Book Review: In the Shadow of Man by Jane Goodall

December 3rd, 2007 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

This is another Guest Book Review by fiction writer Jessica Schneider who also writes for the highly visited site Cosmoetica, is Book Editor for Monsters and Critics and is the only contributor to her own blog.

Book Review: In the Shadow of Man by Jane Goodall

Review by Jessica Schneider

Jane Goodall is of course known for her observational work with chimpanzees. In the Shadow of Man is a highly interesting read for anyone who has ever wanted to know more about her work, and the nature of chimpanzees in general. While humans seem to take for granted the intelligence of the chimpanzee—our closest relative whose brain resembles ours more than the gorilla—this book will give you a new appreciation for the species as well as the individual chimps themselves.

Written in 1971, the book still has an updated feel to it, and is accessible and not laced in scientific jargon.

In the Shadow of Man tells the story of when Goodall began her research at the Gombe Stream Reserve in Africa, and how slowly she built a relationship with the chimps that likewise, began to build one with her. She discusses how she not only had to earn their trust, but also what she observed as far as their habits and behavior. After reading this book it came as no surprise to see how chimps really do have traits that are human like, in that they too undergo mood swings, jealous rages, laughter, caring for their young, and sexual promiscuity.

Rife with photographs, readers will learn the stories behind Flo, an old female who is not only the object of every male chimpanzee’s desire when she is in estrus, but also her number of children. Readers will also learn about David Graybeard, the first chimp that allowed Goodall to approach him, as well as Mike, Goliath, Leakey, Mr. McGregor, Worzle, Goblin, among many others. While anyone reading that list would think they were mere names and that is all, Goodall actually manages to develop the chimps’ characters within the book, and reading about Mr. McGregor ultimately contacting polio and being shunned by the other chimps during his last days will no doubt affect you. And although chimps do not have as distinct facial characteristics as do humans, the book is filled with facial photographs of these chimps, and I continually found myself thumbing through to see the actual face of the chimp she was speaking about. Surprisingly, once you get to know their traits they really do start to look differently from one another.

As I mentioned, I think that humans can easily take for granted the intelligence of this species, and just reading this book will allow anyone to see for themselves how witty these creatures are. Goodall discusses how she had to set up a feeding station for the chimps, and likewise, how she would have to lock up the bananas, as well as hide them from site. Thus it becomes only a matter of time before one of the chimps is able to figure out how to open the chest. As a result, Goodall is forced to fix the latch several times in several different ways, and again it becomes only a matter of time before they figure out how to open the chest. She and her husband Hugo would also have to come up with new hiding places for the food, because the chimps would easily remember where it was stashed.

She also examines the behavior between mother and child, and just as with humans, although the mother chimp will express caution for her child—that does not mean that some won’t be neglectful. It was particularly interesting when she spoke about Flint, the son of Flo, the old female. When his baby sister Flame was born, Flint, who was still a “child” of only a few years, regressed back to his babyhood and demanded Flo carry him on her back. Goodall also noted how Flint was somewhat of a “brat” whenever Flo did not give him the attention he sought. Just as with a bratty human child, Flint would throw temper tantrums and old Flo would have to listen to it and eventually give in, just to appease him.

Another aspect Goodall speaks about is animal testing.

Although she does not state that she is completely against it, she views the ways in which labs (and even the occasional zoo) house the chimps as almost “criminal” in her opinion.

Laboratories often like to keep chimps housed in small cages, leaving them with nothing to do all day except wait around for the next painful experiment. Chimps are at their best when they are free to climb and associate with other chimps.

For example, just as with humans, male chimps need to have their “guy time” with other male chimps. If one plans to keep chimps at the zoo, then it would be best to try to recreate their natural environment as best as possible. Goodall speaks of one zoo in particular that caged a male and female together, leaving them with nothing to do all day except for grooming themselves or each other, and nor was there a place to shield themselves from the hot sun. Their water would also run out by late morning, and not be refilled till the next day.

Because these are highly intelligent creatures, over time they can become depressed and lethargic—just as a human would if kept in a small prison cell. In fact, she believes that most of the chimps housed at zoos don’t even have as much freedom as human prisoners.

Goodall poses all these questions, but she does not preach. Instead, she presents the material and allows readers to arrive at their own conclusions.

Personally, after having read her book, I agree with what she says regarding the ways chimps are cruelly kept in captivity. This is not to imply that I think scientific experiments should all together be abandoned, but one is really forced to think twice about the poor ways in which the animals are treated.

Hopefully there will come a time when experimenting on higher animals won’t be needed. The biggest difference between them and us is that they have not been able to learn speech, but they have shown they do have an awareness of self—probably far more than we realize. So this does pose some ethical questions as to whether we have the “right” to experiment on creatures that are well aware of themselves when so many are opposed to experiments done on objects without any sentience all together—human embryos.

In the Shadow of Man is a terrific and informative book. Recommended for all humans.

This entry was posted on Monday, December 3rd, 2007 at 8:59 am and is filed under Reviews, Books. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Has Pro Football Become “Greedball”? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.