Matthews, Clinton & Colbert: Retributive Justice In The Modern Mediascape (Guest Voice)

April 17th, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

THIS.png

This Guest Voice is by video and web producer Joe Windish, who wrote a well received column earlier this week. He takes another look at the dynamics between politics and cable political and comedy talk shows.

Matthews, Clinton & Colbert: Retributive Jusice In The Modern Mediascape

by Joe Windish

Stephen Colbert ends his Philadelphia run tonight with a guest appearance by Hillary Clinton. There’s nothing saying that appearance will be an interview and it’s too bad, too, after last night’s debate.

The story-line this morning is her relentless pounding of Obama on Rev. Wright and the Weather Underground and the like, as he uses tea and cookies as a means to diffuse such issues rather than attack. He refused even to pile on when given the opportunity with her Bosnia gaffe and (unlike Andrew) I admire him all the more for it.

The bigger debate take away, of course, is her “Yes! Yes! Yes!” belief that Obama could win the presidency.

All of this is the stuff of a great Colbert interview!

A Clinton on the Colbert set the day after a debate that some say could have been scripted for her by a sycophant press caught up in all of the non-issues of the day is all of the license Colbert needs to go for comedy of epic Correspondents Association Dinner proportions.

I’ll be watching closely tonight.

Colbert’s performance has been fine in Philadelphia, still he’s yet to really soar. Maybe it’s the road, or the size of the theater (nine times that of his NY home), but I have to wonder if he wasn’t thrown off his stride that very first night interviewing Philadelphia native Chris Matthews…

STEPHEN COLBERT: Your show’s called Hardball.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Right.

STEPHEN COLBERT: Well I think I have a harder ball than you and let me tell you why.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Hah!!!

STEPHEN COLBERT: Because Barack Obama did an hour with you, how hard could your ball be? He won’t come on my show. I clearly swing a harder ball.

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Let me put you another case… you’ve got Hillary Clinton coming on, right?

STEPHEN COLBERT: Uh… [pregnant pause]… There’s a possibility of that Chris… We like to surprise people with certain guests.


You’ll recall that in my world, Colbert was more worthy of the 8,000 word profile that the New York Times devoted on Sunday to Matthews. Here’s the only passage in which Colbert is mentioned in that story:

Matthews’s bombast is radically at odds with the wry, antipolitical style fashioned by Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert or the cutting and finely tuned cynicism of Matthews’s MSNBC co-worker Keith Olbermann. These hosts betray none of the reverence for politics or the rituals of Washington that Matthews does. On the contrary, they appeal to the eye-rolling tendencies of a cooler, highly educated urban cohort of the electorate that mostly dismisses an exuberant political animal like Matthews as annoyingly antiquated, like the ranting uncle at the Thanksgiving table whom the kids have learned to tune out.

Nothing illustrated Matthews’s discordance with the new cable ethos better than an eviscerating interview he suffered through last fall at the hands of Stewart himself. Matthews went on the “The Daily Show” to promote his book “Life’s a Campaign: What Politics Has Taught Me About Friendship, Rivalry, Reputation and Success.” [video] The book essentially advertises itself as a guidebook for readers wishing to apply the lessons of winning politicians to succeeding in life. “People don’t mind being used; they mind being discarded” is the title of one chapter. “A self-hurt book” and “a recipe for sadness” Stewart called it, and the interview was all squirms from there. “This strikes me as artifice,” Stewart said. “If you live by this book, your life will be strategy, and if your life is strategy, you will be unhappy.”

Matthews accused Stewart of “trashing my book.”

So did Matthews foil Colbert’s Clinton surprise in some small way to get back at the fake news guys for trashing his book? Maybe even subliminally?

Colbert went on to wrangle from Matthews a kinda, sorta, admission, that yes, maybe, he’ll challenge Pennsylvania Republican Senator Arlen Specter when he runs for re-election in 2010.

“I want to be a senator,” Matthews said. “I think it’s more important to serve the people.”

I used to think Hillary believed that, too, that she’d be happy to go back to the Senate. Not so much anymore.

It’s worth remembering that as caught up as we all are in the media story of this race, it’s been all but a mathematical certainty for a good long time now that she cannot win. She will not be the Democratic nominee. We are all just waiting for her to understand that.

Maybe Colbert can help tonight.

Meanwhile, on The Chris Matthews Show last weekend, David Brooks said “Hillary Clinton’s next job is going to be governor of New York, and there are important Democrats trying to maneuver that already.”

At this point I’d say sending Clinton up the river to Albany sounds about as good a place as any for her to wind up in to me!

Joe Windish is an accomplished video and web producer. His work has been seen on local and national television, and on one of the earliest commercial webcast channels. In 2003, after 28 years of living and working in New York City, Joe moved to rural Georgia so his life-partner could take a job as professor at a public liberal arts college. He blogs on politics, media, technology, gay life, and southern living at aTypicalJoe.com.

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 17th, 2008 at 6:21 am and is filed under Satire, Humor, Debates, MSM, Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Stephen Colbert, Pennsylvania, Chris Matthews, Elections, Media, Media Criticism, 2008 Elections, Politics, Cable Talk Shows, Democrats, Guest Contributor, Hillary Clinton, Republicans, Comedy & Humor. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Ollie Johnston (1912-2008) »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.