Tibet, Beijing and the Occident: An ‘Incredible Mess’

March 28th, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN

Telegraph, U.K.

Is there any hope at all that the West will do more than pay lip service to the plight of the downtrodden Tibetan people? Le Figaro’s Beijing correspondent Mével writes, “China has erred on Tibet. The West deluded itself about China - and the Tibetans are likely to pay dearly if their illusions lead them to expect more than dust in the eyes [a show of support] from the democracies.”

Analysis by Mével

Translated By Sandrine Ageorges

March 26, 2008

France - Le Figaro - Original Article (French)

The powerful Communist Party machine certainly didn’t foresee this. Beijing wants to make the Games a showcase for its brilliant success. But at the start of this Olympic season, propaganda needs have forced a drawing of the curtain. Chinese television cut off a live broadcast of ceremonies in Olympia, Greece [the lighting of the Olympic torch WATCH ], depriving the images to hundreds of millions of spectators and signaling that support for the Games is far from unanimous.

The repression of the Tibetan revolt explains the protest and the censorship. And this incident won’t be the last. The journey of the Olympic torch was to be a triumphant march toward the opening of the Games on August 8th in Beijing. It is more likely to be an odyssey mounted under extreme police protection in London (on April 9th), San Francisco and Nagano. There are unlikely to be any boos on the route through China, but in Lhasa on June 21st, voices will be constrained.

The Olympic ideal is a Spanish hostel. [A place where people of different cultures mix]. The peculiar aspect of this crisis is that all sides feel betrayed. Three misunderstandings crystallize this incredible mess. China has erred on Tibet. The West deluded itself about China. And finally, the Tibetans are likely to pay dearly if their illusions lead them to expect much more than dust in the eyes [a show of support] from the democracies.

The greatest fault is that of Beijing. China has never fully-controlled the Himalayan kingdom. Until these last few weeks, Hu Jintao’s team sincerely believed that it had found the panacea: to win the hearts of the Tibetans, it was enough to invest, bring in the railway to improve the standard of living and ignore the Dalai-Lama until he disappears. With the approach of the Games, Chinese security was concerned about foreign protesters and dissidents from Beijing, but not the monasteries perched at an altitude of 4,000 meters [13,000 feet].

In Lhasa revolt has ripped this illusion. …

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the implications of the Tibet crisis on the U.S. and the West.

This entry was posted on Friday, March 28th, 2008 at 4:45 am and is filed under Cartoons, Communism, Tyranny, Political Philosophy, Human Rights, Buddhism, Newspapers, Civil Liberties, France, Foreign Affairs, China, Minorities, Cartoon Commentary, Ideologies, Atheists, Sports. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

A Not Good Internet News Media Sign For Hillary Clinton »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.