« Guest Voice: Memo To Barack Obama: How To Win The Pennsylvania Primary
Guest Voice: Hillary Clinton’s Health Care Plan: One Way To Help Pay For It »



Book Review: Portnoy’s Complaint by Philip Roth

April 1st, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

r148839_527331.jpg
This is another Guest Book Review by fiction writer Jessica Schneider who also writes for Cosmoetica, is Book Editor for Monsters and Critics and is the only contributor to her own blog.


Book Review: Portnoy’s Complaint by Philip Roth

By Jessica Schneider

This is an odd book. Yet, highly entertaining is it as long as excessive sexual details don’t deter you. Honestly, this book was better than I thought it would be—it’s quite funny actually, and I found myself laughing out loud. Here’s the thing: I had read Philip Roth in the past, two novellas of his, and found them to be rather humorless and silly. Portnoy’s Complaint, however, is rather silly and full of humor. So that’s not so bad.

The story all takes place on a shrink’s couch, where Alexander Portnoy is disclosing his Jewish American life story, or his impression of it anyway. Like most young males, he is sex obsessed and takes to extreme methods masturbation, (some involving food and socks and other objects) all detailed in length. He also lies to his mother about using the bathroom (for his own erotic purposes but he tells her he has diarrhea) creating a hilarious scene where Mrs. Portnoy demands to “look inside the bowl and see his poopie” to see just what it ailing her son, and all he can tell her is to “stop calling it poopie” because he’s in high school.

The book then covers his later years and his experiences with a whore named The Monkey (nicknamed The Monkey because she ate a banana while watching a couple have sex) who is fairly uneducated and dumb as a log and can’t seem to spell simple words, yet Alex stays with her because they have sex all the time. Some have said he has a hatred for women, and I didn’t find that to be the case. Since he is untrustworthy as a narrator, everything he says has to be taken with a grain of salt because his disclosures are, more often than not, hyperbole.

Mostly this book consists of a man’s ramblings about his sexual fantasies, and many reviewers online have commented that Alex is not a likeable character. I disagree with that, for while I didn’t particularly like him, he’s not unlikeable—just typical, and perhaps a tad bit immature.

Certainly he is funny, and of course he is making most of this stuff up since much of it doesn’t sound all that believable and it is highly plausible that this is just his fantasy. Having said that, Alex Portnoy is the textbook definition of the unreliable narrator. In fact, if the last line in the book is any indication, the entire “confession” is probably all in his head.

I wouldn’t call Portnoy’s Complaint a great novel, but certainly it is a good one—also, as I mentioned, one to be taken with a grain of salt. If highly detailed sex scenes offend you, then this is not your book. I lost track of the number of times certain four letter C words were used, for example.

As for what he’s complaining about? Everything. From his sexual situations, to women in general, to being Jewish, to wanting to hang with Gentiles, (they don’t talk with double negatives, he claims) to his own anxieties—everything is fair game. Another point readers have commented is that the book seems dated from when it was first published back in the 60s. I can’t say I agree with that because males are always going to have their delusional, sex-obsessed fantasies, and there is certainly nothing wrong with that (another reason why I don’t think Alex is an unlikeable character—he’s just typical in that way).

The reason this book works is because of its humor and the fact that it doesn’t take itself too seriously. Yes, there are moments in the book where Alex’s rants can get a bit tiresome and excessively silly, but such was probably Roth’s intention. When the moments do get tiresome and excessively silly, they don’t last long because the narrator is there to pull you back. The text is also not overly long, (my version finishes at 274 pages—large font) and the tale is what it is. While not a “deep” novel in the philosophical or even in the psychological sense, Alex does make some good insights about the human condition from time to time, when he’s not describing his latest oral escapade. And even when he is, Roth has some good descriptions of it.

A novel that certainly would have been “shocking” in its day, Portnoy’s Complaint holds up well, and while not as great or insightful with satire as someone like Vonnegut, for what it is, Portnoy’s Complaint certainly deserves its place in literary history.



This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 1st, 2008 at 12:15 am and is filed under Reviews, Books, Entertainment. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 5 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Guest Voice: Memo To Barack Obama: How To Win The Pennsylvania Primary
Guest Voice: Hillary Clinton’s Health Care Plan: One Way To Help Pay For It »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.