columnist

Print Print

Horses running a race can be most easily injured in the home stretch.

Why? Because their jockeys can become over-enthused with the thrill of the neck and neck, with the small gains made on the inside curve of the track, losing focus on riding the horse evenhandedly, and instead being swept away in a thrall of jerking speed and imagined glory… aiming too soon for the finish line.

Thus, possibly the greatest threat to each Presidential candidate now, is not the other competing candidates.

My dad who followed the ponies, said Willie Shoemaker, the diminutive 4′11″ thoroughbred jockey who raced and won at Belmont, Preakness and The Kentucky Derby, rode smooth in the homestretch, like the wind over mountains, but not like a tornado…

else even a masterful rider can accidentally cripple his horse in the final moments and scotch his own finish.

Thus one of the greatest threats to the candidates now with the homestretch in sight, is they might in the thrall of the final moments of the race, read their own abilities wrongly; they might falter on the timing to take their butt-high stances in the stirrups, and to fatally abandon their steady lean into the reins, whirling instead and losing focus.

Willie Shoemaker again: “I lost the K. Derby in ‘57 because I stood in the stirrups too soon; I’d misjudged the finish line.”

To judge the finish line in error, and to allow aggression, enthusiasm and the thrill of it all to unwisely influence his or her choices in strategy during the coming days… that ought to be the prime consideration of the candidates.

Too cock-sure, and votes will be lost while the candidate’s benefactors unwisely cheer. Too timid, and votes will be lost while the benefactors cheer, for they do not see the falter, only the love of their candidate.

For a candidate to become lost in his or her own cheering section, or to be snagged by the jeering of those who would try to decimate him or her… either one of these will cause a deadly veering, a loss of judgment and focus in the homestretch.

Every horse has its tolerances for endurance and speed; a race is not won by ‘full speed all the way,’ but by ‘resting speed’ and ‘all out speed,’ in tandem, measured and irregular intervals. Thus now, even small mis-steps in timing or velocity of words and actions can prove disastrous to the candidates.

The signs of the finish line? The February date, of course. But as much, what we see now: the consolidation of former candidates suddenly standing behind candidates still chucking forward in the race. Public talk, by name, about potential vice-presidents. Many pundits repeating themselves endlessly with little new to say. Frontrunners growing bolder, more muscled. The veins showing.

It’s now or never to prepare for the final sprint. Holding back will not win. But neither will charging aggressively ahead too soon.

Like my father said about Willie Boy: “It takes a nobody to ride a horse, but it takes finesse to win.”

That ’standing in the stirrups too soon,’ comes from the human instinct called agressio in Latin, meaning to attack, but not only with mal-intent,

Agression also can mean to behave with intent and over the top with humor, so that one becomes giddy instead of serious,

or to become over-engaged with pie-in-the-sky dreams,

or to be suddenly spilling over with repetitious babble and vapid rhetoric,

to keep scratching on the old saws in hackneyed ways: children, safety, and mother pie,

to mistake ire, payback, underhandedness… as passion,

to become overly-excited by the treasure now in sight, and to lose one or more wits as a result,

to use thick ‘leaderly’ persona (the mask that covers over flaws and errors) to promise unpromisable things, instead of speaking from a calm, strong, authentic self.

If we lived in ancient Roman times and had seers instead of Tiresias-like pundits, the sacred oracles, like Willie-Boy, might likely warn:

The homestretch is the most dangerous time…for even a time-tested fast rider, can misjudge the distance to the finish line, and rise up from the saddle too soon, losing the race.

Might those ancient seers say too, meaning for the good of each contender: Approaches now Quintus de Februarius, the fifth of February, a time of both danger and opportunity: Remain alert. Measure well.




This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 30th, 2008 at 7:19 am and is filed under TV, Mike Huckabee, Republican Party, Newsweek Blogitics, Super Tuesday, Primaries, John McCain, Mitt Romney, Democrats, 2008 Elections, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.