Re-Wolfing Urban Parks

May 1st, 2008
By MICHAEL SILVERSTEIN


Not long ago, several dozen gray wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park. It was part of an Interior Department effort to keep down excess deer and elk populations, and to restore a natural predator to a habitat where it once roamed freely. In a larger sense, it was also a recognition that the natural” approach to public land management, the way it was done before elaborate human planning became the rule, is still often the best way to get things done.

The question that immediately leaps to mind upon contemplating this natural methodology is whether a similar effort might work well in the park lands of major American cities. More specifically, whether the introduction of gray wolves into Fairmont Park in Philadelphia, the Arnold Arboretum in Boston, Golden Gate Park in an Francisco, or Central Park in New York, might have a salutary effect on the local ecologies of these urban areas.

Opposition to such a scheme, of course, might be considerable—at least initially. One can easily anticipate the objections of neighborhood people: “A threat to children.” “An affront to the homeless.” A danger to community security.” The rhetoric is familiar. We have heard it all before.

Such quibbles, however, are easily addressed. Wolves, it happens, love children, and rarely eat one unless very hungry. More frequently, upon finding abandoned human children (especially twins), they raise them like family. And when finances permit, wolf parents will even send their own pups to Montessouri or Friends schools.

As for gray wolves in city parks being an affront to the homeless, well, what isn’t these day? A person has no money, no shelter, no regular health care, no meaningful job potential. What difference does a pack or two of hunting wolves really make to this individuals current or future prospects?

Letting gray wolves (or even hyenas) roam the urban parks that dot America’s cityscapes is in fact a natural extension of our present national ethic. If some jogging attorney or stock analyst is too weak or slow to outrun the pack, let nature take its course. If teen gangs that roam city parks after dark have members who insist on going off on their own, down they go and good riddance. The lame, the young, the weak, the halt, they will all just have to take their chances—just like the rest of us who are attempting to survive in today’s Bush America.

Let the real gray wolves, as well as the figurative kinds, hunt freely among us. Without doubt, those with the strength to fight, the speed to flee, or the cunning to evade, will do so. As for the rest, well…

EDITOR’S NOTE: This earlier appeared under the wrong byline. This post was put on a timer with the correct byline but when it appeared, another one on the list was at the top of this piece. This has happened one other time. We regret the error.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 1st, 2008 at 12:15 am and is filed under Satire, Humor, Society, Environment. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


Of Presidents, Politicians & Expectations »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.